shape
carat
color
clarity

Anyone here prefer NOT to have a

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
After reading this thread, I realize AGAIN how grateful I am for my friends and family. It isn''t all about them. They do the things they do for my pets for me. I am grateful they are able to recognize my feelings. But then, I''ve never forgotten a single birthday, occassion, etc. of their children. They wouldn''t expect me to. Again, I realize what great people surround me.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 9:16:03 AM
Author: icekid

But children have always been drawn to me for some reason. They have a life force that is unlike anything you will find in most adults. They are strong, resilient, energetic, and full of everything that is good about life (even the bratty ones with indulgent parents, often!).

I did not PM sjz, but I can certainly see where she is coming from and why she felt attacked. And I have no problem saying so here either
1.gif

On the first statement I can agree.

On the second, I can not. Attacked? It''s the other way around with the use of words like "nuts" & "fanatical".

In your own words, SO WHAT if someone calls their pets "furbabies". Honestly, can''t someone pick a platform more worthy?

And, in no post did I see anyone put their pet as equal to the life of a child. I simply can not comprehend why ANYONE would knock someone for having affection and love towards a living creature. I simply can not understand someone being judgemental against that love. Goes against my very thought process.
 
I would say just about everyone I know did not have their children to take care of them in their old age. They had them because they wanted them. I have seen that with some of my DH's hispanic family and a couple of asian famiiles I know. It's more cultural. I have a couple of friends with 6 children. They have more fun than any family with 1 or 2 I've ever met. Sadly, when most people have only one child they raise the child as a little adult and leave them to their own devices too often. That said, I agree with the poster who said they'd take a bullet or a disesase for their child but not their pet. It isn't the same. I have to laugh when I hear people defending their positions like they're afraid the other person is going to make them change their mind by stating their opinion. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and I find it personally sad that those who choose not to have children do it because of what they've seen in a minority of other parents. Believe me, I've known a couple of couples who hadn't really planned children, have oops, and continue to have more because they found what a joy it is. There are no guarantees, but you raise your own children and while children are not totally blank slates, you have some influence over how they treat you, by how you treat them. My boys are totally different and the younger one loves to be out with his friends, but when needed, he's here. Our oldest is here more often because his friends are at his school a couple of hours away. But, they are both wonderful, loving young men at 19 and 21 and have never given us any real problems. Just like we've always made them important in our lives, they have done the same. I'd have to say the best thing we've ever done is have our boys and me being home to raise them. And, I expect nothing in return, as a loving parent should. Being a parent is a selfless act because there are no guarantees, but then again, nothing is guaranteed, ever.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 9:50:52 AM
Author: Momoftwo
I would say just about everyone I know did not have their children to take care of them in their old age.

And, I expect nothing in return, as a loving parent should. Being a parent is a selfless act because there are no guarantees, but then again, nothing is guaranteed, ever.
I find the whole notion to be quite strange too. Having children so that they will take care of me in my old age??? Geez, are you breeding for a caretaker?

Funny, the last thing my parents want from me is "help". Sure, we make sure the grass at the top of the hill gets cut (my father can''t push the lawnmover up there - BUT - whoa be it if someone cuts the low level grass). We look after them; but, they want to take care of things themselves. They are most happy when I ask them for help. I see the joy it brings them; so, I find myself seeking their wisdom. And, they usually have some wisdom.

They are 80+ and still able mind & somewhat body. If circumstances change, I have no doubt I would look after them. But, at this point, it''s a hinderence to their independence.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 9:49:13 AM
Author: fire&ice



Date: 7/9/2005 9:16:03 AM
Author: icekid




But children have always been drawn to me for some reason. They have a life force that is unlike anything you will find in most adults. They are strong, resilient, energetic, and full of everything that is good about life (even the bratty ones with indulgent parents, often!).




I did not PM sjz, but I can certainly see where she is coming from and why she felt attacked. And I have no problem saying so here either
1.gif

On the first statement I can agree.

