- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
- Messages
- 33,976
Harriet, my bad....i hope i didn''t offend you. i was just trying to adding levity. good luck in your search for your pet rock.Date: 12/30/2006 1:29:19 AM
Author: Harriet
I''ve corrected it. Mea culpa.Date: 12/29/2006 9:51:53 PM
Author: marvel
is this one of those industry terms i''ve never heard of before?Date: 12/28/2006 4:45:41 PM
Author: Harriet
He said he looked a tit in all kinds of light, and just couldn''t give it even a J.
No offence taken. It is a funny error.Date: 12/30/2006 3:14:50 AM
Author: marvel
Harriet, my bad....i hope i didn''t offend you. i was just trying to adding levity. good luck in your search for your pet rock.Date: 12/30/2006 1:29:19 AM
Author: Harriet
I''ve corrected it. Mea culpa.Date: 12/29/2006 9:51:53 PM
Author: marvel
is this one of those industry terms i''ve never heard of before?Date: 12/28/2006 4:45:41 PM
Author: Harriet
He said he looked a tit in all kinds of light, and just couldn''t give it even a J.
Given the help I''ve received from some of you, I''d be delighted to show you my final ring.Date: 12/30/2006 10:02:55 AM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Harriet, as you can see, some of us didn''t have anything to do last night, and your thread turned into a chat thread!
But I just wanted to say that we have gained by learning through your experience, and I really hope you will allow us to see the diamond you finally choose. Three carat stones are not exactly common even here, so we do sincerely enjoy seeing them when they come along. And pictures of the finished ring are even better!
Date: 12/30/2006 1:30:26 PM
Author: Harriet
Has anyone here bought a J or below Whiteflash ''A Cut Above''?
LOL SKR you can definitely see 'a picture' here...how about 50000 of them??Date: 12/30/2006 1:47:30 PM
Author: SKR
Has anyone got a picture of Mara's 2ct J stone ? I have heard nothing but positives about it and would really like to see it.
Here''s a few.Date: 12/30/2006 1:47:30 PM
Author: SKR
Has anyone got a picture of Mara''s 2ct J stone ? I have heard nothing but positives about it and would really like to see it.
I''m beginning to think that way myself. My e-ring is an F, but when I upgrade it will probably be a J. My wedding band has .31 I stones...and it would have been fine with K''s even.Date: 12/30/2006 2:30:11 PM
Author: SKR
Thanks for the link ladies. That really is a stunning looking diamond - the more I look at such pics the more I think I / J colour is the way to go in a well cut round. The money saved should be put towards more carat weight
Bite your tongue, fella.Date: 12/30/2006 3:26:33 PM
Author: SKR
Thats so very true. I like to see a pretty face as much as any other man, but I am embarrased to say that lately I have been taking a keener interest in fingers. No it''s not a fetish but just me trying to see what women are wearing. I have attended more than my fair share of dinner parties etc and in my experience when/if the talk turns to a new piece of jewellery, I have never heard anyone say -
1. ''OH MY GOD, that stone is so eye clean''
2. ''That stone is so white it must be in the colorless band''.
3. ''AGS0?''
4. etc etc
What does come up time and time again are three simple comments (or something similar) -
1. ''Wow that stone is huge''
2. ''That setting is so elegant''
3. ''That stone shines so much''
So I am thinking about buying a near colourless (I/J), well cut (bling), honker of a round stone and topping it with a corker of a setting. If that doesnt work, I have been hanging out with the wrong crowd
I'll also be doing well when I find the money !! Well cut rounds cost a ton of notes.Date: 12/30/2006 3:38:26 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
You'll be doin' good, SKR!
Harriet - i have limited interest in buying the stone in question. Not because there is anything wrong with it but simply because once I can afford it, I will probably want to go slightly bigger.Date: 12/30/2006 4:50:48 PM
Author: Harriet
I''m curious -- Who would buy the infamous stone at issue (assuming the budget permits it)?
Can you find something bigger that's as well-cut? (I'm not sure my stone should be any larger -- my fingers are a short 5.5 in size, and I have to buy kids' gloves.)Date: 12/30/2006 4:59:26 PM
Author: SKR
Harriet - i have limited interest in buying the stone in question. Not because there is anything wrong with it but simply because once I can afford it, I will probably want to go slightly bigger.Date: 12/30/2006 4:50:48 PM
Author: Harriet
I'm curious -- Who would buy the infamous stone at issue (assuming the budget permits it)?
Are you still mulling it over and have you been speaking to WF ?
the real question is do you love it?Date: 12/30/2006 4:50:48 PM
Author: Harriet
I'm curious -- Who would buy the infamous stone at issue (assuming the budget permits it)?
i don''t have it with me. It''s gone from appraiser to appraiser.Date: 12/30/2006 5:03:38 PM
Author: strmrdr
the real question is do you love it?Date: 12/30/2006 4:50:48 PM
Author: Harriet
I''m curious -- Who would buy the infamous stone at issue (assuming the budget permits it)?
if I did I would keep it if not return it.