Imdanny
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2008
- Messages
- 6,186
blackberry16 said:Last, but not least.... man jewelry. A watch and his ring is all DH is permitted to have.
klewis said:And we could extend the 'peeve' to races, religions, nations - why stop with the sexes?
Imdanny said:klewis said:And we could extend the 'peeve' to races, religions, nations - why stop with the sexes?
Oh how right you are.
LaurenThePartier said:As for too tight rings, I feel like my rings may look too tight, but I can wear rings 2 sizes too large and my finger still poofs up around it. I can easily get all of my rings off without licking my finger (Gah, who does that anyway ), but sometimes I see someone else with the finger muffin top and I can relate. May or may not be anything they can do about that.
LaurenThePartier said:As for too tight rings, I feel like my rings may look too tight, but I can wear rings 2 sizes too large and my finger still poofs up around it. I can easily get all of my rings off without licking my finger (Gah, who does that anyway ), but sometimes I see someone else with the finger muffin top and I can relate. May or may not be anything they can do about that.
MC...does that mean you don't like my toering?...MC said:Mine include:
* Men who wear any jewelry besides wedding band. I think men and rings, necklaces, etc: tacky* Multiple items. Too much jewelry.
* My other, and this is sort of related, is when people spend tons of money (like $15K or more) on jewelry and spell everything wrong in their posts. HOW does one manage to make that much $ and not have the skills to proofread? My spelling/grammer isn't too good, but I don't spend large amounts on jewelry that would be common with a high-paying job, so my posts don't count! hahaha When I post about my 10K ring I am looking to get, THEN you guys can remind me of this post lol
reader said:New pet peeve: using carrot in ads, and then not knowing the weight of the stone you are trying to sell.
Clio said:LaurenThePartier said:As for too tight rings, I feel like my rings may look too tight, but I can wear rings 2 sizes too large and my finger still poofs up around it. I can easily get all of my rings off without licking my finger (Gah, who does that anyway ), but sometimes I see someone else with the finger muffin top and I can relate. May or may not be anything they can do about that.
Ditto. It's just the way my finger is shaped. My rings always look too tight unless they're sized so big that they fall off.
Circe said:Imdanny said:klewis said:And we could extend the 'peeve' to races, religions, nations - why stop with the sexes?
Oh how right you are.
Ditto, KLewis & Imdanny.
Really, guys?
Rae~ said:I am also a little disturbed to see the "men shouldn't wear any jewellery" comments.... I know this is a thread for venting on stuff that peeves us, but really? That seems a little more extreme than the "I don't like dirty jewellery" or "Tight rings make me cringe" comments. I could understand saying that you dislike a LOT of jewellery on men, but dictating what your DH is and isn't "permitted" to wear? Yikes, that leaves a sour taste in my mouth. Perhaps your DH is happy to bend to your rules, or perhaps you just got lucky and found someone whose preference matched your own... who knows.
P.S. - I can see the contradiction in my saying that one aesthetic - ie men with some jewellery - is not open to criticism, but yet other aesthetics - eg multiple non-stacker rings on one finger - can be criticised. I guess it's the "gender-specificness" of the first criteria that riles me.
Iamdanny - wear whatever the hell you want.
I'd like to think that those posters were just clumsy in their turn of phrase.
Siamese Kitty said:Methinks some of us are taking this thread too seriously. And if we want to get down to the nitty gritty, none of these "peeves" would be considered a compliment to the offender.
Rae~ said:Iamdanny - wear whatever the hell you want.
MC said:Rae~ said:I am also a little disturbed to see the "men shouldn't wear any jewellery" comments.... I know this is a thread for venting on stuff that peeves us, but really? That seems a little more extreme than the "I don't like dirty jewellery" or "Tight rings make me cringe" comments. I could understand saying that you dislike a LOT of jewellery on men, but dictating what your DH is and isn't "permitted" to wear? Yikes, that leaves a sour taste in my mouth. Perhaps your DH is happy to bend to your rules, or perhaps you just got lucky and found someone whose preference matched your own... who knows.
P.S. - I can see the contradiction in my saying that one aesthetic - ie men with some jewellery - is not open to criticism, but yet other aesthetics - eg multiple non-stacker rings on one finger - can be criticised. I guess it's the "gender-specificness" of the first criteria that riles me.
Iamdanny - wear whatever the hell you want.
I'd like to think that those posters were just clumsy in their turn of phrase.
Well so it's not okay for me to say what I did, but others can complain about people having "sausage" fingers without critisism? Doesn't that extend into the realm of commenting on a persons chubby hands? Seems that's rude.
I guess talking crap about friends and co-workers and friends is okay???
Clio said:LaurenThePartier said:As for too tight rings, I feel like my rings may look too tight, but I can wear rings 2 sizes too large and my finger still poofs up around it. I can easily get all of my rings off without licking my finger (Gah, who does that anyway ), but sometimes I see someone else with the finger muffin top and I can relate. May or may not be anything they can do about that.
Ditto. It's just the way my finger is shaped. My rings always look too tight unless they're sized so big that they fall off.
MC said:Rae~ said:I am also a little disturbed to see the "men shouldn't wear any jewellery" comments.... I know this is a thread for venting on stuff that peeves us, but really? That seems a little more extreme than the "I don't like dirty jewellery" or "Tight rings make me cringe" comments. I could understand saying that you dislike a LOT of jewellery on men, but dictating what your DH is and isn't "permitted" to wear? Yikes, that leaves a sour taste in my mouth. Perhaps your DH is happy to bend to your rules, or perhaps you just got lucky and found someone whose preference matched your own... who knows.
P.S. - I can see the contradiction in my saying that one aesthetic - ie men with some jewellery - is not open to criticism, but yet other aesthetics - eg multiple non-stacker rings on one finger - can be criticised. I guess it's the "gender-specificness" of the first criteria that riles me.
Iamdanny - wear whatever the hell you want.
I'd like to think that those posters were just clumsy in their turn of phrase.
Well so it's not okay for me to say what I did, but others can complain about people having "sausage" fingers without critisism? Doesn't that extend into the realm of commenting on a persons chubby hands? Seems that's rude.
I guess talking crap about friends and co-workers and friends is okay???
reader said:New pet peeve: using carrot in ads, and then not knowing the weight of the stone you are trying to sell.
Matata said:reader said:New pet peeve: using carrot in ads, and then not knowing the weight of the stone you are trying to sell.
It's vegetable abuse and should not be tolerated.
Amber St. Clare said:Matata said:reader said:New pet peeve: using carrot in ads, and then not knowing the weight of the stone you are trying to sell.
It's vegetable abuse and should not be tolerated.