On the second, I can not. Attacked? It's the other way around with the use of words like 'nuts' & 'fanatical'.

In your own words, SO WHAT if someone calls their pets 'furbabies'. Honestly, can't someone pick a platform more worthy?

And, in no post did I see anyone put their pet as equal to the life of a child. I simply can not comprehend why ANYONE would knock someone for having affection and love towards a living creature. I simply can not understand someone being judgemental against that love. Goes against my very thought process.
And I can't understand why you and a couple of other people felt that I was being judgemental or knocking people who feel love and affection for their pets! I was talking about people who go what I consider to be overboard. I think that maybe some of you probably felt like I was talking about you because maybe other people have accused you of going overoard in the past, or maybe you even suspect that about yourselves. I don't know. Whatever. I did not name anyone specifically in any of my posts, nor did I intend to be speaking of any one specific. I was speaking in generalities. Then all of a sudden, you guys were taking offense at everything I said, as If I was speaking specifically about you, and using words to describe my posts such as "inflamatory" or "ugly". To me, those words are just as judgemental and provoking as anything that I said. And YOU WERE specifically talking to me, and about me. I didn't attack anyone's way of treating or caring for their pet, yet someone basically attacked the way that I care for my cat. Did I get all upset and offended? Nope. I, very politely I thought, explained why I felt and acted differently and thanked the person for their concern. I was also more or less accused of making up fictitious "ghost writers" who sent me messages privately. That was pretty inflamatory IMO as well. At least one of those people had the nerve to speak up and say that she did PM in agreement. Thanks Jellybean. Not that I blame the other people for not doing it. The reason they didn't speak up in the first place is because of the kinds of posts I got for stating my opinon. That's too bad, really. People shouldn't feel like they can't speak their minds unless they fall in with the popular consensus. But it appears that a lot of people do. I did, hence what I said in my very first post about not touching this topic with a ten foot pole. I am quite impressed with one person, though. Aljdewey. She obviously doesn't agree with anything I said, but she had the class to NOT take my comments personally, and to post her disagreement with me in a polite, reasonable, and non-confrontational way. She didn't attack me personally, she didn't suggest that I "bow out" of the thread, or accuse me of anything. She simply disagreed and explained why. I can appreciate that. Even if she took only snippets of some of my posts, she didn't take them out of context or try to skew them in a different way than I originally posted them.

