arjunajane
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2008
- Messages
- 9,758
Date: 9/25/2009 1:07:47 PM
Author: ma re
After reading for like half an hour, let me see if I got it right. If you get a cushion, you''ll do the first design, and if you get an oval, you''ll do the second one? Well, which of the two designs would you rather have? Which would you wear more? Also, note that the ring in LM photo has an octagon cut stone (some sort of a scissor cut, I''d say), so doing the same design with an elongated cushion might not result with the same effect. Also, try to check (if possible), what is the size of the center stone in that photo - seems to me like it''s at least 8 mm, and doing the same design with a 6.5 or 7 mm stone, wouldn''t result in the same proportions.
Both designs are lovely, but they''re quite different from eachother. While the first one is more dressy and with a contemporary feel, the 2nd one is more inspired by ancient arts, and might even be more suitable for casual wear.
If I misunderstood something, just say the word
ha ha, oh ma re! Sorry if I confused you.
Yes, if I get a larger cushion, I will do the diamond 3 stone (with changes).
If I got the smaller oval, my intention was to bezel it to offset the size.
You''re spot on - I''d rather have the diamond 3 stone, and I''d rather have a larger stone, hence my decision. I guess it seemed kinda obvious, but this is why I need to ask you folks sometimes!
That 3 stone ring (well, 5 stone), is just a "concept" - it is only intended to show I want step cut traps, a sapphire centre, and similar proportions centre stone to diamond-wise.
I won''t be having LM make the ring, and the end result will likely be completely different.
To start with, I will have a thicker shank in high kt YG, likely with only plat in the head. I may also bezel set the side stones..
Anyways..those details I will consult you later