- Joined
- Aug 29, 2003
- Messages
- 15,808
Date: 3/27/2005 9:51:47 AM
Author: mymulan
Would you (just personal here) pay 5k more for a smaller, less yellow stone?
NO
Unless you want to wear this pegged table down on white paper.
Today, the jeweler with the 2.66 stone will have to send the stone back unless I ask him to send it to EGL. I feel like I will be saying goodbye to the hamburger that looks like filet mignon.
I am a vegetarian... so the analogy is rather abstract fo me
Given that prices are made based on certified grades, I would definitely send this one to EGL (even for $400) if I knew I can't tell the grades... Since you say a bit of difference over white paper without much eye strain, I would say chances are the difference is of two color grades rather than one.
The offer to submit their stones to grading sounds curteous... hopefully this is no bluf (it could be). IMO, if you make the purchase conditional on EGL agreeing with the jeweler's estimate within two grades (added up: either one color and one clarity, or .... you know what I mean) there isn't much risk left on this purchase.
It would have been nicer of them to certify the stone at their expense and give you free choice of deciding after the grades come back. Any chance you could obtain this kind of agreement ? It is probably just a matter of persuading the seller that you are commited to the purchase (i.e. there aren't ten more diamonds pending somewhere so that you might as well buy from somewhere else ehile his stone is on vacation at EGL).
GIA sounds better, but takes longer - I think. Actually, how long does it take to obtain a "Dossier" report from GIA ? That should move faster. You might want to ask...
Just IMO. Please add salt.