ScottGBP
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
- Messages
- 31
Well, it's not actually my wife that fluoresces blue in discos (though that would be kinda neat ) but the loose round brilliant I just bought her for our 20th anniversary e-ring upgrade. I just love looking at it under UV light - the interesting shade of blue really appeals to me. The pictures don't do it justice, but here's one anyway. This was taken with the UV light aimed at the side of the stone which seems to make it look a bit hazy - but with the UV light hitting it face-on it is perfectly clear, I just don't have a pic of that angle. In direct sunlight I do not notice any bluish hue in the stone.
As an added bonus, it also has phosphorescence (again, my wife doesn't)! I won't try to show a pic of that since it is just an orangish glow for quite a while after the UV is turned off.
Anyway, when researching diamonds my wife and I embraced the fluorescence aspect (it is strong blue on the GIA report) since we thought it: 1) would be "neat"; 2) could also potentially make a lower colored stone face up much whiter (and I think it does for this stone's "I" color, which appears very white to my noob eyes); and could help lower the cost. Reading all the SBF lovers' comments on this forum influenced us to consider it. And we are happy we did as we ended up with a great overall stone that we otherwise wouldn't have considered due to the SBF and the fear of the milkiness/oilyness/haziness that can rarely accompany these stones (I confirmed no SBF problems before purchasing).
Thought I'd capture my experiences on this and these comments in a thread for future forum searchers. We are very pleased with going for SBF! Scott
As an added bonus, it also has phosphorescence (again, my wife doesn't)! I won't try to show a pic of that since it is just an orangish glow for quite a while after the UV is turned off.
Anyway, when researching diamonds my wife and I embraced the fluorescence aspect (it is strong blue on the GIA report) since we thought it: 1) would be "neat"; 2) could also potentially make a lower colored stone face up much whiter (and I think it does for this stone's "I" color, which appears very white to my noob eyes); and could help lower the cost. Reading all the SBF lovers' comments on this forum influenced us to consider it. And we are happy we did as we ended up with a great overall stone that we otherwise wouldn't have considered due to the SBF and the fear of the milkiness/oilyness/haziness that can rarely accompany these stones (I confirmed no SBF problems before purchasing).
Thought I'd capture my experiences on this and these comments in a thread for future forum searchers. We are very pleased with going for SBF! Scott