- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 25,228
soberguy|1415251862|3778397 said:GRS not trustworthy???!!!! Millions upon millions of dollars at auction would strongly disagree with that!!!! Here is a 2.5 million dollar necklace as an example of their reputation...
GRS is a reputable lab. I think the problem arises at their ridiculous metaphors used to describe color and quality of gems, which is done mostly for the trade. AGL's prestige report is highly scientific and unbiased towards the gem trade. For a very expensive piece, to accurately describe quality, I would always go with AGL first.
Treatment is only one aspect of a piece, which I believe GRS can handle fine, and origin as well. I have my doubts with their ability to properly judge other qualities which can make a piece worth $1 or $1,000,000. Color is of significant importance for example, and when I see brownish red rubies described as "pigeon blood," or "magnificent red" or a variety of blue sapphires in all kinds of saturations, all described as "velvet cornflower," it's disconcerting.
I wish more labs would take on AGL's lead, but then I understand the trade wanting to use GRS more because this ill-descriptive, flowery language, is tempting to put in front of a consumer. It's more profitable to GRS obviously.