Leila
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 608
Date: 11/18/2005 3:24:31 PM
Author: Rhino
Thank you kindly for the shot Leila. Great shot that accentuates the detail from the profile and confirms what I thought. That is not abnormal at all. Different manufacturers set diamonds in slightly different ways and examining that picture shows me your perfectly fine regarding the security and setting of the stone. Your happiness however is our #1 priority so if you''d prefer the tops pressed down more, eliminating that faint gap, have your fiance contact our staff and we''ll take care of you asap.
Kind regards,
Jonathan
I realize this. To be honest I''ve never taken the time to view many of the pix posted or have taken note that they took detailed profile shots like Leila has. As some have expressed here when they first saw the pictures it looks perfectly fine. And really it is. I realize when you''re used to looking at a certain style of setting anything else seems, well ... as you put it odd. For a long time (like during the 80''s) when yellow gold was "in" many people were accustomed to that look and when platinum came back many of the people who were so used to yellow gold felt the same way. We do biz with a number of setting manufacturers who request us to send the stone to them for setting so warranties are kept in tact and each of these companies have diamond setters who all have thier own individual taste when it comes to setting diamonds. Some bead the prongs. Some bring them to points. Some make the prongs slightly higher, some slightly lower. Over the course of 25 years I''ve seen quite a variety of setting styles. All beautiful.Date: 11/18/2005 5:06:48 PM
Author: Mara
Date: 11/18/2005 3:24:31 PM
Author: Rhino
Thank you kindly for the shot Leila. Great shot that accentuates the detail from the profile and confirms what I thought. That is not abnormal at all. Different manufacturers set diamonds in slightly different ways and examining that picture shows me your perfectly fine regarding the security and setting of the stone. Your happiness however is our #1 priority so if you''d prefer the tops pressed down more, eliminating that faint gap, have your fiance contact our staff and we''ll take care of you asap.
Kind regards,
Jonathan
Jonathan, how is that possible? That shot looks totally odd and I have never seen a diamond set like that in any of the rings I have seen in person nor here on PS in any of the tons of shots we see of people''s rings.
Good question. Answer: Not at all. As long as the stone does not move in the setting and as long as the space is not raised to the point where it can catch on materials she''s just fine. Now this is not to say that there aren''t mistakes in setting jobs. Christen and Marie catch companies from time to time, and even our own setters who work for us personally. They inspect each ring to make sure the stone is tight and secure and that it is aesthetcially GORGEOUS. At times we''ve had to ask clients to wait when we catch this but the end result is always worth the wait to make sure it is done correctly.It seems insecure and even maybe that a good hard knock on the girdle could cause the stone to move. Wouldn''t the prongs not pressing down mean that there isn''t enough pressure on the stone to hold it securely into the V of the prong mounts?
It is quite possible (and most likely probable) that the same exact diamond setter who set her original stone (some time ago) is not the same identical diamond setter who set this one. To my knowledge Precision Set has many setters working for them. In the time that we have been dealing with this company we''ve never had a complaint regarding their craftsmanship and never has a person reported a diamond falling out of a ring that they set. At least with us anyhow.Also, if Leila''s ring was not set like this before, WHY would it be set like this now?
Healthy skepticism is a good thing Mara and you raise good questions. I appreciate the dialogue. While I do enjoy looking at pictures I have to tell ya ... I have so much work to do I really don''t have the time to come here and enjoy all the beautiful pictures that people post. I have never taken note of the various setting styles, with regards to the prongs that people post so I really don''t know the answer to your question. Perhaps the way yours was set is a little more popular? Both ways are fine really and no cause for alarm whatsoever.Not to be a total skeptic, but seriously it sounds REALLY odd that a setting like that would be ''normal''. Why have we never seen that on PS before as well?
I realize I was referring to you as Kayla in prior posts but isn''t that your daughter''s name? Sorry! You gave me a great idea. I am going to bring that picture to the jewelers and see if he can recreate those prongs for me. I loved it that way.Date: 11/18/2005 10:51:35 PM
Author: butterfly 17
Hi Leila, still loving your ring, despite the prong problems.
I hope you don''t mind, but when you first got that setting, I had downloaded it into my computer (I told you I love your ring) and I am posting it to show the difference between the way your new diamond is set and the way the old diamond was set.
I think you can see in this picture of the old diamond that the prongs are lower than the table and touching the top of the diamond.
Date: 11/18/2005 11:24:43 PM
Author: Leila
Oh, and next time please don''t post any of my pictures without my permission first. Just kidding! I couldn''t resist! Ok, ok, I know I am being bad.I am flattered you downloaded it!
I agree...what a drag but at least you know it will come back the way you want it! Just make sure GOG is clear on what you want changed...can't wait to see it when it's back!!Date: 11/23/2005 10:42:59 AM
Author: Demelza
So sorry to hear that, Leila. I can imagine it must be really hard to send it back having just gotten it. But it does make sense to have GOG fix the mistake and then it will be good as new!