chere
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2021
- Messages
- 303
It’s been a crazy week. I was really upset that my BGD 5 stone ring missed my birthday over the weekend and my fear that it would miss the holidays was actually playing out when I saw the CADs earlier this week. I bought a 5 stone ring from Costco as my plan B since there was a sale. Costco’s I color VS2 or better wasn’t that far off from the BGD H VS1 stones right? And if I didn’t like it, I could return it directly to any Costco warehouse.
I couldn’t believe my eyes when I opened the package. The stone tint was comparable or whiter than my F solitaire. The top 3 stones were lively and the 2 end stones were nice but meh. They are eye clean. I’m not good with my loupe but I couldn’t see anything. I got out my calipers they are slightly graduated at 4.7mm, 4.62mm, 4.5mm. I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me since it was late and the indoor lighting makes my F solitaire look warm and cloudy.
The next morning on the drive into the city with the DH, I kept telling him there’s no way there’s are Es. They are icy white. I dropped the ring off to get appraised and I was shocked and happily thrilled they graded the stones as E/F, Good to Very Good, VVS1-VS1, 1.9ctw (size 5).
I think this was a deal for $5,000CAD / $4,000USD after the $1,500 CAD / $1,000 USD sale. The DH even suggested I should buy a few more rings to see what I get and keep the ring I like.
I think this process has been a blessing in disguise and it has helped confirm what I like. I know I’m color sensitive. I was hoping I wouldn’t be bothered by H color since they were super ideals. But I now think tint bothers me more than the cut. I can see the stones are not perfectly symmetrical and the crown heights are not even but only when I look close. They sparkle plenty and I see icy white stones from the corner of my eye when I move my hands.
These are not the super ideals or the setting I wanted but they certainly will do for now!
BTW, Costco’s return policy is still valid if you resize the ring within the limit listed in the product details. I noticed some rings can be sized 1 up or down and others say they cannot be resized. And you need to get the setting inspected every 6 months. https://www.costco.com/jewelry-buying-guide-faq.html
I couldn’t believe my eyes when I opened the package. The stone tint was comparable or whiter than my F solitaire. The top 3 stones were lively and the 2 end stones were nice but meh. They are eye clean. I’m not good with my loupe but I couldn’t see anything. I got out my calipers they are slightly graduated at 4.7mm, 4.62mm, 4.5mm. I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me since it was late and the indoor lighting makes my F solitaire look warm and cloudy.
The next morning on the drive into the city with the DH, I kept telling him there’s no way there’s are Es. They are icy white. I dropped the ring off to get appraised and I was shocked and happily thrilled they graded the stones as E/F, Good to Very Good, VVS1-VS1, 1.9ctw (size 5).
I think this was a deal for $5,000CAD / $4,000USD after the $1,500 CAD / $1,000 USD sale. The DH even suggested I should buy a few more rings to see what I get and keep the ring I like.
I think this process has been a blessing in disguise and it has helped confirm what I like. I know I’m color sensitive. I was hoping I wouldn’t be bothered by H color since they were super ideals. But I now think tint bothers me more than the cut. I can see the stones are not perfectly symmetrical and the crown heights are not even but only when I look close. They sparkle plenty and I see icy white stones from the corner of my eye when I move my hands.
These are not the super ideals or the setting I wanted but they certainly will do for now!
BTW, Costco’s return policy is still valid if you resize the ring within the limit listed in the product details. I noticed some rings can be sized 1 up or down and others say they cannot be resized. And you need to get the setting inspected every 6 months. https://www.costco.com/jewelry-buying-guide-faq.html
Last edited: