ksluice
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Messages
- 537
Date: 10/3/2009 7:33:56 PM
Author: princesss
Changed my mind. I''d have to bargain it down a little, but this is what I''d pick:
They did say they would bargain, too
Date: 10/3/2009 7:33:56 PM
Author: princesss
Changed my mind. I''d have to bargain it down a little, but this is what I''d pick:
I''d pick the ring!!!! I just can''t see spending $35,000 on something that lasts a few hours!Date: 10/1/2009 12:02:25 AM
Author: Dancing Fire
DSDate: 9/30/2009 11:16:53 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
Okay, I am not a LIW, but I''d want half for the ring and half for the wedding!
don''t give us the easy answersooo...which one would you pick?
Date: 10/4/2009 12:45:15 AM
Author: PilsnPinkysMom
Ring. All. The. Way.
Which makes me wonder- WHY are we paying out of pocket for a too-close-to-35k-for-comfort wedding?! WHY do we want to wine and dine so many people?! ...If only I could go back one year and re-start this wedding-planning process....
(Well, if I had a 35k ring it means I''d need to get FI a 35k *something*... a lifetime of season tickets for the Broncos?)
Just wanted to update and say that my first wedding, 10 years ago, cost my parents $30K for 150 guests. I didn''t want a big wedding then, but it''s a cultural thing for them, a point of pride, so I just told them to plan what they wanted - I didn''t care enough to put the kibbosh on it. My parents friends talked and raved about the wedding for months, but I was exhausted and can barely remember things, there was so much going on.Date: 10/1/2009 7:30:39 AM
Author: vespergirl
Definitely the ring. I didn''t care about having a big wedding - we had a small (12 people) destination wedding on a cliff overlooking the ocean in Bermuda. DH bought me an expensive ring, and I splurged on my dress, but I had no interest in buying hundreds of people dinner.