- Joined
- Jan 9, 2006
- Messages
- 6,723
Cutting is the issue. huge supplies of rough and hige shortages of polished.
But the biggest factor is skilled polishers - 60% are on strike and 20% went back to villages to escape Covid risks.
How about the fact that the rap sheet has gone up and Lab Grown diamonds are following suit....
From my "on the ground" perspective, LG melee has not increased.
Larger stones have- again, basedon Rap.....
no grounds for that other than avarice
WOuld that be Natural or Lab grown avarice![]()
@Garry H (Cut Nut) , you may be recollecting their campaign against use of "GIA Certified Gemologists." They're okay with companies stating they have GIA Graduate Gemologists or GIA Gemologists on staff as long as it's accurate and verifiable.
I believe GIA object to this terminology?
They're okay with companies stating they have GIA Graduate Gemologists or GIA Gemologists on staff as long as it's accurate and verifiable.
I don't know if we could verify how GIA feels.......
I'd bet you'd recommend sellers use the correct terminology- GIA Graduate Gemologist.
I did see it John- but I thought you had another source because it proves my point. The phrase "GIA Gemologist" is not on the approved list.
GIA Graduate Gemologists, Accredited Jewelry Professionals, Gemologists, Graduate Jewelers, or Jewelry Design & Technology graduates
I did see it John- but I thought you had another source because it proves my point. The phrase "GIA Gemologist" is not on the approved list.
@Rockdiamond I don't think it's ambiguous.Now that you put it that way I see the ambiguity @DejaWiz.
Can we agree that the phrase “Our unbiased GIA gemelogists” would likely cause GIA to refine their standards And clear up the ambiguity?
I interpret this...
Can we all agree the term “unbiased GIA gemologist” is deceptive????