stonehunter20
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2020
- Messages
- 418
Your opinion is the only opinion that counts and you need to be totally satisfied with your purchase.
If you think the eternity band is too thin or if you're concerned about durability issues, return it and explore other options.
I think that's the right decision! It's a beautiful band but I would go with something larger, perhaps matching the width and height of your beautiful ering.
I agree with those who said it would look better if it were the same height and a little thicker. However, I love the look of @Petalouda's set... I do a similar version with mixed metals
Setting (knife edge) and plain metal band (tri-wire) in platinum and diamond stacker is plated with black rhodium. They are also very close in height, so it works.
@ClassicSAC please come back and share with us what you choose!
Gorgeous diamond! I like the width of the smaller ring but the height off the finger of the wider ring matches the e-ring perfectly. The 2.5mm channel might be a perfect compromise!
The Chanel will be nice and smooth, I would vote for that one over the soleste! I do like the 2mm band as well! Fun !!!
I think that's the right decision! It's a beautiful band but I would go with something larger, perhaps matching the width and height of your beautiful ering.
Exactly this. The same width and height. I may be hyper sensitive to this. My eye immediately notices this particular lack of symmetry. And nothing works for me unless the height and width are the same. I've sent my ering back to the vendor that made it so he could make a band in the exact same width and height. Anal, I know. (Not the one in my avatar. The width and height of the shoulders on my ering are hard to match, as the shank is another height and width. It STILL bugs me and I've had this for 2 years now. Ongoing internal struggle...) That's why you have to try them on yourself if you aren't going custom.
It is 3 mm wide and is full eternity. I had never seen one that I really liked either - until this one. The diamonds are more prominent due to the thinner edges of metal on the sides of the ring. I have had the Tiffany Etoile, the Tiffany Bezet and now this channel set band. Their work is so refined on their bands and I have loved them all. It may not be your jam either but it may be something to think about.
The width looks better and it flows more. I am personally not picky about different heights, but do heights of the bands appear more symmetrical this time?
I really like the Embrace with your ring! Is is full eternity and what width is it? Course you know that you might need a spacer with it so that the diamonds on the Embrace don't eat into your prongs.
I think it is a beautiful classic look - how much wider is the next size up? *Ducks*! LOL!
The width on the Embrace is 2.2 mm and yes it is a full eternity. My rings tend to spin so I wanted the full one. The next size up is a 3.0 mm. The total carat weight of mine is .85. FYI, to top it off, I purchased it half price from a vendor who only sells pre-loved T & Co. diamond jewelry. I have used him in the past and he is great to work with. He had the original receipt from late 2019 and the ring had never been worn. I have a larger eternity band, not from Tiffany's, that I can also wear when I want more bling. This smaller version is perfect for everyday wear.
Thanks everyone for assisting me with my selection!
What a fabulous buy! It really does look great with your ring - so glad you finally found the right one!!
Thanks! I wanted to love the channel set but the shared prong is my favorite!