hoofbeats95
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2008
- Messages
- 1,469
If I'm honest I was probably never happy with my ring. I'm getting married in April and have to choose a wedding band. I thought maybe now was a good time to think about a reset.
I have a .72 princess set in a simple cathedral setting. I'd like the stone to look bigger. This weekend I tried on some rings at a mall store to see how I felt about different settings. One of them was the same size center stone as mine, with channel set princesses. The ring was a cathedral too, but the shoulders didn't go up as high and the diamond was set higher. The stone looked bigger. They have that setting with G-H, VS diamonds and a matching band. The diamonds look very nice. They make my F center stone look yellow! How is that possible??? I like the setting quite a bit, but I'm not sure it's "enough". I also don't like the jeweler there. She set my current setting and did a crappy job. I also just had a created colored stone set by her and am not impressed. I'd prefer her to not do the reset.
The ring was very much like this: http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/channel-set-diamond-engagement-ring-1083.htm However, I think the WF version is too bulky. I feel like the metal in the channel is too much. Specifically on the matching band.
I looked at BGD, but they don't have a setting quite like this. They do have the princess truth though. http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/home/ring-details/?product_id=5500 I'd like to see a hand shot of this. I've searched PS high and low for a hand shot and can't find one. I did find a similar ring in this thread: https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/its-arrived-safely-in-oz-avc-in-bgd-setting.148186// It is the truth but not princess sides. I don't quite like the severe taper to the band. Does anyone know if the princess version does this? The other issue is I don't think BGD has a matching band for this ring yet. Which may mean it is probably going to cost a pretty penny to be the first one?
I don't have to have side stones. Though now I'm feeling like a diamond band against the plain metal of my ering looks "off". I also don't like all the scratches on the band of my ering right now. So side stones would hide that. I do think that the stone needs to sit higher, or the shoulders not come up so high. I'm open to all suggestions! Help me out PS!
I have a .72 princess set in a simple cathedral setting. I'd like the stone to look bigger. This weekend I tried on some rings at a mall store to see how I felt about different settings. One of them was the same size center stone as mine, with channel set princesses. The ring was a cathedral too, but the shoulders didn't go up as high and the diamond was set higher. The stone looked bigger. They have that setting with G-H, VS diamonds and a matching band. The diamonds look very nice. They make my F center stone look yellow! How is that possible??? I like the setting quite a bit, but I'm not sure it's "enough". I also don't like the jeweler there. She set my current setting and did a crappy job. I also just had a created colored stone set by her and am not impressed. I'd prefer her to not do the reset.
The ring was very much like this: http://www.whiteflash.com/engagement-rings/diamond-settings/channel-set-diamond-engagement-ring-1083.htm However, I think the WF version is too bulky. I feel like the metal in the channel is too much. Specifically on the matching band.
I looked at BGD, but they don't have a setting quite like this. They do have the princess truth though. http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/home/ring-details/?product_id=5500 I'd like to see a hand shot of this. I've searched PS high and low for a hand shot and can't find one. I did find a similar ring in this thread: https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/its-arrived-safely-in-oz-avc-in-bgd-setting.148186// It is the truth but not princess sides. I don't quite like the severe taper to the band. Does anyone know if the princess version does this? The other issue is I don't think BGD has a matching band for this ring yet. Which may mean it is probably going to cost a pretty penny to be the first one?
I don't have to have side stones. Though now I'm feeling like a diamond band against the plain metal of my ering looks "off". I also don't like all the scratches on the band of my ering right now. So side stones would hide that. I do think that the stone needs to sit higher, or the shoulders not come up so high. I'm open to all suggestions! Help me out PS!