captainmcgee
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2010
- Messages
- 329
User an appraiser as well - its a no brainer - for the cost vs the piece of mind.mif_ said:Thanks Annie- will do.
I am just a little worried due to the fact I won't be able to see the stone before it is set.
I think to save money it is probably worth the risk.
bean said:I am confused by this... I have a 3.18 I si2 that is eye clean... Even though I KNOW where the inclusions are I can not see them unless I put the stone much much closer to my eyes. Also due to the cut of the stone (and especially when it's clean... It is a huge disco ball of light!) I think it makes it very hard to see anything.
But my question is.. And I think this is relevant to the thread... Ok take a one carat diamond that is an i1. Take those same inclusions- exactly the same size and shape and put them in a 4 carat diamond- is it an i1? Are inclusions relative??? I guess why I'm asking is that in a smaller stone with the inclusions closer together the inclusion to clean-part-of-the-diamond ratio is closer together but when you put them in a larger stone there is more "clean part of the diamond" so the ratio difference is much larger..... So if a 1 carat si1 can be eye clean.. Why can't a 4 carat si1?????
diamondseeker2006 said:If I were in your situation I'd have Jonathan at Good Old Gold find stones for you. If there are any to look at, he can call them in and take close up photos, xrays, and videos for you. He will also be honest about the eye clean issue. He is in NY, and I am sure he has sent stones to Leon before.
Rockdiamond said:mif- I think it's very important for you to find a way to look at seom stones first hand.
As far as the SI issue- I say, it's a great idea to include SI1 and even Si2 in your search.
Not to say you will find one that satisfies you- but you just might.
There's been mention of "problems" with SI stones.
Without quesiton, careful visual inspection by a professional is crucial- however there are many SI and even I1 stones with imperfectiopns that pose no durability concerns whatsoever- and also may have the imperfecitons dispersed and located in places that do imperceptable damage to the overall brilliance of the stone.
In terms of the cut grade- again, it's important for you to see some stones to get the idea what you're looking at.
you may very well find a VG cut grade which was downgraded from EX for reasons virtually invisible- certainly there are stones with minor polish defects that have no durability issues, and require strong magnification to see.
.
Find one using the top tab <Resources> Appraisers. There are some listed there who frequently post helpful stuff on Pricescope on the right hand side. I highly recomend them.mif_ said:Sorry for the naivety- would I have them go and see the stone or have it sent to them?
Also how would I go about finding one?
Thanks
elle_chris said:I'm going to be the voice of dissent here.
While I understand you want a large stone, with your budget I'd stick to an F, VS clarity one.
You have to remember, that everyone's vision is different. Even if you can't see the inclusion in an SI stone, chances are someone else will in a 4ct. That may not matter to you, but if I were spending this much money on a diamond, I'd want it to be totally eyeclean, to myself, my spouse, my family, friends, everyone. And if it is eyeclean, I'd asky myself how? What else is wrong with it? Clouds causing issues, feathers, etc.
Also color. The larger you go the easier it is to see. I can spot color in 1ct stone at I and below and I am not at all color sensitive.
Again, if you want a a very white diamond an H won't do it at 4ct and above no matter what. You will be able to see some tint in certain lighting.
Regarding cut. It's going to be very difficult to find a super ideal in that size. I wouldn't worry too much and H&A's but would work with someone who sells ideals and understands what to look for in a well cut stone.
In other words, I'd rather have a 3.50ct colorless VSS,VS clarity stone, then a 4ct plus with a lower color and SI clarity.
You're spending a ton of money on a diamond, why not have the best of both worlds? A large stone with top color and clarity?
Dreamer_D said:elle_chris said:I'm going to be the voice of dissent here.
While I understand you want a large stone, with your budget I'd stick to an F, VS clarity one.
You have to remember, that everyone's vision is different. Even if you can't see the inclusion in an SI stone, chances are someone else will in a 4ct. That may not matter to you, but if I were spending this much money on a diamond, I'd want it to be totally eyeclean, to myself, my spouse, my family, friends, everyone. And if it is eyeclean, I'd asky myself how? What else is wrong with it? Clouds causing issues, feathers, etc.
Also color. The larger you go the easier it is to see. I can spot color in 1ct stone at I and below and I am not at all color sensitive.
Again, if you want a a very white diamond an H won't do it at 4ct and above no matter what. You will be able to see some tint in certain lighting.
Regarding cut. It's going to be very difficult to find a super ideal in that size. I wouldn't worry too much and H&A's but would work with someone who sells ideals and understands what to look for in a well cut stone.
In other words, I'd rather have a 3.50ct colorless VSS,VS clarity stone, then a 4ct plus with a lower color and SI clarity.
You're spending a ton of money on a diamond, why not have the best of both worlds? A large stone with top color and clarity?
I actually agree about all of this. Drop size a weensy bit and stick with VS clarity. I might be ok with G color personally, but hae not seen stones so large so cannot say. Mif have you compared in person a 4ct to a 3.5ct to get a feel for the difference in size? I think that for your budget, you should get a diamond that is *perfect* in every respect when it comes to cut (H&A not necessary), clarity and color. Size is then determined by budget. If you plan on a halo setting anyways, the size differences will be less noticable remember, as the exta 2mm+ in diameter makes the difference in carat a smaller overall percentage of the rings footprint on your hand.
