Harriet said:Klewis,
Your English is clear to me.
Harriet said:Arcadian,
We have one more day. Say the word and I'll meet you there. The next biggie is not until October.
soberguy said:Mr. Richard Wise:
I am having a difficult time wording this, and hope it will not offend anyone I think there is a LARGE difference between spending 350,000.00 on a certified unheated Kashmir sapphire, and a 120.00 tourmaline So it is difficult for me to read this with anything more than a grain of salt. I have found you to be patient, thoughtful, and informative in both of our conversations. I would not call myself a "groupie", but if I had a decent amount of money to spend on a stone, I would most certainly visit you. I honestly think your stones are of a caliber that is prohibitive to most of this board. I personally would love to have prices listed so I don't embarass myself asking lol. As the saying goes, "if you must ask, you cannot afford it" lol! I will say, that in every high end jeweler I have visited they have been extremely polite, kind, and fun, and I am most certain you would be too!
I have often thought that we should perhaps start a new forum. "Colored Stones" is just too broad for me. Posting a thread describing a GRS certified unheated Kashmir sapphire next to one describing a $15.00 USD peridot seems completely absurd. (or a fantastic certified natural fancy green diamond ). Anyone else agree? Just a thought.
soberguy said:I have often thought that we should perhaps start a new forum. "Colored Stones" is just too broad for me. Posting a thread describing a GRS certified unheated Kashmir sapphire next to one describing a $15.00 USD peridot seems completely absurd. (or a fantastic certified natural fancy green diamond ). Anyone else agree? Just a thought.
Richard W. Wise said:Kenny, et al,
First let me say thanks for the spirited discussion of online pricing. I continue to believe that a majority of clients looking for fine gemstones do not want their business all over the internet, so, for the present, my policy continues as before. I am more than pleased to speak with anyone about any stone, either by email or phone, I even have an 800 number.
Kenny, I had never heard of you until your post the other day criticizing the way I do business. So I looked you up and read a few posts. You obviously consider yourself a high roller. So let me break this to you gently: you are playing in the bush leagues. Most of the best stones in the world are not posted on the internet, not pictures, not prices, not at all. The gem business is steeped in tradition and part of that tradition is a thing called "burning the stone." I wrote a blog on this some time ago and as Pricescope does not allow links to information, I will post it in its entirety.
GemWise
by Richard W. Wise
© 2008
“I am showing you this in absolute confidence, you understand Mr. Wise and I am asking you please not to mention this stone to anyone”.
So begins a conversation not unlike many similar conversations I have had over the past few years with dealers who specialize in ultra-rare and very high priced gemstones. The place, Las Vegas 08, the gem an extraordinary, ultra-rare fancy color diamond, the price, somewhere north of 10 million dollars.
Ultra-high-end gemstones exist, are bought and sold in their own world or rather in two contradictory worlds. Remember the Star Trek episode. The Enterprise discovers a new universe that is the flip side of our own, its just the same only everything is backwards. Sound familiar? (pictured above 6.04 carat Fancy vivid blue, internally flawless. Sold: Sotheby's Hong Kong, U.S. $7,981,835.00 world record: 1.3 Million per carat)
Burning the Stone; Mum’s the Word:
Then there is the universe of the old-line, high end dealers where discretion is the watch word. Picture richly paneled walls, men in conservative well cut suits floating down silent hallways. The reality may be the rabbit-warren at 580 5th Avenue but, hey, lets maintain the illusion.
“At all costs they avoid burning the stone”, says a prominent dealer, “If the price, even the fact of the stone’s existence becomes too public, some buyers will shy away”. This is known in the trade as burning.
This dealer cites the example of the 76.45 carat Archduke Diamond named for the Austrian Arch Duke Joseph August. Molina a high-end Phoenix Jeweler, made a very public show of owning the stone even allowing singer Celine Dion to wear the Archduke on a TV special. In the dealer's world, this is very bad form. One dealer who was interested in the stone for a client declined to show it once he found out about all the hype surrounding the gem. “Our clients wouldn’t be interested.” The stone had been burned.
So Kenny, there you are. If you ever have the opportunity to enter this world, I suggest that arrogantly demanding that they change their way of doing business to suit you, won't get you past the receptionist.
Best of luck,
tourmaline_lover said:soberguy said:I have often thought that we should perhaps start a new forum. "Colored Stones" is just too broad for me. Posting a thread describing a GRS certified unheated Kashmir sapphire next to one describing a $15.00 USD peridot seems completely absurd. (or a fantastic certified natural fancy green diamond ). Anyone else agree? Just a thought.
