lumpkin
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- May 24, 2005
- Messages
- 2,491
Without further ado... can I try your ring on?Date: 2/17/2008 6:35:08 AM
Author: Ellen
Actually, ado is correct in this context beau. Your spelling means to bid farewell.Date: 2/16/2008 11:22:58 PM
Author: beau13
So without further ''adieu''
Lovely ring.
And thanks.
Date: 2/17/2008 12:15:03 PM
Author: Maisie
Without further ado... can I try your ring on?Date: 2/17/2008 6:35:08 AM
Author: Ellen
Actually, ado is correct in this context beau. Your spelling means to bid farewell.Date: 2/16/2008 11:22:58 PM
Author: beau13
So without further 'adieu'
Lovely ring.
And thanks.
Date: 2/17/2008 12:18:36 PM
Author: Ellen
Date: 2/17/2008 12:15:03 PM
Author: Maisie
Without further ado... can I try your ring on?Date: 2/17/2008 6:35:08 AM
Author: Ellen
Actually, ado is correct in this context beau. Your spelling means to bid farewell.Date: 2/16/2008 11:22:58 PM
Author: beau13
So without further ''adieu''
Lovely ring.
And thanks.Anything for you lovely Miss Maise.
Angel, thanks!!
Date: 2/17/2008 12:58:54 PM
Author: Ellen
Eva, thank you!
2, lol. There are 10 diamonds that go all the way around. I didn''t ask what size the stones were, but they say approx. .33 ctw. So, whatever that comes out to. In other words, teeny.
No, not 3 pointers, not even a 1 pointer. Like 1/3rd of 1.Date: 2/17/2008 1:02:54 PM
Author: thing2of2
Thanky!
So...3 pointers, I guess? Them teeny diamonds go a long way-that band is just scrumptious!
Date: 2/17/2008 1:10:38 PM
Author: Ellen
No, not 3 pointers, not even a 1 pointer. Like 1/3rd of 1.Date: 2/17/2008 1:02:54 PM
Author: thing2of2
Thanky!
So...3 pointers, I guess? Them teeny diamonds go a long way-that band is just scrumptious!
Ok, now math was never my strong suit, and the way I did it on the calculator, it didn''t come up to that. But, in reality it makes sense, however, I have 2 pointers in my old ering set, and they''re (the WF stones) nowhere near that big...Date: 2/17/2008 1:15:21 PM
Author: mrssalvo
according to my math, they should be 3 pointers.... .03 x 10 = .30
Date: 2/17/2008 1:19:06 PM
Author: Ellen
Ok, now math was never my strong suit, and the way I did it on the calculator, it didn''t come up to that. But, in reality it makes sense, however, I have 2 pointers in my old ering set, and they''re (the WF stones) nowhere near that big...Date: 2/17/2008 1:15:21 PM
Author: mrssalvo
according to my math, they should be 3 pointers.... .03 x 10 = .30
Date: 2/17/2008 1:35:50 PM
Author: Ellen
They''re definitely 2 pointers, it was appraised a couple times. But, maybe they''re shallow, and spreadier? Oh well, I guess these are 3. But lemme tell ya, at a glance, I don''t even know that people will see them.
I think I will order a half size bigger.... thats if I get oneDate: 2/17/2008 12:36:28 PM
Author: Ellen
Ya know Maise, I honestly wasn''t sure what size to order. I''ve bought cheap rings, the ones that only come in like whole and half sizes, and always went with a 7 on those cuz I don''t like my rings tight. Then I had the Aqua ring that''s being redone sized, it was a 7, but didn''t fit loose. I''ve come to the conclusion that settings tend to be like shoes, clothing, etc. Some run true to size, some don''t. So, taking all that into account, plus the wider band, I ordered a 6.75, and it fits like a glove.
I don''t know how much help that was though...