shape
carat
color
clarity

How is Eye-Clean Defined and How to Tell if a Diamond Online is Eye-Clean?

Texas Leaguer

Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
3,875
Eye-clean is an unscientific term but a very important criterion for most diamond shoppers. Most people understand that virtually all diamonds have some flaws (even Flawless diamonds if the magnification is high enough!), but they would rather not see them with the naked eye. And shoppers can save significant money by dropping several clarity grades and still get an eye-clean diamond. But where to draw the line? In this article we will be talking specifically about natural diamonds. Most of the lab grown diamonds on the market today are in the upper clarity grades and are almost all eye clean, although transparency remains an issue with some due to structural defects in the carbon lattice.
Natural diamonds have a wide range of possible inclusions. Among the most common are crystals, feathers, clouds, twinning wisps, and pinpoints (tiny crystals). Clarity grades are based mainly on the number and size of inclusions and how easy or difficult they are to see at 10x. The Si range and below have inclusions that are somewhat to very easy to see at 10x and may be visible to the unaided eye. VS and above are generally eye-clean, but there are exceptions which we will talk about below.

Hard to See Inclusion Types
Many shoppers prefer inclusion types such as Cloud and Twinning Wisp because they are hard to resolve with the naked eye. They are amorphous areas with very small features that can be hard to distinguish, even with magnification. They can often look prominent on a stone plot yet completely invisible to the naked eye. They serve to bring the clarity grade down, thereby saving money, while at the same time resulting in a completely eye-clean diamond. There is a limit to the benefit of this as we will discuss below. Since these inclusion types tend to scatter light, if they are too numerous or too dense they can cause an appreciable loss of overall transparency.
1732296325946.jpeg
Cloud inclusion – difficult to impossible to resolve with the naked eye

Crystals – aka “Carbon Spots” get a Bad Rap!
A crystal is a type of inclusion that is reflective or dark in color and can be easy to see with the naked eye if large enough and especially if located under the table. A crystal, or even a few crystals in a diamond, while capable of being seen with the naked eye, can often hide among the on/off and black/white scintillation of a diamond in motion. This is especially true if the crystal is located in the crown. And crystals do not scatter light the way some other inclusion types do. So, while many people do not want to see these so-called “carbon spots” with the naked eye, they might just make for a more beautiful diamond, and the camouflage given to them by the blinking of the facets can make them invisible to casual observation.

1732296421086.jpeg
Crystal inclusion - in this case located such that it reflects looking like two crystals

Eye-clean Definition
As mentioned, “eye-clean” is not a scientific term. Laboratory reports will not directly tell you whether a diamond is eye clean or not because there are two many variables; viewing distance, viewing angle, lighting, visual acuity of the observer, and even size and shape of the stone come into play. The type and size of inclusions and their locations will make a difference. That information can be gleaned to some extent from a laboratory report, so informed predictions can be made. If a diamond online is listed as eye-clean you need to understand what that merchant’s definition of eye-clean is and make sure it is in line with your expectations. Your visual acuity may be above average, especially if you are near-sighted and can focus at very close viewing distances. The best overall definition of eye-clean, and the one we use is:

No inclusions visible to the naked eye of a person with 20/20 vision when viewing the diamond in the face-up position at a distance of approximately 10 inches under normal overhead lighting.

Bear in mind that a diamond that is eye clean from the face up position may have a visible inclusion from the side. The shape and facet design of the diamond can also influence whether a stone is eye-clean or not. For example, emerald cut diamonds are famously unforgiving in that the large table and long step facets make seeing inclusions much easier than in brilliant styles. For this reason, most emerald cuts on the market tend to be in the higher clarity grades.
The size of the diamond also makes a difference as clarity grading is somewhat relativistic. That is, an inclusion of the size that would make a 3 ct diamond a VS2 would likely make a 1 ct diamond an Si1. Since the inclusion is the same in both stones, it is just as likely that the inclusion in the 3 ct is visible to the naked eye, even though the clarity grade is higher.

