shape
carat
color
clarity

Beware of Insurance Fraud at Gübelin Gem Lab

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Today the moderator threatened to delete my message again. I'm very insecure and I need to confirm that I really have freedom of speech before I can take the next step.

Freedom of speech does not apply to: incitement, defamation, fraud, obscenity, child pornography, fighting words, and threats.

ETA: So no, you do not have the right to make baseless accusations that may harm someone's reputation, neither is your speech protected from pressuring people to "take up arms" to fight the fight with you.
 
You’ve certainly done a sterling job so far of staying absolutely nothing in many words.

Why not slowly drip feed your story and proof into a word document and cut and paste the full disclosure here (edited, concise & factual) once you’re ready? No need to slowly disclose nothing on a daily basis.
This forum claims to be able to discuss anything related to jewelry. My article "Who regulates jewelry appraisal agencies?" did not point to any specific company, just asked a question about the interests of small and medium jewelers and consumers, and was deleted. The moderator did not give any reason. Jewelry appraisal is of great interest to consumers, why can't it be discussed? What's the point of my disclosure if it only exists on this forum for 5 minutes? Your suggestion is very good, if this forum can't let me speak, I will write a book in word and sell it on ebay.
 
This forum claims to be able to discuss anything related to jewelry. My article "Who regulates jewelry appraisal agencies?" did not point to any specific company, just asked a question about the interests of small and medium jewelers and consumers, and was deleted. The moderator did not give any reason. Jewelry appraisal is of great interest to consumers, why can't it be discussed? What's the point of my disclosure if it only exists on this forum for 5 minutes? Your suggestion is very good, if this forum can't let me speak, I will write a book in word and sell it on ebay.

"...the Supreme Court reaffirmed its precedent restricting application of federal constitutional rights to governmental entities and reiterating that private landowners do not assume public obligations simply because a facility is open to the public for particular purposes or the private facility is large in size."
 
Freedom of speech does not apply to: incitement, defamation, fraud, obscenity, child pornography, fighting words, and threats.

ETA: So no, you do not have the right to make baseless accusations that may harm someone's reputation, neither is your speech protected from pressuring people to "take up arms" to fight the fight with you.

If you believe any of my current disclosures violate the law, please point it out immediately. We can discuss it clearly before going to the next step. Otherwise, you are assuming that what I have not disclosed is untrue. Your purpose is to mislead consumers. There are a large number of fake accounts on Amazon, which impersonate consumers to praise merchants in order to deceive consumers.
 
If you believe any of my current disclosures violate the law, please point it out immediately. We can discuss it clearly before going to the next step. Otherwise, you are assuming that what I have not disclosed is untrue. Your purpose is to mislead consumers. There are a large number of fake accounts on Amazon, which impersonate consumers to praise merchants in order to deceive consumers.

"U.S. Constitution does not give individuals an absolute right to enter and remain on private property to exercise their right to free expression."

So again no. PS has every right to limit members from saying whatever they want.

Also, are you seriously trying to censor people on this thread, while arguing again censorship???
 
Huh, what the heck is OP saying now? By all means write the book and sell on eBay if you think anyone will buy it.

But if you took a gem to be certified and Gubelin told you it’s some synthetic or heavily treated gem that is worthless, then maybe you did get scammed, but not by Gubelin but instead by the seller. Who buys a gem worth hundreds of thousands without a reliable cert anyway?
 
This forum claims to be able to discuss anything related to jewelry. My article "Who regulates jewelry appraisal agencies?" did not point to any specific company, just asked a question about the interests of small and medium jewelers and consumers, and was deleted. The moderator did not give any reason. Jewelry appraisal is of great interest to consumers, why can't it be discussed? What's the point of my disclosure if it only exists on this forum for 5 minutes? Your suggestion is very good, if this forum can't let me speak, I will write a book in word and sell it on ebay.