Pricescope is really a diamond site and is mostly about diamond education from what people have told me and from what I see (one of the mods can correct me if I'm wrong). I think Colored Stones was mostly started as a nice option for people that rather talk about something else besides diamonds. However what I am seeing is that CS is becoming it's own animal, almost akin to other gemological sites that do focus on gems other than diamonds. Many PS'ers never step foot in here, or even care about Colored Stones, but the ones that do find a wealth of information. I love Colored Stones and I'm in this section 99% of the time because truth be told, I could care less about white diamonds. However, since CS has become it's own animal, I do agree it has become a bit too broad. I would hope it would be expanded into subforums, like colored diamonds, colored gems, treatments, etc. . . but that's not my decision to make, although I do think it would coax some very good scientific minds over here.
Richard W. Wise said:Kenny, et al,
First let me say thanks for the spirited discussion of online pricing. I continue to believe that a majority of clients looking for fine gemstones do not want their business all over the internet, so, for the present, my policy continues as before. I am more than pleased to speak with anyone about any stone, either by email or phone, I even have an 800 number.
Kenny, I had never heard of you until your post the other day criticizing the way I do business. So I looked you up and read a few posts. You obviously consider yourself a high roller. So let me break this to you gently: you are playing in the bush leagues. Most of the best stones in the world are not posted on the internet, not pictures, not prices, not at all. The gem business is steeped in tradition and part of that tradition is a thing called "burning the stone." I wrote a blog on this some time ago and as Pricescope does not allow links to information, I will post it in its entirety.
LovingDiamonds said:Why ask for opinions if you had a closed mind to this? Actually, it's not "a majority of clients ...... not want their business all over the internet" because the internet is an anonymous place. Nobody would know who bought a stone unless you published it on your website or they told others! It's only the price that would be on the internet and to be honest this is more of you not wanting your business all over the internet.
klewis said:LovingDiamonds said:Why ask for opinions if you had a closed mind to this? Actually, it's not "a majority of clients ...... not want their business all over the internet" because the internet is an anonymous place. Nobody would know who bought a stone unless you published it on your website or they told others! It's only the price that would be on the internet and to be honest this is more of you not wanting your business all over the internet.
LD- I could be wrong here, but my understanding of the "Burning the Stone" blog quote was that it was not only that the buyer should be anonymous but that the stones existence should be kept under wraps as well.
LovingDiamonds said:klewis said:LovingDiamonds said:By the way, I think your grasp of the English language is superb and am genuinely surprised to find out it's not!
klewis said:LovingDiamonds said:klewis said:LovingDiamonds said:By the way, I think your grasp of the English language is superb and am genuinely surprised to find out it's not!
Thanks LD - I was brung up right but it's my sentence structure that is my downfall and I am aware it can cause confusion to some.
Richard W. Wise said:TL,
I thought I was pretty clear. Most of the dealers who buy and sell the best of the best do not post pictures or prices on the internet. In fact, often when I am searching for something particularly rare and fine I might be sent images, but I must promise not to send those images to anyone of publish them on the internet. You read the quote at the beginning of the blog post: "Burning the stone" is a real concern. The internet is the brave new world, not the whole world.
A couple of points about images: You tell me I should get a better photographer. Most of the images on my site are taken by either Jeff Scovil or Robert Weldon. That is not a "claim" that is a fact. Weldon does most of GIA's work, you see him in G&G. Scovil has done a majority of the covers for Mineralogical Record, Colored Stone and you see his photos published everywhere. They are top professionals, but the images are often inaccurate.
You say that you like Gene Flanagan's images, but you carefully avoid acknowledging Gene's own statements that images are misleading and inaccurate. In fact, just about every professional on this forum has said the same thing at one time or another, but you seem deaf to the facts. Obviously, once you acknowledge what everyone knows to be true you would have a hard time justifying your minute critiques of images posted on the forum. If a professional appraiser attempted to appraise a gem or jewelry item by only looking at images, he would be called unprofessional. Since I have no idea who you are, I will assume you are not a professional, but since you do know that images are inaccurate, you are acting irresponsibly and giving bad advice and what's more, you know it.
PrecisionGem said:I didn't say all pictures are misleading or inaccurate. My point was it's difficult to compare images from different sources.
Which of these two Mali garnets has the better color?
Actually they are both the same picture. One is right from the camera, the other is juiced up a bit. I do suspect that some vendors juice up the images, so how can one really compare two stones from different vendors?