Not all Eye-Clean Diamonds are a Bargain
Some inclusions that may not be visible to the naked eye can sometimes be worse than inclusions that are visible. A diamond can have clarity features or defects in its crystal structure that reduce overall transparency. Inclusion types like twinning wisps, clouds and graining individually or in combination tend to prevent light from propagating fully through the diamond resulting in have negative impacts on transparency. A diamond with reduced transparency can look cloudy or hazy. In many cases the effect is very subtle; the diamond just doesn’t have as much “life” as it should. It is not uncommon for a diamond with an eye visible inclusion to be much more beautiful than a diamond that is eye clean but has light scattering inclusions or defects that reduce brilliancy and fire.
This is NOT to say that any diamond with a cloud, a twinning wisp, or graining has an appreciable transparency issue. Learning to read a laboratory report and pick up on the nuances of their indirect communication is very helpful. The Comments section is often used to give the consumer a heads-up on a transparency problem. For example, in the Si range a comment of “clarity grade based on clouds not shown” is an indication that the stone may have a transparency issue. Stones like this are often a little hazy or “sleepy” and lacking in brilliance. A stone with this problem will never have optimal light performance even with a precision cut.

Tolerance for Eye-visible Inclusions
Just because an inclusion may be technically visible to the naked eye does not make it an undesirable diamond. In fact, diamonds that are fully transparent and precision cut are often far more beautiful than other diamonds, even if they are not completely eye clean. In assessing eye-clean we are looking for inclusions and focusing solely on them. But a casual observer sees the diamond in a more holistic way, focusing on the brilliance and scintillation and other beauty factors such as shape and style of the setting. A small crystal that could be visible if you were trying to see it, is very often lost among the blinking facets of a brilliant diamond.

Conclusion
Eye clean is a term that means different things to different people. Make sure you understand the merchant’s definition of eye-clean and ensure that it matches your own. And understand not only your own visual acuity and ability to resolve inclusions, but your tolerance for being able to see an inclusion with the naked eye. It may not detract at all from the overall beauty of the diamond. In a real way, tolerance of a visible inclusion is just like tolerance of a little body color. Not everyone feels the need for a technically colorless diamond. But many do.

What is your tolerance for eye-visible inclusions? Is it a deal breaker if an inclusion can be seen with the naked eye?
 
Eye-clean is an unscientific term but a very important criterion for most diamond shoppers. Most people understand that virtually all diamonds have some flaws (even Flawless diamonds if the magnification is high enough!), but they would rather not see them with the naked eye. And shoppers can save significant money by dropping several clarity grades and still get an eye-clean diamond. But where to draw the line? In this article we will be talking specifically about natural diamonds. Most of the lab grown diamonds on the market today are in the upper clarity grades and are almost all eye clean, although transparency remains an issue with some due to structural defects in the carbon lattice.
Natural diamonds have a wide range of possible inclusions. Among the most common are crystals, feathers, clouds, twinning wisps, and pinpoints (tiny crystals). Clarity grades are based mainly on the number and size of inclusions and how easy or difficult they are to see at 10x. The Si range and below have inclusions that are somewhat to very easy to see at 10x and may be visible to the unaided eye. VS and above are generally eye-clean, but there are exceptions which we will talk about below.

Hard to See Inclusion Types
Many shoppers prefer inclusion types such as Cloud and Twinning Wisp because they are hard to resolve with the naked eye. They are amorphous areas with very small features that can be hard to distinguish, even with magnification. They can often look prominent on a stone plot yet completely invisible to the naked eye. They serve to bring the clarity grade down, thereby saving money, while at the same time resulting in a completely eye-clean diamond. There is a limit to the benefit of this as we will discuss below. Since these inclusion types tend to scatter light, if they are too numerous or too dense they can cause an appreciable loss of overall transparency.
1732296325946.jpeg
Cloud inclusion – difficult to impossible to resolve with the naked eye

Crystals – aka “Carbon Spots” get a Bad Rap!
A crystal is a type of inclusion that is reflective or dark in color and can be easy to see with the naked eye if large enough and especially if located under the table. A crystal, or even a few crystals in a diamond, while capable of being seen with the naked eye, can often hide among the on/off and black/white scintillation of a diamond in motion. This is especially true if the crystal is located in the crown. And crystals do not scatter light the way some other inclusion types do. So, while many people do not want to see these so-called “carbon spots” with the naked eye, they might just make for a more beautiful diamond, and the camouflage given to them by the blinking of the facets can make them invisible to casual observation.

