- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,082
Yes, please could this be explained? It’s been set now anyway.Wait, is it no longer flawless because she is holding it with tweezers???
Yes, please could this be explained? It’s been set now anyway.Wait, is it no longer flawless because she is holding it with tweezers???
Wait, is it no longer flawless because she is holding it with tweezers???
I don't! Oh the stress of owning that stone....WOW! , wish it was mine![]()
![]()
That’s a good question.Wow, absolutely no external blemishes. @John Pollard what is the ratio of those diamonds who finish off FL-flawless versus IF- Internally Flawless?
I can clarify here. The yellow sticky-note saying “No tweezers” was an instruction to the lab graders, drawing attention to the fact that we were suing for Flawless. After it went through grading the sticky note was no longer relevant. That said, per @yssie's comments, that photo sequence is comical.Wait, is it no longer flawless because she is holding it with tweezers???Yes, please could this be explained? It’s been set now anyway.
First, I should mention that grading laboratories do not extend the Flawless grade unless the submitter sues for it in writing.
Yes.Is it just one earring...? Sorry if this is a dumb question!
Is it just one earring...? Sorry if this is a dumb question!