I don't back down on anything that I've said. I think that there ARE people who are fanatical about their pets. I also think that there are people who are fanatical about their kids. Heck, I even think that there are people who are fanatical about diamonds
2.gif
. None of that really bothers me. What does bother me are people who think they have a right to be nasty or snide or judgmental toward ME because I don't happen to have the same opinon that they do. I also don't like it when people try to put words into my mouth that I didn't say (or type). I really don't think that anyone who would read my posts with an open minded attitude could find ANY comments where I said that people shouldn't love their pets, or show their pets affection and devotion. Because I don't feel that there's anything wrong with it. I only tried to convey that I didn't agree with people who place pets on the same level, or even a similar level as children. I realize that you may not agree with me, but I do have a right to my opinons, and THOUGHT I had a right to state those opinions without being mocked, critisized, or attacked. And yes, I did think that I was attacked.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 9:50:52 AM
Author: Momoftwo
I would say just about everyone I know did not have their children to take care of them in their old age. They had them because they wanted them. I have seen that with some of my DH''s hispanic family and a couple of asian famiiles I know. It''s more cultural. I have a couple of friends with 6 children. They have more fun than any family with 1 or 2 I''ve ever met. Sadly, when most people have only one child they raise the child as a little adult and leave them to their own devices too often. That said, I agree with the poster who said they''d take a bullet or a disesase for their child but not their pet. It isn''t the same. I have to laugh when I hear people defending their positions like they''re afraid the other person is going to make them change their mind by stating their opinion. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and I find it personally sad that those who choose not to have children do it because of what they''ve seen in a minority of other parents. Believe me, I''ve known a couple of couples who hadn''t really planned children, have oops, and continue to have more because they found what a joy it is. There are no guarantees, but you raise your own children and while children are not totally blank slates, you have some influence over how they treat you, by how you treat them. My boys are totally different and the younger one loves to be out with his friends, but when needed, he''s here. Our oldest is here more often because his friends are at his school a couple of hours away. But, they are both wonderful, loving young men at 19 and 21 and have never given us any real problems. Just like we''ve always made them important in our lives, they have done the same. I''d have to say the best thing we''ve ever done is have our boys and me being home to raise them. And, I expect nothing in return, as a loving parent should. Being a parent is a selfless act because there are no guarantees, but then again, nothing is guaranteed, ever.
I agree with everything you said in your post. I kind of feel sorry for some of the people who''ve posted their opinions and experiences where kids are concerned. Almost none of that has been my experience. Almost everyone I know that has kids wanted them after they had them, no matter how they felt about kids before they had them. And I don''t know anyone who had their kids so that they would have someone to take care of them when they are old. Sure, I''ve known people who weren''t good parents. I''ve even know a couple of people that regretted having kids. And I''ve known rotten kids. But those people have been in the vast minority of the people I''ve known in my life. Most parents I know are good parents, or at least try their best to be, and love their kids more than anything else. For most people I know the positive FAR outweighs the negative when it comes to their kids. As far as kids go...well, they are kids. You made a good point about kids not totally being blank slates. But a lot of the spoiled, bratty, or unhappy children didn''t get that way all by themselves. A good deal of the way kids turn out is a direct result of the way their parents raised them.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 10:20:54 AM
Author: sjz

Date: 7/9/2005 9:49:13 AM
Author: fire&ice




Date: 7/9/2005 9:16:03 AM
Author: icekid





But children have always been drawn to me for some reason. They have a life force that is unlike anything you will find in most adults. They are strong, resilient, energetic, and full of everything that is good about life (even the bratty ones with indulgent parents, often!).





I did not PM sjz, but I can certainly see where she is coming from and why she felt attacked. And I have no problem saying so here either
1.gif

On the first statement I can agree.

On the second, I can not. Attacked? It''s the other way around with the use of words like ''nuts'' & ''fanatical''.

In your own words, SO WHAT if someone calls their pets ''furbabies''. Honestly, can''t someone pick a platform more worthy?

And, in no post did I see anyone put their pet as equal to the life of a child. I simply can not comprehend why ANYONE would knock someone for having affection and love towards a living creature. I simply can not understand someone being judgemental against that love. Goes against my very thought process.
And I can''t understand why you and a couple of other people felt that I was being judgemental or knocking people who feel love and affection for their pets! I was talking about people who go what I consider to be overboard. I think that maybe some of you probably felt like I was talking about you because maybe other people have accused you of going overoard in the past, or maybe you even suspect that about yourselves. I don''t know. Whatever.
No, I have never been accused of such. As I stated, I am SO grateful for the people that surround me. I have realized that their attention to my pet is a selfless act. It''s a recognition of what is important to me. But then, my parents have always hung a stocking for all of our pets; and, my family & friends have always sent a condolence card (some with gifts to the Vet school) when we lost a dog. They aren''t control freaks that try to dicate how *I should feel*. They realize how I feel as my reality. Love isn''t a bad thing.

I find it amusing that you can define "overboard". Overboard is relative & can apply to ANY situation.
 
