Expert opinion please -- 2 stones (3 ct, SI2, I, AGSL000)

[Mark2014]

Does one stone look better than the other?
Stone 1:

 

[Mark2014]

Re: Expert opinion please -- 2 stones (3 ct, SI2, I, AGSL000

Stone 2:

 

[Dreamer_D]

Re: Expert opinion please -- 2 stones (3 ct, SI2, I, AGSL000

I think the stones might be too large for the scopes which is causing the appearance of leakage in the central area... An AGS0 with such lovely patterning that looks the way those stones look in the real life photos would not have leakage like that.

So, ignoring that photographic artefact, I could not choose based on those images. Both look fine to me as far as that type of imaging goes for me. So I need more information.

Can you post the information from the lab reports?

Also, have you seen them? Where are the grade-making inclusions located?

 

[Mark2014]

Re: Expert opinion please -- 2 stones (3 ct, SI2, I, AGSL000

Thank you. I really appreciate your time and opinion.

Stone 1:

AGS#: 104051690005
Report Type: The Platinum Light Performance Diamond Quality® Document
Shape and Style: Round Brilliant
Measurements: 9.18 - 9.23 x 5.70 mm
Cut Grade: AGS Ideal 0
Color Grade: AGS 2.5 (I)
Clarity Grade: AGS 6 (SI2)
Carat Weight 2.985
Fluorescence: Negligible
Comments: Additional clouds are not shown.

Light Performance: 0
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Table: 57.0%
Crown Angle: 35.5
Crown Height: 15.4%
Girdle: Faceted, 2.0% to 4.2%
Pavilion Angle: 40.6
Pavilion Depth: 42.8%
Star Length: 52%
Lower Girdle Length: 78%
Total Depth: 61.9%
Culet: Pointed
http://www.agslab.com/pdf_sync_reports/104051690005-PLDQR.PDF


Stone 2:
AGS#: 104060298008
Report Type: The Platinum Light Performance Diamond Quality® Document
Shape and Style: Round Brilliant
Measurements: 9.19 - 9.24 x 5.69 mm
Cut Grade: AGS Ideal 0
Color Grade: AGS 2.5 (I)
Clarity Grade: AGS 6 (SI2)
Carat Weight 2.993
Fluorescence: Negligible
Comments: "AGSL 104060298008 H&A" has been inscribed on the girdle of this diamond.
Additional twinning wisps and surface graining are not shown.

Light Performance: 0
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Table: 57.6%
Crown Angle: 35.1
Crown Height: 15.0%
Girdle: Faceted, 1.8% to 4.1%
Pavilion Angle: 40.8
Pavilion Depth: 43.2%
Star Length: 51%
Lower Girdle Length: 76%
Total Depth: 61.8%
Culet: Pointed
http://www.agslab.com/pdf_sync_reports/104060298008-PLDQR.PDF

 

[Mark2014]

Re: Expert opinion please -- 2 stones (3 ct, SI2, I, AGSL000

I have not seen the diamonds in person myself (yet) but they have been confirmed eye-clean