shape
carat
color
clarity

Ring Design Details

breanne

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jun 7, 2016
Messages
510
Hello!

I may be overthinking this detail, but I was wondering if anyone can give feedback on why you (or someone) would choose a more flat profiled ring (first pic) to a more rounded profile (second pic).

I have placed little red lines to the area in question as I don’t know the official term for this part of the ring. Part of me thinks it would help allow the following wedding band to sit more flush to have the “flat” version, where the more rounded version would potentially provide more space away from the setting so that the wedding band doesn’t hit the basket as easily?

The third pic is of the “rounded” side profile version with the eternity band I want, however, I do also want a separate plain wedding band to wear. For this reason, I don’t know if there is one profile-type that is better. Again, I may be over thinking this, but any feedback is welcomed.

9230815B-99C5-41CE-9342-7780B9ACC5A7.png368EE5D1-E5BF-474B-9892-3A76E0FD81D8.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 50840B86-4A60-449C-949F-42A22C891ED2.jpeg
    50840B86-4A60-449C-949F-42A22C891ED2.jpeg
    722.3 KB · Views: 30
I think the flatter shank helps the wedding band sit flush. The rounder band is probably ok as well for a flush fitting wedding band. The gap issue usually comes into play if and when the head of the setting extends beyond the bridge of this ring. Are you able to try on what you want or is it being made? Just be sure to tell whoever is supplying the ring that you want your wedding band to sit flush against the engagement ring. The ring and the wedding band you have pictured are beautiful. However, you would probably need a spacer to prevent the stones in the band from chewing up the engagement ring.
 
I think the flatter shank helps the wedding band sit flush. The rounder band is probably ok as well for a flush fitting wedding band. The gap issue usually comes into play if and when the head of the setting extends beyond the bridge of this ring. Are you able to try on what you want or is it being made? Just be sure to tell whoever is supplying the ring that you want your wedding band to sit flush against the engagement ring. The ring and the wedding band you have pictured are beautiful. However, you would probably need a spacer to prevent the stones in the band from chewing up the engagement ring.

Unfortunately, I cannot try it on first, I think this is partly why the little details are consuming me.

I do love how the ER and eternity look together, as mentioned above, the ER is of the more “rounded” profile version in that photo, but when I think of pairing that rounded-profile ER with a plain band, I don’t know if the roundness of it next to the roundness of the ER would look as good. This is partly why I wonder if the more “flat” profile would be better, but again, I wish I could see it all in person to see the options :|

Here is the front view of the two, now do you think a rounded-profile plain band that matches the band of the ER would also look good?

C9908123-FFE5-4BBA-95F5-380FE3AA7601.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 0E1A73FA-DCF9-4BED-A842-00E4CA286042.jpeg
    0E1A73FA-DCF9-4BED-A842-00E4CA286042.jpeg
    66.2 KB · Views: 12
Yes, I do. It may not have the ‘sealed together’ look like it would with the flat surface but I still think it would look good. If the shank pinches in near the diamond, you could also end up with a small gap but I would find that aesthetically pleasing. Which look do you prefer?
 
Yes, I do. It may not have the ‘sealed together’ look like it would with the flat surface but I still think it would look good. If the shank pinches in near the diamond, you could also end up with a small gap but I would find that aesthetically pleasing. Which look do you prefer?

You know, for yearsssss I completely thought I did NOT want a taper. I always thought I wanted the ER and wedding band to be flush in height and width. I could never find that look in person with the thicker band that I prefer, a few months ago I did in fact find a thicker ER and wedding band that was flush in height and width, and I did NOT like it. I was shocked, seriously. I felt like they looked soldered together.

Here is the photo, keep in mind the diamond size was just what they had in store. So now, I realize the taper gives just enough space that they look separate. Now the question is the rounded-profile vs flat. I *think* I prefer the flat, but then again, I was completely wrong about the non-tapered cathedral, so …

All this to say, I want the exact look above, size and all. If now I could only see it with a plain band, that would be incredible.

8C81E2FA-6FD3-4569-90FB-C6978A8E1BAF.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 2930957C-625B-4A90-ABD4-97829A63DB8A.jpeg
    2930957C-625B-4A90-ABD4-97829A63DB8A.jpeg
    63.7 KB · Views: 23
Where are you getting the rings? I am sure your jeweler can find or make an ering with the taper.

Reminds me of this Vatche setting: https://www.whiteflash.com/engageme...n-solitaire-engagement-ring-by-vatche-347.htm

There is someone local that I used for my first ring who would recreate the ring exactly as I prefer, the taper would not be challenging in the slightest. It will really be a matter of the smaller details (flat vs rounded profile for example), and trusting that I may like a ring even if I never tried it on. I don't know now if I'm willing to risk that as what I had originally thought I wanted (re-last message), was not, to my surprise.

I don't know what other option there is, I could always have it 3-D printed, that is what I'm considering at this point.
 
There is someone local that I used for my first ring who would recreate the ring exactly as I prefer, the taper would not be challenging in the slightest. It will really be a matter of the smaller details (flat vs rounded profile for example), and trusting that I may like a ring even if I never tried it on. I don't know now if I'm willing to risk that as what I had originally thought I wanted (re-last message), was not, to my surprise.

I don't know what other option there is, I could always have it 3-D printed, that is what I'm considering at this point.

The 3-D print might be a good way to go. Does your jeweler by any chance make wax molds of new pieces? Do you currently have the eternity band or does it have to be made as well?
 
The 3-D print might be a good way to go. Does your jeweler by any chance make wax molds of new pieces? Do you currently have the eternity band or does it have to be made as well?

I haven't asked actually, that might be a better way to go. I do not have the eternity, this whole set would be an upgrade. Have you ever done a wax mold before for any rings? Did you find it was accurate of the details?

Some other things that I noted that might be something to consider is the height of the stone off my finger, since I would likely upgrade to a 3-3.5 carat, I'd want it to be as low as possible. I know this has limitations, but seeing it done in the photo above is exactly what I want, so I'd like to see that detail as well before committing to ensure I do actually like the height in person.

I realized after my first ring, there are a lot more details that are important to me than I originally expected, so this time I want to ensure I take my time and decide each detail as I probably will not upgrade again.
 
I haven't asked actually, that might be a better way to go. I do not have the eternity, this whole set would be an upgrade. Have you ever done a wax mold before for any rings? Did you find it was accurate of the details?

Some other things that I noted that might be something to consider is the height of the stone off my finger, since I would likely upgrade to a 3-3.5 carat, I'd want it to be as low as possible. I know this has limitations, but seeing it done in the photo above is exactly what I want, so I'd like to see that detail as well before committing to ensure I do actually like the height in person.

I realized after my first ring, there are a lot more details that are important to me than I originally expected, so this time I want to ensure I take my time and decide each detail as I probably will not upgrade again.

No, I have never had a wax mold but others here have through the years. I think it would give you the best visual but if you can get the measurements right on a CAD, it might not be completely necessary.
 
No, I have never had a wax mold but others here have through the years. I think it would give you the best visual but if you can get the measurements right on a CAD, it might not be completely necessary.

I found a place that has a similar setting, I have an appointment on Monday. I will update with some photos!
 
No, I have never had a wax mold but others here have through the years. I think it would give you the best visual but if you can get the measurements right on a CAD, it might not be completely necessary.

So, the setting is nice, it was a very thin version so it was really hard to tell. I am actually surprised to say I like the 6 pronged setting, I used to be only a 4 prong type of gal.

I was able to try on sizes, 9mm and 9.5mm. I tried on a 4 carat and it solidified that it is just too big for me, So, now I need to determine a 3 - 3.5, although a very small difference, for some reason, the look seems completely different from one to another. I will attach photos in the next box.
 
Size 5 finger
3 carat
3, 3.5 carat
3.5 carat
3, 3.5, 4 carat
1.43 (mine), 3, and 3.5 carat
3, 3.5 carat w/ 3mm band .11 carat each

0C505D75-5E3C-48D3-95A6-043437A307D6.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 7F9D67EB-D72B-47D7-BAA1-955C7706C04F.png
    7F9D67EB-D72B-47D7-BAA1-955C7706C04F.png
    747 KB · Views: 243
  • 56CB8D62-E79F-4984-9089-9BC7232C28CA.jpeg
    56CB8D62-E79F-4984-9089-9BC7232C28CA.jpeg
    113 KB · Views: 248
  • 5D8C4C7A-0F59-45EA-9C3B-A94C9BC77889.png
    5D8C4C7A-0F59-45EA-9C3B-A94C9BC77889.png
    889.1 KB · Views: 44
  • 78AE80F2-CCFA-4BCD-BA23-93FED9D88735.jpeg
    78AE80F2-CCFA-4BCD-BA23-93FED9D88735.jpeg
    97.9 KB · Views: 50
  • 1190822C-07C5-4DEA-9BED-75D0270F9C92.jpeg
    1190822C-07C5-4DEA-9BED-75D0270F9C92.jpeg
    107.2 KB · Views: 251
Last edited:
Are these lab diamonds? I ask because most jewelers wouldn’t have that many larger size diamonds to try on in my experience. Which size did you prefer?
 
Are these lab diamonds? I ask because most jewelers wouldn’t have that many larger size diamonds to try on in my experience. Which size did you prefer?

No they are not diamonds, lol! I agree, I've only been to one place that did, and it was locked with gates.

I'm really not sure to be honest, I know we always gravitate to larger things, so it is easier for me to say 3.5, but I wonder if it looks disproportionate.

I graduate as a DC in 2 years, so it is not outside of the realm of my life, but I also want to wear it everyday without it looking too much. I would pair it with a plain band every day, my significant other likes the 3 carat.
 