Add some strong blue fluoro in a G or H and you will be laughing all the way to the bank!mif_ said:Dreamer_D said:elle_chris said:I'm going to be the voice of dissent here.
While I understand you want a large stone, with your budget I'd stick to an F, VS clarity one.
You have to remember, that everyone's vision is different. Even if you can't see the inclusion in an SI stone, chances are someone else will in a 4ct. That may not matter to you, but if I were spending this much money on a diamond, I'd want it to be totally eyeclean, to myself, my spouse, my family, friends, everyone. And if it is eyeclean, I'd asky myself how? What else is wrong with it? Clouds causing issues, feathers, etc.
Also color. The larger you go the easier it is to see. I can spot color in 1ct stone at I and below and I am not at all color sensitive.
Again, if you want a a very white diamond an H won't do it at 4ct and above no matter what. You will be able to see some tint in certain lighting.
Regarding cut. It's going to be very difficult to find a super ideal in that size. I wouldn't worry too much and H&A's but would work with someone who sells ideals and understands what to look for in a well cut stone.
In other words, I'd rather have a 3.50ct colorless VSS,VS clarity stone, then a 4ct plus with a lower color and SI clarity.
You're spending a ton of money on a diamond, why not have the best of both worlds? A large stone with top color and clarity?
I actually agree about all of this. Drop size a weensy bit and stick with VS clarity. I might be ok with G color personally, but hae not seen stones so large so cannot say. Mif have you compared in person a 4ct to a 3.5ct to get a feel for the difference in size? I think that for your budget, you should get a diamond that is *perfect* in every respect when it comes to cut (H&A not necessary), clarity and color. Size is then determined by budget. If you plan on a halo setting anyways, the size differences will be less noticable remember, as the exta 2mm+ in diameter makes the difference in carat a smaller overall percentage of the rings footprint on your hand.
Thanks for all the advice. I just don't feel like I want to drop the ct. I have compared a 3.5ct to a 4ct. My mother has a 3.5 G colour RB, she has been looking with me and I have worn hers. Hers is so bright and colourless that I feel that G would probably be ok. My partner is keen on a 4ct as am I. I imagine we may need to up the budget a little bit. I wasn't going to have a halo so I wanted to stick to around 4ct.
I guess it will also depend on whether or not I notice the difference that much when I go and look at more stones. I think the lesson I have learnt here is hands on experience is invaluable.
Thanks again everyone!
Are you using the pricescope search engine?mif_ said:Can anyone give me advice on this stone? What should I be seeing here that doesn't make it a good purchase?
http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-search?filter_id=0&track=bbt#diamonds_pid=LD01818232
mif_ said:Can anyone give me advice on this stone? What should I be seeing here that doesn't make it a good purchase?
http://www.bluenile.com/diamond-search?filter_id=0&track=bbt#diamonds_pid=LD01818232
Do a search all and do not use HCA (unless you are searching in house stones) because if the vendor has not loaded the data - then none come up.mif_ said:Yes, I am using HCA and searched the pricescope search and nothing came up. I meant other than HCA analysis. Is there anything else that I should be looking out for when picking stones.
tradergirl said:115K for 4ct. you say?
How about 40K for a VVS 5 ct.? You could have the thing recut to modern standards at that price although I wouldn't do that.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Antique-6-00-Diamond-Platinum-Filigree-Engagement-Ring-/280575608757?pt=Vintage_Fine_Jewelry&hash=item41539c07b5
antelope1 said:Also, Mif, I seem to recall that your budget is $80-$100k? To echo what everyone else has been saying -- you must see it in person before making such a large investment!
There are two ways to do this:
Send finalists to a local appraiser and review them prior to purchase. If you live outside the US (or outside the country in which your vendor is located), this may be problematic. I haven't investigated how customs work in this case. Since the finalists will be shipped with an astronomical insurance value (if you are viewing 3 finalists each worth $100k = $300k in insured value!) may set off red flags at customs. Anyone in the trade know how this works?
Fly to NYC or where ever your vendor is located and schedule an office visit. I've been to both GOG and ERD (and I'm sure most other vendors will have this equipment) -- and they have 70x microscopes, ASET, Idealscopes, etc that you can use to examine the diamond in more detail. Yes, this will eat into your diamond budget -- but just a little. If you are traveling within the US, it will probably be no more than $1500 for travel -- internationally, budget perhaps $5k for travel, depending on where you are.
For a $100k diamond, I think most vendors will work with you (very closely and provide good service) to find exactly what you want. Why not reach out to a few via phone and see which vendors seem to be responsive? Also, Garry will not say this because he is a nice guy -- but he is a vendor located in Australia (which may be closer to you than the US). I don't see online inventory, but you can email him through his website to see what he has.
Oh, and I did a quick search and found these (all virtual diamonds, can be called in by other vendors)
4.17 ct, H, VS2, HCA = 1.5: http://www.eternitydiamonds.com/diamond_detail.php?id=373004
4.24 ct, H, VS2 (no cert online, so no HCA): http://www.abazias.com/database/NewDiamondInfo.asp?stock=82978672
There were many more in your budget just over 4 cts (I made the specs more restrictive than what you had before, but an H VS2 is definitely possible in terms of quality): http://tiny.cc/e2nx215pz6