Gemklctr
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2005
- Messages
- 451
Thanks Dee Jay. I don''t have papers on the stone, but I think it is just a well cut "oval brilliant" as GIA would label it. It has minimal bowtie and from some angles that "crushed ice" look you see in some well cut radiants. But I will get it out of the safe and check it again to confirm.Date: 5/2/2006 2:45:31 PM
Author: Dee*Jay
If I come back to these photos one more time I might as well just make them my screen saver -- what a GEORGOUS stone!
Do you by any chance know what the faceting pattern is called? I''ve seen various ways that oval stones are cut but this is by far the most stunning.
No problem. I''m pulling it out anyway to embark on a setting project. I need to post photos of the options so the crew here can chime in. Besides, you now have me wondering if there is something unique there that I missed. I bought it based on the overall appearance and, especially, the unique coloration for an irradiated stone.Date: 5/3/2006 12:15:12 PM
Author: Dee*Jay
GK - don''t go to any trouble, like getting it out of the safe. I just wondered if you knew. I''m on the hunt for a new oval myself (but a regular white diamond) and your stone has become the model of what kind of cut I''m looking for!
I''m sure glad you still have that lovely yellow, GK. It was just breathtaking when I saw it.Date: 5/3/2006 12:29:18 PM
Author: GemKlctr
I''m partial to ovals and have another 3+ ct natural fancy yellow in my collection as well. Obviously, we''d all like to be involved in your search and see the results.
Date: 5/6/2006 4:02:03 PM
Author: GemKlctr
Dee Jay you may be right. I examined Big Blue, and it appears to have a modified pavillion/culet. Instead of all the pavillion facets meeting at a pointed culet, the facets coming from each of the end points of the oval meet about a millimeter on either side of the culet. The pavillion angle changes at that point, and ridges similar to those found on step cut stones flow into the culet from both ends. The effect when viewed from the long side with the stone face down is similar to the Acura car symbol, but with much wider inside angles.
Maybe some of the experts could chime in regarding how different, if at all, this is from typical oval cuts.
Me too DL. It was part of my collection, so I get to keep it.Date: 5/6/2006 8:06:54 PM
Author: DiamondLil
I''m sure glad you still have that lovely yellow, GK. It was just breathtaking when I saw it.Date: 5/3/2006 12:29:18 PM
Author: GemKlctr
I''m partial to ovals and have another 3+ ct natural fancy yellow in my collection as well. Obviously, we''d all like to be involved in your search and see the results.
Can''t wait to help with setting Big Blue.
The X/Y appearance may come from the ridge on the long axis, which is created by the end facets meeting to either side of instead of at the culet. When I start the thread on setting Big Blue, I''ll try to get a photo of the pavillion and we can ask the pros to comment. If there is a name, the experts here should know it. I think they are the best collection of expertise you''ll find in any forum, virtual or otherwise.Date: 5/6/2006 9:46:09 PM
Author: Dee*Jay
Date: 5/6/2006 4:02:03 PM
Author: GemKlctr
Dee Jay you may be right. I examined Big Blue, and it appears to have a modified pavillion/culet. Instead of all the pavillion facets meeting at a pointed culet, the facets coming from each of the end points of the oval meet about a millimeter on either side of the culet. The pavillion angle changes at that point, and ridges similar to those found on step cut stones flow into the culet from both ends. The effect when viewed from the long side with the stone face down is similar to the Acura car symbol, but with much wider inside angles.
Maybe some of the experts could chime in regarding how different, if at all, this is from typical oval cuts.
GK - When I look a the stone it almost looks like it''s cut with a definite X and Y axis, kind of like some princess cuts if you turn them 45 degrees. (Does that make ANY sense whatsoever???) I LOVE LOVE LOVE the cut of this stone. If there is a name for it I would love to know so I can concentrate on finding one with that same facet pattern.
ETA when I was in Tiffany''s last weekend buying a gift I just ''happened'' to stop by the counter with the engagement rings. I didn''t actually try the oval solitare that they had on (in my blue jeans and keds I probably didn''t make a very likely purchase candidate, LOL!), but it looked (from through the glass case) to be cut similar to your stone.
I would expect it''s only done when the anticipated result is an increase in value. Since treated stones don''t typically sell for as much as good quality untreated stones, this means that only poor quality stones (such as those with bad color or visible inclusions, which can be masked or at least reduced in prominence by the treatment) are irradiated. As a result, for example, most irradiated blues end up very dark. That''s what makes Big Blue such an unusual stone.Date: 5/7/2006 8:16:44 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
That stone is very beautiful!
I am just curious about something. What does irradiating a diamond do to it''s value?
Date: 10/18/2005 2:37:08 PM
Author:GemKlctr
Here is my 3.11ct irradiated blue diamond. It is 11.1x7.9x5.2mm and a VS clarity by my grading. It is a lighter colored and brighter stone than most treated diamonds. I''m not ready to set it yet, but eventually I will be seeking your advice. Several more photos to follow. Enjoy.
I saw your other post, and I think you are on the right track. Blue zircon is probably your best choice for color and brilliance. Good luck with your search.Date: 5/14/2006 6:13:33 PM
Author: lookingood35
Date: 10/18/2005 2:37:08 PM
Author:GemKlctr
Here is my 3.11ct irradiated blue diamond. It is 11.1x7.9x5.2mm and a VS clarity by my grading. It is a lighter colored and brighter stone than most treated diamonds. I''m not ready to set it yet, but eventually I will be seeking your advice. Several more photos to follow. Enjoy.
Can you tell me there is another gem that is close to this color?