We have explained repeatedly that you cannot have more than 1 thread per topic, and each one of the deleted threads was referencing this same battle. Please stop accusing us of censorship or we will ask you to stop posting on PS. We have been more than accommodating considering.
 
To show my sincerity (I didn't mean to violate your rules), I would like to speak in a "review" way. That is, the articles I will publish will be sent to the moderators first, and the moderators will review them before publishing them. I request this voluntarily, is it okay? I'm also worried that my inappropriate remarks will cause problems for moderators.


No, we do not allow articles from outside writers on Pricescope. This is a forum for consumers to share their experiences, that is it. This is not the place for these repeated demands unfortunately.
 
Huh, what the heck is OP saying now? By all means write the book and sell on eBay if you think anyone will buy it.

But if you took a gem to be certified and Gubelin told you it’s some synthetic or heavily treated gem that is worthless, then maybe you did get scammed, but not by Gubelin but instead by the seller. Who buys a gem worth hundreds of thousands without a reliable cert anyway?

It seems he’s more interested in arguing with everyone than telling us what happened. Or maybe he’s just collecting information for his new book? Who knows
 
It seems he’s more interested in arguing with everyone than telling us what happened. Or maybe he’s just collecting information for his new book? Who knows

My first thought was if the book is listed on ebay for $1, then the net profit per book that sells would be $0.55 after all the ebay fees (if my calculations are correct). I like math.
 
My first thought was if the book is listed on ebay for $1, then the net profit per book that sells would be $0.55 after all the ebay fees (if my calculations are correct). I like math.

That's still $1 more than I would pay to read conspiratorial rants with zero basis in fact (at least from what we've seen here thus far)
 
At this point I have become convinced that OP isn't looking for actual help but instead is after an audience. As such, this subject has lost my attention. I have no interest in reading any more of this incomprehensible blabbering.
 
It’s US school holidays isn’t it? I’m beginning to think it’s a precocious teenager with a high IQ who has no one to talk to in real life.
 
The Count of Monte Cristo asked, "Who framed me?"; the priest replied: "Whoever profited from setting you up is the one who framed you."
In the same way, I, an ordinary consumer, would be willing to spend a lot of energy to "slander" Gübelin if it weren't for my interests being greatly harmed? I have said repeatedly that my appeal is: "Let Gübelin fulfill the contract and return my gems safely". Gübelin's reputation was hurt, and it was clear that competitors like SSEF would benefit the most. Who are his competitors, doesn't Gübelin know?
By the same token, PriceScope's competitors would be happiest if PriceScope were to favor Gübelin and ruin its reputation.

I have promised the moderators that I will no longer accuse the accounts of those who replied to my messages in this forum, almost all of them, are fake accounts of Gübelin. But I am not willing to be insulted and slandered by these people for no reason (they slandered and insulted me, and the beneficiary is obviously Gübelin), so I will not reply to any message in the future to deal with these people's insults and slander.

My final reminder is that there are tons of fake accounts on Amazon used to deceive consumers (https://techwireasia.com/2021/09/why-did-amazon-ban-3000-chinese-backed-online-stores/ ), when you buy jewelry, be careful!

Since my quarrel with these accounts has drained my energy, I've decided to make further disclosures next week.
 
But I am not willing to be insulted and slandered by these people for no reason (they slandered and insulted me, and the beneficiary is obviously Gübelin), so I will not reply to any message in the future to deal with these people's insults and slander.

Neither am I. Am out of here. There is an ignore function and I’ll be using that shortly.

Fwiw OP, I’ve heard of labs in China (even the somewhat should be reputable ones as they have branches in Thailand etc to be dodgy and unreliable). Gubelin sends stones to Hong Kong for testing and I trust the lab more than the China based labs.
 
Neither am I. Am out of here. There is an ignore function and I’ll be using that shortly.

Fwiw OP, I’ve heard of labs in China (even the somewhat should be reputable ones as they have branches in Thailand etc to be dodgy and unreliable). Gubelin sends stones to Hong Kong for testing and I trust the lab more than the China based labs.

Saaaaame. I'm outtie
 
This is amazing. "FELLOW CONSUMERS ARE CALLING ME OUT ON HAVING ZERO EVIDENCE FOR MY CLAIMS, SO IM TAKING MY BALL AND GOING HOME! I REFUSE TO PROVIDE MORE INFO BECAUSE IM UPSET YOU ASKED FOR INFO". Is this real life?
 
I have promised the moderators that I will no longer accuse the accounts of those who replied to my messages in this forum, almost all of them, are fake accounts of Gübelin.

He couldn’t even get to the next sentence without breaking his promise. This is actually a sad situation, but I’m exhausted from trying to engage. I hope OP has someone in the real world that can reason with him.
 
I have promised the moderators that I will no longer accuse the accounts of those who replied to my messages in this forum, almost all of them, are fake accounts of Gübelin.

I was going to join the exodus from the thread but couldn't resist.

I think I'm possibly one of the newest PS members on this thread and I've been here since 2016. I'm so pleased my masterplan to disguise myself as a jewellery fan while I sit and wait for someone with a Gubelin frustration is finally paying off - it's been a long time coming! It’s been torture having to wade through all those endless SMTB pictures and share in peoples’ joy at their new pieces while I waited :roll:
 
Last edited:
I was going to join the exodus from the thread but couldn't resist.

I think I'm possibly one of the newest PS members on this thread and I've been here since 2016. I'm so pleased my masterplan to disguise myself as a jewellery fan while I sit and wait for someone with a Gubelin frustration is finally paying off - it's been af long time coming!

major panic here
i just looked in the kitchen drawer
and im all out of tin foil to make my hat out of
 
It’s US school holidays isn’t it? I’m beginning to think it’s a precocious teenager with a high IQ who has no one to talk to in real life.

FIFY (fixed it for you). :mrgreen: ...

It’s US school holidays isn’t it?
I’m beginning to think it’s a precocious teenager with a high IQ who has no one to talk to incense, infuriate, drive up the wall, madden, bug, needle, rankle, irritate, piss off, inflame, bother, insult, irk, gall, affront, chafe, provoke, annoy, exasperate, harass, pester, and drive to suicide in real life.
 
Last edited:
Dang it! Who outed my cover that my account is fake and that I'm actually top management from Guberlin? :cool2:
 
Questioning my account for defaming Gübelin on this forum, the correct way for them to help Gübelin is to immediately notify Gübelin of my unfavorable remarks against Gübelin, and ask Gübelin to report the US local police or federal police to the police. Only the police have the power to investigate and clarify the facts. Since I'm accusing Gübelin of fraud (or stealing) it's a serious crime, it would be obviously defamation if I fabricated the facts and posted it on this forum. This forum is regulated by the US government and Gübelin can report me to the US government immediately. I am more than willing to cooperate with the investigation of U.S. law enforcement officers. I declare that I trust the U.S. government and the American people, and I accept any conclusions drawn by U.S. law enforcement officers.
And Gübelin's headquarters is in Switzerland, and the crime took place in Shanghai, so I can only report Gübelin in Switzerland or Shanghai. I did the same, reporting Gübelin for fraud (or theft) to law enforcement in Shanghai and Switzerland. I also "slandered" Gübelin to the Swiss media and Swiss MPs, and although I actively sought an investigation by the Swiss government, Gübelin did not cherish its reputation, and I repeatedly asked Gübelin to report the police to the Swiss police as well. Gübelin could sue me for defamation, but unfortunately Gübelin refused to do so.
As for how the Swiss police refused my request, my documents are not ready, today is the weekend again, I was planning to disclose it next week, but XXX thinks I am a conspiracy theory, so I have to publish these words in advance.
 
We’re going to close this thread. This forum is not run or owned by the US government, and this is not the appropriate place to attempt to get US law enforcement involved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP

Featured Topics

Top