reader
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 1,195
Steal said:MC said:Rae~ said:I am also a little disturbed to see the "men shouldn't wear any jewellery" comments.... I know this is a thread for venting on stuff that peeves us, but really? That seems a little more extreme than the "I don't like dirty jewellery" or "Tight rings make me cringe" comments. I could understand saying that you dislike a LOT of jewellery on men, but dictating what your DH is and isn't "permitted" to wear? Yikes, that leaves a sour taste in my mouth. Perhaps your DH is happy to bend to your rules, or perhaps you just got lucky and found someone whose preference matched your own... who knows.
P.S. - I can see the contradiction in my saying that one aesthetic - ie men with some jewellery - is not open to criticism, but yet other aesthetics - eg multiple non-stacker rings on one finger - can be criticised. I guess it's the "gender-specificness" of the first criteria that riles me.
Iamdanny - wear whatever the hell you want.
I'd like to think that those posters were just clumsy in their turn of phrase.
Well so it's not okay for me to say what I did, but others can complain about people having "sausage" fingers without critisism? Doesn't that extend into the realm of commenting on a persons chubby hands? Seems that's rude.
I guess talking crap about friends and co-workers and friends is okay???
Talk about a storm in a tea-cup. How did a little pet-peeve turn into all of this? Surely MC/MB are entitled to post what she posts? I don't see anything sexist, racist or any other kind of -ist there. It makes me sad to see a posters view whipped in the blink of an eye into something far greater than what was written. Wouldn't it be nicer not to attack another point of view, just because it could be read in a certain light - if you squint really hard?
And as for men with jewellery, it isn't really done here so I can't comment other than to say I would find it unusual to see a man with earrings and chains...but I would love to get a wb with a cute little asscher for DH some day
reader said:I remember going to Mt. Vernon and seeing Martha Washington's "keeper ring" a band of diamonds meant to 'protect the more precious wedding band' by being worn on the outside of the wedding ring. Perhaps this, and Queen Charlotte's 1761 keeper band, is the reason behind the view that the engagement ring should be worn on top of the wedding band.
sirbenson said:This is a question for those that have the pet peeve about people wearing their wedding band "outside" of their e-ring i.e. e-ring is closer to the web, w-band closer to the knuckle....why does it peeve you? I am not married yet and wondered wear to put the w-band. Why does it matter wear it goes? I've read that someone says the w-band should be "closer to the heart". Why? I guess I don't understand. But then again Im not the sentimental type, nor, supersticious, nor do I believe in things like "something old, something new...". I plan to have a plain band and also a eternity band, which will flank my e-ring. So is it bad to have one band on either side? To me it look smore balanced vs. having them both on the inside. I'd rather keep the sparkly one closer to me so that IF one fell off it would only be the plain band (the one I'll get married with).
Sizzle said:sirbenson said:This is a question for those that have the pet peeve about people wearing their wedding band "outside" of their e-ring i.e. e-ring is closer to the web, w-band closer to the knuckle....why does it peeve you? I am not married yet and wondered wear to put the w-band. Why does it matter wear it goes? I've read that someone says the w-band should be "closer to the heart". Why? I guess I don't understand. But then again Im not the sentimental type, nor, supersticious, nor do I believe in things like "something old, something new...". I plan to have a plain band and also a eternity band, which will flank my e-ring. So is it bad to have one band on either side? To me it look smore balanced vs. having them both on the inside. I'd rather keep the sparkly one closer to me so that IF one fell off it would only be the plain band (the one I'll get married with).
I just don't like it. It bothers my eye.. No real reason.
Dreamer_D|1288292896|2749447 said:Ugly prong work
Dirty diamonds
Circe|1287855006|2745106 said:sphenequeen said:someone licking their ring(s) to take them off.
Okay, EW.
Megalomi|1294871944|2821054 said:9. chokers - the tight necklace...no. stop it, please.
Trekkie|1287851719|2745066 said:Sparkly Blonde said:The only person who really pissed me off with her jewelery was a coworker at my last job. She bought a "princess" (really ugly cut) cz set in silver from avon because her first diamond was tiny. She'd then slather lotion all over her hands, and the set, and shove her hands in front of people and say, "don't you just loooovveeee my diamonds?"
Ew. That's disgusting! I'd be so tempted to 'out' her.
I hate looking at women who wear several rings on each finger, especially when they're low carat yellow gold rings. I see it frequently in shop assistants here in SA. Why wear a dozen cheap 9ct yellow gold rings on one hand when you could rather save and buy one or two really good pieces?
I also get very frustrated when people assume my diamonds are fake simply because they're more used to seeing teensy diamond chips set in elaborate 9ct yellow gold settings flanked by 3 bands on each side. I'm not exaggerating - that's considered 'grand' by my coloured relatives: 5 or 7 bands of icky low carat yellow gold and the occasional diamond chip. I wish I could load a picture to show you.
that was me.. ..we can't afford to insure our jewelry.the insurance Co. quote was... $220 per $10k worth of jewelry...rubybeth|1294953691|2822003 said:Also, whoever said uninsured jewelry: ditto. My mom has a number of nice pieces (diamond studs, gemstone rings, diamond channel set band, etc.) and none of it is insured. I almost want to get it insured myself, since my sister cares not a whit for fine jewelry and I'll probably end up with all of it (in, like, 30 years). I've helped a handful of friends buy engagement rings, and I'd wager none of them are insured, either.
Lula|1295017259|2822645 said:The "Everlon" design and its variations. It looks like a jockstrap to me.
And can I include bad mall brand advertisements in this thread? This one sets my teeth on edge http://bitchmagazine.org/post/every-kiss-begins-with-fear