1732296421086.jpeg
Crystal inclusion - in this case located such that it reflects looking like two crystals

Eye-clean Definition
As mentioned, “eye-clean” is not a scientific term. Laboratory reports will not directly tell you whether a diamond is eye clean or not because there are two many variables; viewing distance, viewing angle, lighting, visual acuity of the observer, and even size and shape of the stone come into play. The type and size of inclusions and their locations will make a difference. That information can be gleaned to some extent from a laboratory report, so informed predictions can be made. If a diamond online is listed as eye-clean you need to understand what that merchant’s definition of eye-clean is and make sure it is in line with your expectations. Your visual acuity may be above average, especially if you are near-sighted and can focus at very close viewing distances. The best overall definition of eye-clean, and the one we use is:

No inclusions visible to the naked eye of a person with 20/20 vision when viewing the diamond in the face-up position at a distance of approximately 10 inches under normal overhead lighting.

Bear in mind that a diamond that is eye clean from the face up position may have a visible inclusion from the side. The shape and facet design of the diamond can also influence whether a stone is eye-clean or not. For example, emerald cut diamonds are famously unforgiving in that the large table and long step facets make seeing inclusions much easier than in brilliant styles. For this reason, most emerald cuts on the market tend to be in the higher clarity grades.
The size of the diamond also makes a difference as clarity grading is somewhat relativistic. That is, an inclusion of the size that would make a 3 ct diamond a VS2 would likely make a 1 ct diamond an Si1. Since the inclusion is the same in both stones, it is just as likely that the inclusion in the 3 ct is visible to the naked eye, even though the clarity grade is higher.

Not all Eye-Clean Diamonds are a Bargain
Some inclusions that may not be visible to the naked eye can sometimes be worse than inclusions that are visible. A diamond can have clarity features or defects in its crystal structure that reduce overall transparency. Inclusion types like twinning wisps, clouds and graining individually or in combination tend to prevent light from propagating fully through the diamond resulting in have negative impacts on transparency. A diamond with reduced transparency can look cloudy or hazy. In many cases the effect is very subtle; the diamond just doesn’t have as much “life” as it should. It is not uncommon for a diamond with an eye visible inclusion to be much more beautiful than a diamond that is eye clean but has light scattering inclusions or defects that reduce brilliancy and fire.
This is NOT to say that any diamond with a cloud, a twinning wisp, or graining has an appreciable transparency issue. Learning to read a laboratory report and pick up on the nuances of their indirect communication is very helpful. The Comments section is often used to give the consumer a heads-up on a transparency problem. For example, in the Si range a comment of “clarity grade based on clouds not shown” is an indication that the stone may have a transparency issue. Stones like this are often a little hazy or “sleepy” and lacking in brilliance. A stone with this problem will never have optimal light performance even with a precision cut.

Tolerance for Eye-visible Inclusions
Just because an inclusion may be technically visible to the naked eye does not make it an undesirable diamond. In fact, diamonds that are fully transparent and precision cut are often far more beautiful than other diamonds, even if they are not completely eye clean. In assessing eye-clean we are looking for inclusions and focusing solely on them. But a casual observer sees the diamond in a more holistic way, focusing on the brilliance and scintillation and other beauty factors such as shape and style of the setting. A small crystal that could be visible if you were trying to see it, is very often lost among the blinking facets of a brilliant diamond.

Conclusion
Eye clean is a term that means different things to different people. Make sure you understand the merchant’s definition of eye-clean and ensure that it matches your own. And understand not only your own visual acuity and ability to resolve inclusions, but your tolerance for being able to see an inclusion with the naked eye. It may not detract at all from the overall beauty of the diamond. In a real way, tolerance of a visible inclusion is just like tolerance of a little body color. Not everyone feels the need for a technically colorless diamond. But many do.

What is your tolerance for eye-visible inclusions? Is it a deal breaker if an inclusion can be seen with the naked eye?

I want to see nothing in a diamond with the naked eye. I am buying in the VS1 - VS2 grades so I really don’t want to see a black inclusion in the table or a seemingly large cloud that can be problematic. It seems to me in looking at several diamonds as of late, that GIA is a bit more lenient on clarity than AGS. Might just be my observation but GIA has no competition in grading as they once did with AGS. Thoughts?
 
I think VS1 is a great target for a no-worry/eye-clean/no-transparency-issue purchase. You'll pay a premium over a carefully vetted VS2 or Si1, but it takes some of the work out of the search.
 
