I couldn''t have said it better myself! Congrats on getting a suitable resolutionDate: 9/27/2006 2:56:43 PM
Author: Mara
yay good for you gutman for sticking with what you wanted. i would have taken the $1300 deal if necessary, but it''s good that the store finally stepped up and recognized that they were at fault here for making the mistake and then trying to be all shifty about it. sometimes in business you have to take a hit when it''s your mistake. i do it in my job from time to time and yes it affects my bottom line in $$ but it makes me pay more attention next time. and awesome that your fiance gets to keep her ring!!!! and that you guys got a laugh out of it...because truly something like this should not mar the engagement experience. it''s about way more than some drama about the ring. and i''m sure she''s jazzed you went to bat for her and her ring because she loves it. kudos and congrats. NOW can we get some PICTURES here????
You know what I suspect happened here? I think that, contrary to what he told you, the manager did not tell the owner at first. I have a feeling he may have kept this under wraps rather than own up to what had happened on his watch (two-fold: the wrong diamond being set, and his sales associate going directly back to the customer first). The reason being that their initial approach was very short-sighted and not at all consistent with "owner-logic" (protect my store''s reputation) rather than "employee-logic" (CYA). But, finally, he goes to the owner, who probably told him straight out, "Give them the diamond and apologize your butt off."Date: 9/27/2006 1:30:24 PM
Author: gutman925
A (final?) update
I spoke with the store manager this morning. And the jewelery store has agreed to let my fiance keep her ring with the more-valuable stone at no additional cost. They made this offer, and I am (obviously) very satisfied with it.
YAY! Awesome. Glad to hear that you and the jeweler reached a mutually agreeable outcome.Date: 9/27/2006 1:30:24 PM
Author: gutman925
A (final?) update
I spoke with the store manager this morning. And the jewelery store has agreed to let my fiance keep her ring with the more-valuable stone at no additional cost. They made this offer, and I am (obviously) very satisfied with it.
I know there has been much debate over moral and ethical ideals. To me, this was a business negotiation. While feelings and emotions were defintily involved on my side, I did my best to leave them out when dealing with the store. There was negotiation, offers and counter offers, just like any other negotiation. In the end, they owned up to thier mistake and honored their relationship with the customer.
While i will not discolose the name of the jeweler on this board, I will reccomend them to friends and colleagues, and will likely be a repete customer.
HI:Date: 9/27/2006 5:03:02 PM
Author: CaptAubrey
All''s well that ends well.
We are on the same page. The keystone cop episodal made no sense to me from an owner point of view.Date: 9/27/2006 5:03:02 PM
Author: CaptAubrey
You know what I suspect happened here? I think that, contrary to what he told you, the manager did not tell the owner at first. I have a feeling he may have kept this under wraps rather than own up to what had happened on his watch (two-fold: the wrong diamond being set, and his sales associate going directly back to the customer first). The reason being that their initial approach was very short-sighted and not at all consistent with ''owner-logic'' (protect my store''s reputation) rather than ''employee-logic'' (CYA). But, finally, he goes to the owner, who probably told him straight out, ''Give them the diamond and apologize your butt off.''Date: 9/27/2006 1:30:24 PM
Author: gutman925
A (final?) update
I spoke with the store manager this morning. And the jewelery store has agreed to let my fiance keep her ring with the more-valuable stone at no additional cost. They made this offer, and I am (obviously) very satisfied with it.
All''s well that ends well.