Halo - WF vs, Bev K ..

[MommaChristine]

I''ve been admiring this Bev K for quite awhile now .. I love the setting, but am not so fond of this matching band. I''d like my rings to sit flush so that dilemma is really holding me back. I''ve also recently came across this new halo from WF .. the "Amphora" which I like, but am concerned that it''ll be too bulky and it''s not quite as petite or feminine as the Bev K setting which is something I''d like.

So .. which do ya''ll prefer and why?!

 

[EricaR]

I love that Bev K setting. Could you go to a local dealer that carries it and try it on with various wedding bands? That way you could play with different bands until you find a look you like.

 

[Tuckins1]

I actually like the whiteflash one better. It looks to be less bulky to me.

 

[Tacori E-ring]

Are you sure a band will sit flush with the WF setting?

 

[tyty333]

Personally I like the WF setting because I''m not big on the businest going on under the head with the Bev K (but thats a personal thing).

I think if you snoop around a lot on this site you should be able to find some examples with wedding bands on settings like the WF one.

I''ll see if I can find some...

 

[MommaChristine]

I don''t think a band would sit flush with either but the Bev K makes that semi-slanted wedding band that kind works which you can see on this site ..

http://www.topazery.com/antique-jewelry-item-rg2457.htm

I''m just not sure how I feel about the way it looks on the hand. I know Pearlmans will send a sample ring, but I''ve never heard of them sending a sample SET so I don''t know.

As for going to a local dealer .. I''ve never seen any Bev K pieces around. Any suggestions on what stores to try? I live in Virginia if that helps any!

Thanks so much for ya''lls input!