- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 12,676
@elizat Thank you for your response. I don’t like the flatter profile view. I’ve been looking at all the other upgrades people had with ACA or other super ideals, there are so much more rainbows in their pics. Mine just looks very white like it’s not a ‘dancing’ diamond. I see most rainbow colors on a cloudy day and when looking under direct sunlight, there are blinding pin fires but not flashes. I did notice it doesn’t go dark under any lighting just always so white. I just feel like it might get boring after a while... I don’t remember my 1.08 going dark in certain lighting or maybe just because I never really paid attention..
@munchee it was very big and white. I guess I was more fascinated with the size when I first got it. I definitely appreciate all the feedbacks from everyone but at that time I was already tied up with BN and this 60/60 was the best I could find at that time since another one I originally wanted was sold after I wanted to upgrade... it was a pretty horrible experience with BN and I just want to get it over with. I feel like I’m just so restricted with them especially once pass 30 days even if I don’t like this diamond I’ll be stuck with it. They don’t even give me a chance to just check it out. Only because I’ve read lots of comments from experts and all of you with experience, I want to work harder on my way to a super ideal. This new diamond just came out two days ago and I spotted it immediately, that’s why I’m only contemplating about exchange so close to my 30 days exchange period.
Ok. so I didn't know you didn't even LIKE your existing diamond. So like @Yimmers said, why are you settling? The worst that can happen is you don't like the new one either. You didn't like the old one. You're not any worse off. At least you have the chance of liking the new one MORE. And you do know that you like that "type" of cut cause your old 1 ct stone was more fiery and colorful. That's at least the type of stone the other one you are considering is.
If it were me, I would be sending this one off, knowing that I already don't like it. Now the obvious question is how would you handle this situation? And I wouldn't worry about a black inclusion under the table of a VS1. I've had a stone like that, black inclusion under the table for a VS1, GIA, and I couldn't see it with the naked eye. I had to look pretty hard for it under a loupe. And it's stupid for them to say a "feather" make it less valuable. If you compare any non-internally flawless stone to any internally flawless stone, any inclusion or imperfection will make a stone less valuable. That's like saying inclusions in a VS1 make it less valuable than a VVS1. DUH... That's why I'm not PAYING for a VVS1. It's cheaper genius. (I don't mean you. I mean the BN rep.)