ericg
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 4
So I''ve done the research here on PS, visited some downtown Chicago jewelers like Dimend Scassi, M Martin & Co, and Windy City Diamonds to look at princess stones just under one carat. Now I''m stuck deciding between online jewelers (like Good Old Gold) who post multiple 3rd party reports on cut and light performance which give me piece of mind, or going with a local reputable jeweler like M Martin who hand selects stones for best of cut without such reports, just GIA...
Being an engineer, I initially liked all the numbers and tools. I asked at M Martin & Co about evaluations like ASET, Sarin, AGS0, etc., and he talked about a trade show where a guy put an ugly stone in one, and the machine gave it an excellent grading. I understand that of course those tools have some value, but is he right that they can''t really be trusted? (Maybe even just tools friendly to jewelers wanting to push stones) It made sense to me that that''s why the GIA for example doesn''t use such tools in grading... Is that thinking right?
It seems that princess cuts are a difficult stone to give absolute advice on, so even if I post all the specs here that won''t truly help. At M Martin I was shown the differences between a great princess cut and a poor/common one. I can notice big differences, but I''m afraid I can''t tell the difference between an ideal cut princess and just a very good cut princess he''d show me.
It seems like it''s all about the eyes, and that''s why I like all the multiple reports at GOG or knowing it''s a AGS0 ideal princesses. But maybe I need to just trust my own eyes to get it "good enough" in-person and trust the judgment of M Martin & Co (family business for 60+ years) whom other people have and been satisfied by looking at reviews. I guess it''s just hard for me to get over the barrier of trusting the jeweler''s judgment of what''s a good stone and good price for it beyond my amateur-trained eyes with a mind build for numbers and reports...
I''m conflicted, any words of wisdom to help steer me in either direction?
Being an engineer, I initially liked all the numbers and tools. I asked at M Martin & Co about evaluations like ASET, Sarin, AGS0, etc., and he talked about a trade show where a guy put an ugly stone in one, and the machine gave it an excellent grading. I understand that of course those tools have some value, but is he right that they can''t really be trusted? (Maybe even just tools friendly to jewelers wanting to push stones) It made sense to me that that''s why the GIA for example doesn''t use such tools in grading... Is that thinking right?
It seems that princess cuts are a difficult stone to give absolute advice on, so even if I post all the specs here that won''t truly help. At M Martin I was shown the differences between a great princess cut and a poor/common one. I can notice big differences, but I''m afraid I can''t tell the difference between an ideal cut princess and just a very good cut princess he''d show me.
It seems like it''s all about the eyes, and that''s why I like all the multiple reports at GOG or knowing it''s a AGS0 ideal princesses. But maybe I need to just trust my own eyes to get it "good enough" in-person and trust the judgment of M Martin & Co (family business for 60+ years) whom other people have and been satisfied by looking at reviews. I guess it''s just hard for me to get over the barrier of trusting the jeweler''s judgment of what''s a good stone and good price for it beyond my amateur-trained eyes with a mind build for numbers and reports...
I''m conflicted, any words of wisdom to help steer me in either direction?