beaujolais
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 2,220
ieatbugs
Two threads above this.


Back to the regularly scheduled programming . . .
ieatbugs
sonomacounty|1343338091|3240813 said:ieatbugs
Two threads above this.![]()
Cute user name, for sure.
Back to the regularly scheduled programming . . .
Stonebender|1343339321|3240829 said:LD, there's no question about this being an opal. I'm not convinced it's treated, but it's something I want to determine since precious opal with a transparent natural blue body color is quite uncommon. Uncommon enough that the difference in value between untreated and treated is rather large. You know... I just want to be sure it's not dyed or anything before I declare it something it might not be.
My pictures are no secret, lol. I use an Olympus SP-800UZ which can be a real pain in the butt with certain shots and lighting. I just use a neutral background, usually grey, and daylight-equivalent lighting. Nothing fancy at all... Simple editing like adjusting brightness and white balance to get the pictures to look on the monitor as close to how I see things with my own eyes.
It was a habit I had as a child that mortified my parents, but I decided to embrace as an adult.... ;D
ieatbugs|1343352412|3241019 said:It's hard to compare the opals that are cabochons to the faceted cut of the mystery stone, too.
Stonebender|1343354590|3241050 said:ieatbugs|1343352412|3241019 said:It's hard to compare the opals that are cabochons to the faceted cut of the mystery stone, too.
It's not that difficult. You just have to ignore the cut/shape and concentrate on the inherent qualities of the stones themselves.