- Joined
- Dec 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,491
Queenie, I can only speak for my part in this and say that I didn't bash Ruby, but I did respond that I find her posts of a certain nature and tone and do not read them as a result.
So, with all due respect, she has already demonstrated bullying behavior. My response in this thread is not to attack her but to express my opinion that this thread about Michelle was in extremely poor taste and had a racist tone. If these posts are to be tolerated as freedom of speech, then whoever the poster is needs to accept there will be a strong opinion as a result or not post to incite reaction.
As far as the Michelle college thread from the OP I have made my opinion known that I think it is a ridiculous thread and my opinion of the issue is on the first page. I did not read all of it because it is ridiculous. Ruby does start inflammatory posts on occasion and I guess so do I, though less frequently.
But since some have decided to expand on that thread to obviously include me in their posts on this thread regarding racism I have to respond. I will not try to change any of your minds about me because if any of you think I am a racist then that is your problem and definitely not mine. It is interesting that the members some of you are talking about are conservative. Conservatives have known for years that the way some liberals shut down a conversation is to charge racism. If racism to you is defined by someone talking about personal responsibility, enforcing immigration laws, disagreement with the tenets of BLM, welfare abuse, and heaven forbid affirmative action (which is too charged for even me to discuss here at any length) or any other issue of the day then you are conflating racism with opposing opinion. I do not feel my race is superior to ANY other and that is the definition of racism. So it seems you are really talking about perceived prejudice. You have no idea what is in someone else's heart and nor do I so I do not presume to know, however many of you do make that presumption. Or even go so far as to psychoanalyze the offending poster. The hubris in that is astounding. Then there are those who feel the need to show the offenders the error of their ways by "educating" them. Also astounding hubris.
If the members here want to ask Andrey to ban all posters who disagree with the pack mentality shown in this thread then by all means do it. Because that is not a place I would like to spend time anyway. I already ignore the nastiest here but peeked in this thread to ensure I followed the conversations being discussed.
I'm going to agree with Ilander. I've been avoiding PS a lot. I use the mark forums read every time I check in, mostly out of frustration. This used to be a great place to hangout. Now I'm supposed to just ignore racism, and other offensive posts, instead of PS moderators actually dealing with the problem? No thanks. Ignoring is IMO a form of condoning the fact that the subject matter is okay to post here.
"I used to engage kind of a lot. However, after a lot of engaging but never getting anywhere at all, I finally began".......
.....mostly just really not engaging at all.
I learned this the hard way about PS many years ago, and have been working on firming up that stance for quite a while now. The energy of putting out a well-reasoned and researched response, that results in nothing but frustration when you get the the inevitable deflecting one-liner that reduces to "I believe what I believe because I believe it", or the equally deflecting illogical non sequitur, takes more out of me these days than I can afford to give. It's not worth the energy expenditure anymore. I respond very occasionally, but most of the time, read the fray just for the entertainment value.
About racism. More than politics, more than women's issues, maybe more than religion, racism is THE issue in the US. It has been with us since our founding an is the thing that just will.not.go.away. No one is ever racist and yet somehow racism corrodes our ideals still.
Well, I'm admitting it. I am racist. i was raised in Oklahoma - which is overwhelmingly white - in the 60s and 70s, when it was even more overwhelmingly white. Is there any chance I would not have abundant racist tapes in my head? Not anything my mother ever said, because she almost never talked badly about any group of people. But all the casual, assumed racism of other relatives, the racism that permeated all types of media, and the racist statements that were made because it was assumed (correctly) that they would be unchallenged? Those I absorbed quite like breathing. As did most of us I suspect.
I've been actively working at un-learning it since my late 20s, when I said something that was graciously ignored by the person I said it to, but still embarrasses me to remember to this day. It hit me square between the eyes that I was racist. It was painful to realize this. It was one of those glimpses of an unattractive part of the self, that either makes a person dig deeper to try to understand and root that ugliness out by bringing it to light, or (more often) makes one turn away from the pain of looking. I chose to look and to dig, and I'm digging still. I think the old tapes will ensure that I always have to keep on my toes.
