StarRHnegative
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2018
- Messages
- 67
Seeing as OP has called us all "re*ards" and continues to accuase whitewave and others (including me) of being Ed or his wife, I assume this thread will be locked shortly.It will be impossible for anyone to give you mpre advice if you don't want to share your photos of these gems or more facts about the transaction without the hyperbole. I don't think anyone will want to now that you've insulted all the people who participate in this forum. You started out with people sympathetic to you and wanting to help and have now swayed that sumpathy to the vendor. If your rudeness co tinues I hope @Ella comes by to lock down this thread.
This. The exact prices and info were in the emails that OP copied and pasted!I’m not a gem expert nor a business person but even I knew you were the one who set the $333 price simply because it’s not a number one would be quoted for a setting.
Plus you told us, “I can do a simple setting for 333, though that is under my cost, but I’m dealing in gems, the settings are just a post-sales service (as long as they are simple).”
Whitewave I highly suspect you are Ed himself. How would you know if 333 was my idea or not? This without a doubt proves you are him or his wife. Thats so shady!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The 333 was my idea after the agreement of finding the specified stones at 2k and 7k as mentioned above.
This was privately discussed between Ed and I alone. How would a random member on pricescope know these intimate details? Shadyyyyyyy!!!!
Weird number requirements?
If finding finding a stone between 3 carats to 5 carats is 'weird number equirements' .....then.. Lol
Regardless of my beliefs. Language. Etc. None of that matters in a business transaction.
What many of you are failing to see. You are looking at this from an emotional feminine perspective.
Instead of logical mind based of agreement and contract.
Where I was the victim of fraud or a huge mistake that is not being rightfully addressed, even according to his online policy.
Period.
End of discussion.
Gosh, I feel sorry for Ed.
Edit: tangentially related, whatever happened to that one poster that was promoting him at every turn? Something in the sky with sapphires, I think, was the username? This thread made me realize we haven’t seen him around in awhile...
Regardless of my beliefs. Language. Etc. None of that matters in a business transaction.
What many of you are failing to see. You are looking at this from an emotional feminine perspective.
Instead of logical mind based of agreement and contract.
Where I was the victim of fraud or a huge mistake that is not being rightfully addressed, even according to his online policy.
Period.
End of discussion.
Yup, this post shows the kind of BS Ed has put up with for a year.
This is a thread for the ages. Best posts ever. We should make a post on hangout for threads not to miss.
Whitewave, when should we send congrats on your wedding and where should we send the gifts, you being married to Ed now and all??? Oh wait...maybe you ARE Ed! You and that crafty feminine brain and sussing out the 333 and all. Is 333 the new 666? Is it another millennial thing? Like the Rh- thing? What does it all mean???
@cmd2014 I agree with you about the policies. My guess is that this particular arrangement came with extra conditions since Ed we sourcing something that he didn't have online, etc. However, if that isn't the case, then yes it should be subject to the same eturn policies as stated.