- Joined
- Jun 8, 2008
- Messages
- 55,502
Problems with solutions that can only be a choice between bad and worse need to take into account many perspectives. If we put boots on the ground in Ukraine, shouldn't we also engage in war with all those countries committing genocide? Palestine and Israel have been killing each other for decades, which side should we choose there? What good would come from a war between China and Russia and the US and our allies?
These are heavy decisions being weighed among leaders of the free world who know more about the issues and potential ramifications than most ordinary citizens. I don't envy them the task ahead. They probably wish they could lead with their hearts and they understand why they cannot and they also know they will bear the consequences for their decisions. They are going to be criticized and demonized whatever the outcomes.
We won't rediscover our humanity among the rubble of nuclear waste.
Elie Weisel also said:
"There are times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest."
The free world is protesting; countries are skirting international law and agreements to aid Ukraine; the Swiss have revoked their neutrality, the first time since 1939, and are supplying weapons to Ukraine. These are not meaningless actions nor can they be portrayed as standing by and letting innocent people die.
We will see where this ends up. But I’m firmly on the side of doing more. It’s complicated sure. But every day more people are dying because we’re not doing more. I can’t rationalize that away. I’m not saying you are. I’m just sharing how I feel.
And we are not powerless. I’m confident if Elie Weisel were here he’d feel we could and should do more as well.