Superidealist
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2003
- Messages
- 655
To recap:
My original post to which you took offense was in response to brandonb's repeated statements that Whiteflash offered to make an exact copy of a D Vatche ring. After my post, he stated that all his previous statements were inaccurate and that Whiteflash had offered to make a ring that differed only in the slightest from a D Vatche design.
You took me to task for taking brandonb at his word before confirming his statement of the facts with Whiteflash. When I pointed out that you had done the same thing in an earlier post, you qualifed your original statement, saying that your post was acceptable because the vendor was unnamed.
I expressed my opinion that Whiteflash's offer to make a ring that differed only in the slightest from D Vatche's design slimy. Your opinion differs and you don't care what I think, but you you attack this matter of opinion as if it were a fact that can be disputed.
It seems that the only thing that I've done that might have been questionable is taking brandonb at his word in my original post. And this was wrong only because the vendor was named.
We could go on and argue this point until we're blue in the face, but I don't think I want to subject the forum to any more of this nonsense. If you want to continue, please take it up with dimondbob of Whiteflash, who did the same thing I did to a named jeweler in this post.
My original post to which you took offense was in response to brandonb's repeated statements that Whiteflash offered to make an exact copy of a D Vatche ring. After my post, he stated that all his previous statements were inaccurate and that Whiteflash had offered to make a ring that differed only in the slightest from a D Vatche design.
You took me to task for taking brandonb at his word before confirming his statement of the facts with Whiteflash. When I pointed out that you had done the same thing in an earlier post, you qualifed your original statement, saying that your post was acceptable because the vendor was unnamed.
I expressed my opinion that Whiteflash's offer to make a ring that differed only in the slightest from D Vatche's design slimy. Your opinion differs and you don't care what I think, but you you attack this matter of opinion as if it were a fact that can be disputed.
It seems that the only thing that I've done that might have been questionable is taking brandonb at his word in my original post. And this was wrong only because the vendor was named.
We could go on and argue this point until we're blue in the face, but I don't think I want to subject the forum to any more of this nonsense. If you want to continue, please take it up with dimondbob of Whiteflash, who did the same thing I did to a named jeweler in this post.
300x240.png)