Great article Bryan!
One aspect which is often overlooked is the vision of the recipient.
There are stones whos imperfections I could see with the naked eye when I was 30 that are 100% eye clean to me now that I'm 155. OK maybe that's an exaggeration. I haven't cracked 100 yet, though it feels like it many days.
And my point stands that eye clean to one may not be eye clean to the other.
This has come into play many times when dealing with older clients who want a larger diamond- so buying an SI really saves a lot of money.
Oh- and believe it or not, we've had clients who requested a spot they could see!!
 
There are stones whos imperfections I could see with the naked eye when I was 30 that are 100% eye clean to me now that I'm 155. OK maybe that's an exaggeration. I haven't cracked 100 yet, though it feels like it many days.
Thanks David. I feel ya on the above. We're at the age where we have to start thinking about the kind of world we are going to leave to Keith Richards and Willie Nelson. :)
 
I avoid clouds, graining, and twinning wisps in colorless diamonds, but don’t mind them in colored diamonds. Transparency issues can sometimes enhance color.

I don’t like paying extra for something I cannot see, so I typically buy no higher than VS1 clarity. I would rather go down in clarity and pay less as long as it’s eye clean. Clear crystals, feathers, and needles that blend in with the faceting are my favorite inclusions.
 
A good friend upgraded her ring to a 2.4+ Canadian diamond. She told me it was special because it had a spot in the middle. Sure enough, there's a tiny brown crystal under the table, easily discernable without magnification. But it requires inspection to see it, and the diamond is spectacular. I see it flash across the room every time I see her.
 
When vendors make selections of diamonds they are going to stock, how do they determine which diamonds with what inclusions they will add to their inventory?
 
When vendors make selections of diamonds they are going to stock, how do they determine which diamonds with what inclusions they will add to their inventory?

That's a big question with no single answer. The vendor has to buy the quality their particular market demands, and sub-markets vary considerably. The buyer for a mall chain would be selecting much diffent goods than a pricescope merchant!

In addition most are always on the hunt for M&M's.... mistakes and metziahs (gifts). :)
 
That's a big question with no single answer. The vendor has to buy the quality their particular market demands, and sub-markets vary considerably. The buyer for a mall chain would be selecting much diffent goods than a pricescope merchant!

In addition most are always on the hunt for M&M's.... mistakes and metziahs (gifts). :)

An M&M being say a VS1 that really should have been a VS2 but GIA said VS1? So maybe you get a price break on the VS1 because it really should have been a VS2 so it is not trading as high as a VS1 should have? Just speculating here!
 
I hate to be Debbie downer here……
But the market has shifted dramatically from five years ago.
For one thing, retail sellers that actually purchase natural diamonds for stock are like chickens teeth today.
When prices were going up, purchasing was smart. Today there is a lot of “price insecurity”
Years ago I had a great business selling “Cape” diamonds to stores in St Thomas and St Maarten.
Drunken cruise passengers would gobble up K-L color diamonds. At the time a nice G//VS1 was probably $25k retail while a K-L was about $8k
Such stones were an easier sell than more imperfect stones with less color.
I think lab diamonds place in the market has completely upended such sort of sales. What we used to call “promotional quality”
Time will tell …..
 
I hate to be Debbie downer here……
But the market has shifted dramatically from five years ago.
For one thing, retail sellers that actually purchase natural diamonds for stock are like chickens teeth today.
When prices were going up, purchasing was smart. Today there is a lot of “price insecurity”
Years ago I had a great business selling “Cape” diamonds to stores in St Thomas and St Maarten.
Drunken cruise passengers would gobble up K-L color diamonds. At the time a nice G//VS1 was probably $25k retail while a K-L was about $8k
Such stones were an easier sell than more imperfect stones with less color.
I think lab diamonds place in the market has completely upended such sort of sales. What we used to call “promotional quality”
Time will tell …..

I get it - what the market will bear. Seems as though everyone has gone lab but with their falling prices, hard to imagine that there can be great profit in them. Must have to sell an inordinate amount of them (volume) to make up for past profit in naturals. If you are not stocking what folks in the natural market want, those sales lag too. A conundrum to be sure. However, it was the natural buyers that brought many to where they are today, and those buyers seem to be left out in the cold. People have long memories. . .
 
Two carat I1 with large inclusion under the table. In some lighting, it blends in.IMG_0637.jpegIMG_0636.jpeg
 
Two carat I1 with large inclusion under the table. In some lighting, it blends in.IMG_0637.jpegIMG_0636.jpeg

Looks pretty - as long as the inclusion doesn’t bother you, you are golden!
 