So, basically, I don't think there are many white people who are not racist. There are however, a bunch of us who think we aren't and are highly invested in not looking too closely to check. And the more violent and personally offended the reaction to the idea that you might be expressing something racist, the more the chance that you probably are racist. Think ministers or politicians who rail against gays, only to turn out to be gay themselves. Same kind of thing - methinks thou doth protest too much.
So I've ignored many, maybe most, statements on here that were clearly racist, in the interests of not fanning the flames, and because I've felt it's mostly pointless. Perhaps it's not. Like others, I'm not always sure silence is the way to go - I waffle from time to time - speak out, or shut up. It's a balancing act. Silence is sure as heck more personally peaceful though.
I hardly ever report stuff, because I just don't. It's not my style. I think I've done it twice? since I started on PS. It's also very revealing what people say when they assume no one will challenge them. I do like the idea of concerted stony silence when whole threads are started with a racist theme. And I confess to finding it entertaining to watch the increasingly frantic attempts to goad people into responding.
Annnd....thus ends my (probably) single "big post" of the month. Time to lapse back into my torpor.
Well, I'm admitting it. I am racist.
I've been actively working at un-learning it since my late 20s
So, basically, I don't think there are many white people who are not racist.
This thread is absolutely not about conservatism; it is about racism. I did not draw on any politically based threads, such as the many on Trump, as examples. I really do not care or take offense. The thread I called out in my original thread is one that you agree is "ridiculous" too.
There is a difference between enforcing immigration laws, and re-defining and re-writing those laws as have been done recently to promote xenophobic and Islamophobic, and racist, sentiment. The travel ban to 7 Muslim majority countries and DREAMER deportations are examples of that. So, there are some 'racist' opportunities to come up in the political discussions that are permitted.
As for disagreeing with BLM, I simply do not understand. To me, it is like disagreeing with UNICEF.
Racism is not about your heart--it is about one's words and actions, and the way they impact the world and people around it; just like drunk driving cannot be a matter of the heart--it is a matter of effect--so is racism.
I hope and intend to curb racism on this board--not conservatives. Please do not misunderstand me. Perhaps if that can be clarified, this might become a more hospitable place sooner.
You know, DF, I have been thinking about your "lady bought abalone with her welfare check" story. You use it as a "all people on welfare are bad" story for years. For all you know, she resold that abalone at a profit, so that she could buy even more food and important necessities for her family. As Trump would say isn't that just "good business"? You don't know, DF, you just don't know the facts.Click the "ignore all conservative" button...
The BLM thread really drove it home for me that racism might be better concealed now, but not much has changed.
I wonder if the moderators leave it, because otherwise the forum would be completely dead?
Maybe the thing to do is to email the sponsored vendors of this site to encourage them to pull out. I wonder if the moderators leave racist posts to keep up a mirage the the board is busy. Perhaps they will feel differently, and take care to remove racist posts and posters, if there is a financial incentive to do so.
The thread was reported to me three times, none of the posts reported had any accusations of racism.
______________________________________________________________
Thank you, Ella for clearly stating this, as none was ever intended.
Be careful what you wish for, when free speech is policed it is good until those doing the policing do not agree with you.
_________________________________________________________
Very well said, Ella.
I wonder if the moderators leave it, because otherwise the forum would be completely dead?
Indy, I feel this is closest to the truth regardless of what Ella has said. So many posters have left because of all the political threads, and now it is confirmed that nothing will change. One person should be on a time out. One person. I've seen people banned for much less bad behaviour in the past. So something has definitely changed. I don't need to help pay PS bills. Reddit is better entertainment, and more diverse.
Ruby, mind your own business. We have dealt with situations with the appropriate people as we do with you.Tacori E-ring presented a cogent assessment (IMO) of Ruby as a psychologically damaged person who has been deeply hurt in a thread about the women's march against Trump. Ruby was incensed by Tacori's comments and I feel as though I'm treading on thin ice bringing it up. Tacori's assessment resonated with me. Those who engage with Ruby in an attempt to educate her or others who may be swayed by her words reveal more about themselves than they reveal about Ruby and so I have, much to my dismay, stopped reading their attempts. I have Ruby on ignore because, for me personally, it is the humane thing to do.
______________________________________________________________________
Ella, please clarify how this is not demeaning.