I just wanted to say I would have far less love in my life if it wasn''t for my pets.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 10:37:17 AM
Author: fire&ice


I find it amusing that you can define ''overboard''. Overboard is relative & can apply to ANY situation.
Yup, when you''re right you''re right. I''m not going to get drawn into another pointless debate by trying to "define" my opinion of overboard, either. That might offend someone, and I certainly don''t want that. I will say, though that I''ve known people have been what I consider to be so overboard with their pets that I felt sorry for the pets! And these people were obviously thinking that their behavior was out of "love" for their pet and that they were doing the right thing. I''ve known people who were that way with their kids, too BTW. What some parents consider to be loving their kids, being kind and generous, or lenient, or giving them the best of everything...other people on the outside would call overindulgence or spoiling.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 9:50:52 AM
Author: Momoftwo

I find it personally sad that those who choose not to have children do it because of what they''ve seen in a minority of other parents. Believe me, I''ve known a couple of couples who hadn''t really planned children, have oops, and continue to have more because they found what a joy it is.
I don''t choose not to have children because of what I''ve seen with others. I choose not to have children because I don''t want them now.....period. No mystery about it. I''m almost 40, I don''t have the patience for children that I once had in my youth, and I''ve decided that the right choice FOR ME is not to have them.

As far as couples who discovered what a joy it is, I''m thrilled for them. But there are just as many folks who have children and *don''t* find it to be the all-consuming joy that others do. And for them, what''s the solution? There is none, because it cannot be undone.

It''s a joy for some, yes, but it''s not a joy for everyone......and for the children of those who don''t find it joyful, it''s a very difficult life.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 9:43:13 AM
Author: fire&ice
After reading this thread, I realize AGAIN how grateful I am for my friends and family. It isn''t all about them. They do the things they do for my pets for me. I am grateful they are able to recognize my feelings. But then, I''ve never forgotten a single birthday, occassion, etc. of their children. They wouldn''t expect me to. Again, I realize what great people surround me.

I have one friend, childless but married with three dogs and huge number of bantam chickens, who never missed one birthday my daughter had...although she did not lay eyes on her until this year when we moved to Virginia. She sent not only a card, but a gift every year! (My friend lives in Kewsick, near Charlottesville, which is why we didn''t see her while living in Connecticut.) All I can say is that it blew me away that a friend-and not even a friend I had had had all my life-would do this for my daughter!
 
If people don't want kids, cool. If people want to have kids, that's cool too. If people want to have pets, cool. If people don't want pets, thats cool too!! If people want both then that's ..... cool!!!!

For heavens sakes this thread has gone on for 7 pages and I think we are beating a dead horse, but that's just MHO.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 11:34:13 AM
Author: aljdewey

Date: 7/9/2005 9:50:52 AM
Author: Momoftwo

I find it personally sad that those who choose not to have children do it because of what they''ve seen in a minority of other parents. Believe me, I''ve known a couple of couples who hadn''t really planned children, have oops, and continue to have more because they found what a joy it is.
I don''t choose not to have children because of what I''ve seen with others. I choose not to have children because I don''t want them now.....period. No mystery about it. I''m almost 40, I don''t have the patience for children that I once had in my youth, and I''ve decided that the right choice FOR ME is not to have them.

As far as couples who discovered what a joy it is, I''m thrilled for them. But there are just as many folks who have children and *don''t* find it to be the all-consuming joy that others do. And for them, what''s the solution? There is none, because it cannot be undone.

It''s a joy for some, yes, but it''s not a joy for everyone......and for the children of those who don''t find it joyful, it''s a very difficult life.
Interesting, since this post was not directed at anyone, in particular.! At least one poster said they didn''t want children because of what they''ve seen in other parents with their children. I never said anyone shouldhave them who doesn''t want them, but having had children I think I can speak to the fact it is the greatest joy I''VE ever had. How can you know if it''s a joy or not if you''ve never done it? I would guess that most people who dont'' want children thinking it won''t be joyful were raised in homes where they don''t think they were wanted. Your last sentence makes it sound like you''re talking from personal experience. It''s definitely not all consuming for us and never has been. It''s been a great piece of our life. They''re now adults and we treat them as such. Children do grow up. Our marriage actually comes first unless it''s an emergency. Not having kids also can''t be "Undone". For those of us that have kids, we''ve been on the not having kids side before we had them and we speak from the knowledge that it''s a joy to us. Don''t take something personally that wasn''t aimed at any one person. Once again, personal opinion is not an attack on anyone. Just opinions.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 12:05:03 PM
Author: kaleigh
If people don''t want kids, cool. If people want to have kids, that''s cool too. If people want to have pets, cool. If people don''t want pets, thats cool too!! If people want both then that''s ..... cool!!!!

