- Joined
- Aug 15, 2000
- Messages
- 18,878
Some of these ladies are blokes hahahahaBut I wouldnt have my near ideal diamond, which i adore, without the help these ladies gave me.
Thank you!
but thanks for your post
Some of these ladies are blokes hahahahaBut I wouldnt have my near ideal diamond, which i adore, without the help these ladies gave me.
Thank you!
Some of these ladies are blokes hahahaha
but thanks for your post
I strongly agree with your post, and your experience is symptomatic of what I have seen in terms of recommendations boiling down to 2 super-ideal diamonds with tiny differences in color and clarity between them. There is not enough affordance for a poster to express their visual preferences so that other people can tailor their advice. I think that consumer education and posting guides should focus on helping newbies identify and express their visual preferences so they receive the right recommendations. I meant if someone comes in wanting a "good color" diamond with a small budget no one will recommend an L to them, when in reality there are well-cut Ls that typical humans will view as white in all lighting situations which would enable them to get a much much larger diamond!
Seeking size in a well-cut diamond is not bad, it enables the beautiful internal geometry of the diamond to be viewed with the naked eye. Most of the time I am looking at a diamond in a room with other people, I am viewing the geometry, not the scintillation and brilliance.
Like your wife, I would prefer the stunning and well-cut 4 ct K SI2 vs. a significantly smaller stone.
Her diamond has the following proportions from what I remember@msop04, would you mind explaining what a hybrid 59/60 is? Thank you!
Some of these ladies are blokes hahahaha
but thanks for your post
Her diamond has the following proportions from what I remember
59 Table, 60 Depth, 34 Table, 40.8 Pavilion.
It behaves very much like TIC, but has the spread of 60/60 (BIC).
It is not an official term. I just came up with it as I was writing the post.
@Fabulous50... sorry, I just saw this... flyingpig has a pretty good memory!
I have a 3.33 ct with a 9.8 mm spread that scores excellent on all 4 areas of the HCA, so I feel very lucky to have found it!
Here are the specs:
![]()
Oops. I was debating between 40.6 and 40.8PA. But 59% depth and 9.8mm! That is even better. That is almost 3.7 carat territory for spread.
As I follow this thread:
What to look for in a dealer
Hi all, thinking of proposing soon and going out with my girlfriend this weekend to get an idea of what she likes. For the final product, though, I’m thinking of going with a private dealer that my family has known for decades. Several of my cousins have gotten their engagement rings with him...www.pricescope.com
I am curious if you think we are helping or hurting this newbie? Too elitist or providing good service?
hurting....
im sick with a high fever at times and it was making my head hurt with the complexity.
what is it doing to a newbie.
I agree.And again, I take offense at Garry's thread title ... 99% of noobs are being disserviced?
Really? 99%? GMAB!![]()
I agree.
But....
That does not mean we collectively can not present it in a more understandable manner without overloading people from the start.
Lets say someone says Kenny teach me to read and play music, do you hand them a 500 page book on music theory?
hurting....
im sick with a high fever at times and it was making my head hurt with the complexity.
what is it doing to a newbie.
Again, noobs vary.
Some want to learn nothing.
Some want to learn everything.
Should we dumb down PS to meet the needs of only the lowest common denominator?
Of course not!
We'd disservice those who want to learn more, and not overpay for frozen spit from the largest diamond retailers.
I see PS as a store offering a wide range of product.
The product here is diamond information.
As with any store, shoppers enter, look around, ignore what they don't want and go for what they do want.
Why take half the product off the shelf?
And again, I take offense at Garry's thread title ... 99% of noobs are being disserviced?
Really? 99%? GMAB!
Let's service 100% by presenting what we've always been presenting.
People intimidated by accurate helpful information are not a reason to dumb down PS.
I dont see it as prosumers being shamed at all.So if this thread is an example of the community being “elitist” and not helpful to the newbie, and discouraging lurkers from posting, then I would say that clearly prosumers are NOT the problem. And it is a travesty that they are being shamed in this way.
The idea that community members are sharing “too much information” is almost laughable.
I agree.
But....
That does not mean we collectively can not present it in a more understandable manner without overloading people from the start.
Lets say someone says Kenny teach me to read and play music, do you hand them a 500 page book on music theory?
Good point.
But the difference is I'd give that music student lessons, one on one, in person, for an hour a week, for a long time.
On PS we can only post words on a screen and links to videos.
A forum is a poor format for learning to read and play music, but is very good for diamond education.
If a noob gets overloaded and just wants good product, service, value and to not be ripped off, it's their job so say so.
I'd respond with 5 simple words, "Just go buy an ACA."
Done.
I dont see it as prosumers being shamed at all.
The wealth of information and the level of skill of the prosumers is truly amazing. They rock!!
This forum does diamond 102, 103 and 200 205 really well if someone wants it but diamond 101, the start point needs some work I think.
It is not a slam at all to discuss it.
Like I said way back when in this thread.
There is the easy road having the prosumers do the work and there is the long road. Learning it yourself. Both are available here.
What I am saying is we can make the learning it yourself easier.