Is it a deal breaker if an inclusion can be seen with the naked eye?

It’s only a deal breaker, for me, if the vendor tells me it’s eye clean - but only in the specific showroom lighting they have, or something silly like that.

Knowing why something is priced the way it is, is key. Me making those parameter concessions is different than someone else/a salesperson deciding those concessions for me.
Whether I’m drunk on a cruise ship or not.
 
I’m also someone who wants a diamond completely eye clean (to my eye, which isn’t super picky tbh), but I also do agree very much that most people aren’t going to be inspecting your diamond very carefully at all, even if there is a somewhat visible inclusion it’s going to escape notice. I have a friend who has a GIANT ering (I can’t remember offhand now, but it was close to 7cts) and I remember her telling me it’s a SI1 when she originally got it. I spent a good few minutes looking it over and I could just barely pick out the inclusions even when she challenged me to, even after she told me the general areas where they were. And I had that thing close to my eyeball.

Actually if I think about it, I tend to notice clouds more than crystal inclusions, especially at lower clarity grades. I bought a diamond recently and was picking between two SI1 stones (both approx ~1.5ct), one with a crystal as the main inclusion and the other a cloud. Even though it wasn’t impacting transparency per se (since the cloud was confined to a spot on the crown) I couldn’t unsee that little hazy patch. I preferred the black spot on the other one even though it was closer to the table.
 
a gift to me from me!!!
 
This is such a an interesting thread! I am currently buying my first non eye clean ACA as a match for a 1.06 BGD stone to make a pair of 2ctw studs. (A Christmas Eve Eve gift to myself!)

I got the BGD J SI1 stone in a steal-of-a-deal ring from The Real Real. Then, I balked at the price of a diamond to exactly match it. More than twice the cost of the whole ring for just the stone! I mentally just couldn't do it.

But Whiteflash had a .994 J SI1 "inquire" about eye cleanliness ACA for about $2k less than an exact match. Just under the 1 ct mark, so a savings there. Not an exact match size wise, but really close. Could I live with the inclusion on the table, though?

For studs, yes. I can! I'm only going to see them in the box. Liza says the crystal inclusion blends in well with the arrow. And my vision is not great anyway. Lol

Interestingly, I never would have considered this non-eye clean diamond without the surge of lab diamonds. For me, the inclusion actually distinguishes it from a lab, and that makes me happy. I think things like that will appeal to more natural diamond buyers in the future.
 
An M&M being say a VS1 that really should have been a VS2 but GIA said VS1? So maybe you get a price break on the VS1 because it really should have been a VS2 so it is not trading as high as a VS1 should have? Just speculating here!

Borderline grades are a good example. But it often goes in the other direction. A VS2 that should have been a VS1. The buyer gets the price discount on what is essentially a better stone. This is particularly relevent on the Si1/VS2 borderline. Remember that 1 grade variance is generally accepted as inherent between top labs, and even within a lab. Therefore, there is potentially close to 2 grades difference between an Si1 that is borderline Si2 and one that is borderline VS2!

It an era gone by, where stones were not almost all laboratory graded, this gave really sharp dealers a BIG advantage. They could literally buy at Si1 price and get VS2 from the lab. Same with borderline colors. You could hit a homerun by getting upgrades in both color and clarity!

Some buyers also look for stones with reports, particularly in the Si range, that have very clean stone plots now that so many consumers are buying online. Shoppers need to use caution with those. Many look like proverbial "unicorns" on paper but have dreaded transparency issues!
 
I hate to be Debbie downer here……
But the market has shifted dramatically from five years ago.
For one thing, retail sellers that actually purchase natural diamonds for stock are like chickens teeth today.
When prices were going up, purchasing was smart. Today there is a lot of “price insecurity”
Years ago I had a great business selling “Cape” diamonds to stores in St Thomas and St Maarten.
Drunken cruise passengers would gobble up K-L color diamonds. At the time a nice G//VS1 was probably $25k retail while a K-L was about $8k
Such stones were an easier sell than more imperfect stones with less color.
I think lab diamonds place in the market has completely upended such sort of sales. What we used to call “promotional quality”
Time will tell …..

Indeed David, "time will tell." There's a new normal coming, but it is not this new normal! And it almost certainly won't look like the normal of the past.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top