For heavens sakes this thread has gone on for 7 pages and I think we are beating a dead horse, but that''s just MHO.
36.gif
 
Date: 7/9/2005 12:33:09 PM
Author: Momoftwo
I would guess that most people who dont'' want children thinking it won''t be joyful were raised in homes where they don''t think they were wanted.
Oh no! Quite the opposite. In our case, it''s far more complicated than any ONE thing. At the end of the day, simply put - it wasn''t in the stars for us.

Yes, white off of rice.
2.gif
But, I couldn''t let that comment be out there because my parents were great role models.
 
Date: 7/9/2005 12:45:16 PM
Author: Patty





Date: 7/9/2005 12:05:03 PM
Author: kaleigh
If people don't want kids, cool. If people want to have kids, that's cool too. If people want to have pets, cool. If people don't want pets, thats cool too!! If people want both then that's ..... cool!!!!

For heavens sakes this thread has gone on for 7 pages and I think we are beating a dead horse, but that's just MHO.
36.gif
I third that one! Was that not what I was saying all all along?? Some people just like to continue on with martyrdom!
20.gif


One of my favorite phrases comes to mind here...Cry me a river. Usually I insert an expletive in front of river, but this is a family show!!
9.gif


Edited to add: My final thought which I just had to post but I won't bother to respond to as this is totally a dead horse. I can't believe that some posters cannot understand how condescending and judgemental they are acting towards people who may not want kids. That's 'sad' to you? I find it sad that some people just cannot help themselves but to get involved and tell others that they are fanatical or overboard or this or that when it doesn't even relate to them. Basically how you feel about others lives when no one is even asking you. No one said loving a pet is like a child. But we have 4 pages of that being shoved down the throats. I agree that those who are called fanatical or overboard or whatever *inflammatory* words came from some saintly posters are the ones who were attacked. Why do people feel the need to defend? Not because they resemble that remark but maybe they are defending all others out there who may!
 
Date: 7/9/2005 12:05:03 PM
Author: kaleigh
If people don't want kids, cool. If people want to have kids, that's cool too. If people want to have pets, cool. If people don't want pets, thats cool too!! If people want both then that's ..... cool!!!!

For heavens sakes this thread has gone on for 7 pages and I think we are beating a dead horse, but that's just MHO.
Amen.
36.gif


People shouldn't shove their kids down others' throats and the same for people with pets. Like I always say, my only gripe are people who think their kids' rights supercede mine. Newsflash: they don't. And my animals' rights don't supercede yours, unless you are in my home.
9.gif


ETA: Then again, anytime someone new comes over, I ALWAYS ask if they like/are afraid of dogs so I can be sure to curb the dogs' so they feel comfortable-I won't lock them in the basement but I will hold them back and discipline them not to be all over the guest. Too bad some homes I go to with kids don't do the same. I really could do without Little Johnny's grape jelly covered hands all over my new Gucci.
2.gif
 
I agree re: behavior of the pets Jen...to me that's being a good parent! Furkid or regular....being aware of what is going on outside your house with others and how they respond to your 'kids' is important.

My girlfriend has a dog who can be out of control and he irritates other people with his barking and jumping on them etc and he can be kind of scary with his big mouth of teeth (even though he is totally friendly)...her response when I told her she should get him some training so he can be better around other people and she can take him more places is something like he should be able express himself. I was like...he is a DOG!!! I totally recognize that people sometimes are freaked out about dogs, even little Portia! Grown men back away from her sometimes when she walks up to greet them. All 16 pounds of white fluff. So IMO you have to be aware.

