I've read all the previous posts on WF vs SC Tiffany Style classic.
1. Has there been any update since early late 2007 on the design at WF or SC?
2, IMO, the WF prong and band seems to be relatively thick in relation to the original. The SC one seems to be more aligned to the original. Any thoughts from anyone in the market for these recently? I'm curious as to how the WF and SC differs from the original, and sometimes I have a bad eye for these things.
http://www.exceldiamonds.com/-Engagement-Rings-5/Solitaire-Diamond-Engagement-Rings-11/Inspired-By-Tiffany-Engagement-Rings--671-640.html
http://www.whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Solitaire/Classic-tiffany-style-Knife-Edge_1137.htm#
http://www.tiffany.com/Engagement/Item.aspx?GroupSKU=GRP10001#f+0/0/0/0/0/0
1. Has there been any update since early late 2007 on the design at WF or SC?
2, IMO, the WF prong and band seems to be relatively thick in relation to the original. The SC one seems to be more aligned to the original. Any thoughts from anyone in the market for these recently? I'm curious as to how the WF and SC differs from the original, and sometimes I have a bad eye for these things.
http://www.exceldiamonds.com/-Engagement-Rings-5/Solitaire-Diamond-Engagement-Rings-11/Inspired-By-Tiffany-Engagement-Rings--671-640.html
http://www.whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Solitaire/Classic-tiffany-style-Knife-Edge_1137.htm#
http://www.tiffany.com/Engagement/Item.aspx?GroupSKU=GRP10001#f+0/0/0/0/0/0