- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 17,163
Since only DH and @Austina are for stopping , I just sent David an email to get started! It should be very easy since my lab diamond setting is almost exactly what I want. I think an MRB will be fine in that setting (minus the blackened silver top). And @Bonfire, you're right. I will figure out what to do with the lab diamond ring later. I am so excited y'all!!! I have wanted my ering in gold for a long time. It's funny how some people think yellow gold makes the stone appear more yellow and others think the contrast makes the stone look whiter. Honestly, I don't care! I realize that I am all about the entire piece of jewelry and I love rich yellow gold. Don't get me wrong, I want a beautiful stone. But the setting is just as important to me. As are the bands to go with it!
Thanks for all the input! All of you enablers are my kind of peeps!
@Gussie,
You don’t need a new hobby. Think about all the women who live vicariously thru you. You don’t want to be a thief of JOY!!!
This has been a really fun thread!
I just got the first cad from David. I am really terrible at this so would yall take a look? I decided to forego the cathedral since it is as low set as possible and the donut is large. Do you think it's too closed in the gallery? Cleaning won't be a problem with the huge bottom opening.
@yssie, @MissGotRocks , @mrs-b, @Bonfire, @MamaBee, @Cerulean , @Slickk, @Tonks
No, I don’t think it is too closed in for cleaning - and the bottom is completely open so that shouldn’t be an issue.
Are you doing prongs and bezel?
My only other thought is to perhaps taper the head as it meets the shank - making it less wide. That may be the aesthetic you are looking for though or it may be based on the size of the diamond.
What are your thoughts about it?
I just got the first cad from David. I am really terrible at this so would yall take a look? I decided to forego the cathedral since it is as low set as possible and the donut is large. Do you think it's too closed in the gallery? Cleaning won't be a problem with the huge bottom opening.
@yssie, @MissGotRocks , @mrs-b, @Bonfire, @MamaBee, @Cerulean , @Slickk, @Tonks
@tyty333 and anyone else who would chime in!
Two thoughts from me -
1. I like the top view with the eight prongs. Can those prongs come down into the gallery as well, rather than having the cutouts be spaced at non-multiplicative intervals? It's about 1.5 spaces per prong separation right now - would love to see this become either 1:1 or 1:2.
2. Was the ring design yours or DK's? Does it symbolize something?
Came to say the same thing about the prongs extending.
I also think it’s certainly open enough for cleaning!
This is all personal preference…but since the bezel is adding visual weight, I’d bump up the shank to 2mm high off the finger and 2.2mm wide, something about it looks a bit too petite given the size of the head - if I recall the Margot is 1.9mm wide but it’s also platinum, so this is a bit thicker and sturdier, but I think a slightly thicker shank would go with the “vibe”
I think I need to keep the shank at 2 mm so that I can still stack 2 bands.
@Gussie I really like the cad the way it is as far as how the shoulder attaches to the head. It has the cupcake side views which I love because the shoulder is low and not connected. I know everyone likes it the other way by making it more incorporated. My previous Whiteflash Valoria setting had a similar side view..I just loved seeing the diamond cradled by itself. It also made the diamond look larger IMHO.
Since you love prongs I wouldn’t hesitate to have them. You would still have the bezel look..It would also be so easy to pop your diamond out for a change back to your other setting later if you get a change of heart.
One thing I would do is to make the shank 2mm..both height and depth..
I would just say to do what you like the best. There’s no right or wrong answer. Trust what you like..I can’t wait to see it done!