-8mm from top of finger to top of setting (not my preferred setting, but for sizings sake). This is approx how high I think my original cathedral goal with 3.5 carat would sit.

-Distance view for the 3 carat
 

Attachments

  • 8D400B24-CAA3-4F02-909D-9B26E8D5C82A.jpeg
    8D400B24-CAA3-4F02-909D-9B26E8D5C82A.jpeg
    51.7 KB · Views: 53
  • 9A87FF14-CD29-4CE3-9F5D-67A453421954.jpeg
    9A87FF14-CD29-4CE3-9F5D-67A453421954.jpeg
    53.4 KB · Views: 52
  • A2AD4A23-6DC2-48F9-ADF0-99987950EEB9.jpeg
    A2AD4A23-6DC2-48F9-ADF0-99987950EEB9.jpeg
    195.2 KB · Views: 53
It is strictly a personal judgment. What is right for one is not right for all. You have to go with the size that you feel comfortable wearing and going from a 1.43 to a 3.00 carat is quite a size jump. Price must factor in somewhere as well?
 
It is strictly a personal judgment. What is right for one is not right for all. You have to go with the size that you feel comfortable wearing and going from a 1.43 to a 3.00 carat is quite a size jump. Price must factor in somewhere as well?


I actually budgeted for a 4 carat, so, they're both within range. The 4 carat I can say was too large for me every day.

 
i like the 3 on you but i think you'd get used to whatever size you choose quickly
i think the flat/pipe cut vs. rounded edge is often a comfort thing. most of my rings have the flat edge and i don't find them uncomfortable fwiw. congrats on your upcoming graduation!
 
i like the 3 on you but i think you'd get used to whatever size you choose quickly
i think the flat/pipe cut vs. rounded edge is often a comfort thing. most of my rings have the flat edge and i don't find them uncomfortable fwiw. congrats on your upcoming graduation!

Are you referring to the first setting? That one is mine! :) <3 Although I like much of the setting, the prongs just over power it all together, so I will keep the solitaire at 3mm, but change the prongs and actually add a taper. I used to be anti-taper, but my mind has changed. Ha.

And thank you! It'll be 8 years total by the end, but 1 more year of actually schooling, and one year of clinic, then it's sayonaraaaa. :P
 
i like the 3 on you but i think you'd get used to whatever size you choose quickly
i think the flat/pipe cut vs. rounded edge is often a comfort thing. most of my rings have the flat edge and i don't find them uncomfortable fwiw. congrats on your upcoming graduation!

Oh, and I do feel the 3 looks best. Something seems a bit more understated about it, but I will admit, there are some photos where it does look oddly small.
 

Attachments

  • 9A5C5E8D-D932-419B-8892-56E035D77AEF.png
    9A5C5E8D-D932-419B-8892-56E035D77AEF.png
    747 KB · Views: 22
It is strictly a personal judgment. What is right for one is not right for all. You have to go with the size that you feel comfortable wearing and going from a 1.43 to a 3.00 carat is quite a size jump. Price must factor in somewhere as well?

I believe she is looking at lab stones so the price difference between 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 is somewhat tolerable!
 
I believe she is looking at lab stones so the price difference between 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 is somewhat tolerable!

Makes sense! I had asked earlier if these were labs,
 
I think she thought you were talking about the ones she had tried on which sounds like they may have been
something besides Earth-mined or lab-grown diamonds (maybe moissanite or something else???)
 
I think she thought you were talking about the ones she had tried on which sounds like they may have been
something besides Earth-mined or lab-grown diamonds (maybe moissanite or something else???)

These are moissanite, they were solely for size reference. I will be upgrading to a lab-grown.
 
I think flush/not flush is totally a personal preference. Before getting married, I worried about my ering not fitting well because of a 'donut', but now I actually prefer that it doesn't sit totally flush against the wedding band. Mine ering was rounded as well (waiting for it to be remade at the moment)
 
I think flush/not flush is totally a personal preference. Before getting married, I worried about my ering not fitting well because of a 'donut', but now I actually prefer that it doesn't sit totally flush against the wedding band. Mine ering was rounded as well (waiting for it to be remade at the moment)

I've been able to sort through so many details in the past few weeks!

For the profile view, I think I'm going to opt into an in between version (not totally flat or round). I had a general rendering done, not that you can see that view anyway, but I was told the in between would likely work best!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (293).png
    Screenshot (293).png
    193.6 KB · Views: 30
  • 72C83A45-06F0-4723-A9A9-4AD1E3DC4EDB.jpeg
    72C83A45-06F0-4723-A9A9-4AD1E3DC4EDB.jpeg
    414.2 KB · Views: 31
I've been able to sort through so many details in the past few weeks!

For the profile view, I think I'm going to opt into an in between version (not totally flat or round). I had a general rendering done, not that you can see that view anyway, but I was told the in between would likely work best!

I like the in between! Hope it works out for you!
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top