How do these IS, ASET Pics look?

[Myname1ssteve]

I spent many weeks reading on this wonderful site my first diamond was a steep and deep gia xxx's with a 6.2 hca and even after i figured this out the seller keep trying to convince me it was a perfect stone, anyway i refused to have them ship me the initial stone and scoured the web for a replacement, it was hard to get my hands on but ill have it next week and wanted some feedback. thanks for any help!

AGS#: 104045793007

Measurements: 8.17 - 8.23 x 5.03 mm
Cut Grade: AGS Ideal 0
Color Grade: AGS 2.0 (H)
Clarity Grade: AGS 4 (VS2)
Carat Weight 2.070
Fluorescence: Negligible
Comments:"AGSL 104045793007 H&A" has been inscribed on the girdle of this diamond.
Additional clouds are not shown.

Light Performance: 0
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Table: 57.1%
Crown Angle: 34.8
Crown Height: 14.8%
Girdle: Faceted, 1.7% to 4.0%
Pavilion Angle: 40.9
Pavilion Depth: 43.3%
Star Length: 55%
Lower Girdle Length: 79%
Total Depth: 61.4%
Culet: Pointed

 

[proto]

Looks great as you would expect from any of WF IH collection.

To be super pedantic, this used to be an ACA in 2012, so suspect it may be a trade in.

http://vimeo.com/50775162

However this is listed on WF as an expert selection now, so I would ask them what happened to the diamond to change the classification.

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2400045.htm

 

[Myname1ssteve]

the IS and ASET i was furnished with doesnt show the same inclusion issues as the wf site perhaps they sent me pictures of a diff stone?

 

[proto]

give them a ring

 

[Myname1ssteve]

any idea what zoom that is in the video? im concerned with the crystals and what will be eye clean from say 6 inches.

 

[Myname1ssteve]

pics from wf different am i missing something?

 

[Myname1ssteve]

,

 

[Myname1ssteve]

you think those inclusions will be able to be seen in the video without a loupe