- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 5,083
Ksinger, in all fairness I'm responding to several posts at once here, not all of which were made by you. The stripper comment is from Cuso's thread from before xmas.
I will try to return later to give a more detailed answer, but essentially the class/demographic generalizations regarding student potential really bother me. Of course I am aware of what the research shows. I just don't think it is constructive to perpetuate the findings. After talking with some of the students with whom I've worked, I have been horrified by some of the stories these kids have told me about their teachers. Stories I believed because I have seen it firsthand. This "harmless" statistical knowledge that anyone working in education has no doubt learned about in grad school trickles down to teacher attitudes in many cases. I can't help but wonder if one reason this evidence is so strong is because the kids are beat down at home, and then at school, too. Of course they are at a disadvantage. Sending a kid to the principal's office everyday because you don't like the way they dress or a principal kicking them out of the high school when they turn eighteen because they are a "nuisance" is very sad.
It's possible I'm not forming my argument well here-I've had a terrible cold for the past week that has put me in a FOG. I'm really enjoying everyone's different perspectives, though. It's really interesting to see what the other teachers think.
Ah, here's a question. How many of you live in districts where kids are permitted to go to their school of choice to facilitate desegregation? We're experiencing problems with this here, argument being lack of parent/community involvement because many of the students are from out of district.
A bit overdue, but I wanted to respond to this, even if briefly. First, for the record, I don't think every kid is a gang-banger, or every parent a crack addict. I know several people would like to attribute that to me by my one eye-rolling comment in response to the DUH type of observation that "kids do better in a safe and supportive environment". If I was commenting on anything it was the fact that too many kids have parents who don't provide that, nor do they provide the environment - ala my post of the excerpt from that report - that most of us here consider essential and taken for granted - like reading to their children, or in some cases, even talking to them. It does hamper their development AND potential, and not to SEE that is to continue not to be able to serve them properly, and to continue pointing accusing fingers at education when these kids don't move progress as fast as some think they should.
If people here have been honest in saying, "I'm sending my kid to private/better public, because that one is dangerous", then let's be honest and admit that dangerous schools DO exist, and it isn't because certain teachers can't leave their prejudices out of the classroom. The schools and the kids in them, are a reflection of the community in which they exist.
I don't see that attitude of disrespect you are talking about where we are as much as giving some kids TOO many chances. To the point of ridiculousness. I won't elaborate further, because I'm likely not supposed to know some of the stuff I do. Let's just say that bending over backwards to "help" these kids, can turn be turned into hindrance in the long-term.