People who come over to our house are always amazed at how quiet and well-behaved P is....she just will hang out with everyone and not get in the way etc. Elliott on the other hand will mow you down if there is food involved. I adore E, but sometimes he needs a firm hand and usually it's mine and not hers!!
9.gif


In terms of raising kids and/or dogs, I firmly belive in parenting/training being foremost to try to school your child or pet into being 'good', but the rest is just the dog or child's personality. And before anyone freaks out that I am using kid/dog interchangeably, to me you employ similar tactics when you are training a dog or raising a child. Patience and a firm hand being foremost necessary IMO.
 
This forum has been very informative. I used to think that it is selfish that people would love thier dogs more than the love people and would love a child. Now I know I should be thankful that those people do not want children... therefore a child will never enter this world with people that think that they are nosiy, inconsiderate, worthless brats... Better for those people to stick to the animals that will not suffer long term.
 
I have one thing to add and this comes right from a saying my grandmother Nanny always says, so hear goes and don''t get mad at me for saying it, because I think it''s funny and appropriate at this time.

Leave it lay where Jesus flung it!!!

Just a little humor, that''s all!!!!
3.gif
 
Date: 7/9/2005 2:35:03 PM
Author: MINE!!
This forum has been very informative. I used to think that it is selfish that people would love thier dogs more than the love people and would love a child. Now I know I should be thankful that those people do not want children... therefore a child will never enter this world with people that think that they are nosiy, inconsiderate, worthless brats... Better for those people to stick to the animals that will not suffer long term.
Do you realize what you said? Can you please point out ANY post that said they love their dogs more than they love people and would love a child? Who are you to judge who is selfish? You know what I think is selfish - not recognizing something of importance to another person close to you even if you "judge" it irrelavent. Judging it irrelavent is the most sincere form of selfishness.

Now I''ve seen everything. Yep, having a love for your dog transcended in this thread NOW to a commentary on who or who should not have children? Animals that will not suffer long term?????????????????????????

Oh, you can go no further than to quote here - Yep, this thread certainly has helped me realize that I DO love my dogs better than some people.
20.gif


I''m still shaking my head at the fact that Love is Love. Isn''t it supposed to be a good thing? Isn''t nuturing (subsitute "mothering) any loving creature a good thing?
 
MINE,
You need to apologize. That was way off the mark!!!!
38.gif
 
Date: 7/9/2005 12:05:03 PM
Author: kaleigh
If people don''t want kids, cool. If people want to have kids, that''s cool too. If people want to have pets, cool. If people don''t want pets, thats cool too!! If people want both then that''s ..... cool!!!!
Isn''t it marvelous that in this common era women have many choices?
2.gif
Let''s take the time to respect this!
 
Steady on Mine -
38.gif
 
Everyone...please. I love all of God''s creations and I am grateful for boht children and pets...especially super sweet Boston Terriers who willingly wash my face! I think where ever you find love to give and to receive it is fantastically amazing.
I hope everyone takes a chill pill soon or Leniod and Irenia are going to have to shut down yet another thread.
 
YOU KNOW IT--SOME People are strange...

A man goes to a restaurant and buys a small juice carton. On the side, he sees a peel-off prize sticker. He opens it and yells, "I won a motor home! I won a Winnebago motor home!" The waitress argues, "That''s impossible. The biggest prize is a stereo system!" The man insists, "No.
I won a motor home!" The manager hears the ruckus and walks over. He says, "You couldn''t possibly have won a motor home, because we didn''t have that as one of our prizes." The customer insists, and hands the manager the sticker. On it, the manager reads, "Win a Bagel."
 
A Kentucky horse breeder had a filly that won every race. But as she aged, she became temperamental. When he raced her in the evening,
she won handily. But in day races, she finished last. He consulted the top veterinarians and horse psychologists, to no avail. He finally gave
up, because she had become a real night mare.
 
This thread is closed for the cruelty to the "dead horse".
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top