Gypsy
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 40,225
If cast/cad is good for this type of ring, I'm fine with it.
The only reason I was looking at hand forged is because I read some horror stories online that cast platinum is often a cover up job & cracks & gets covered up due to air bubbles.
bastetcat|1334702133|3173678 said:You may want to consider that the ring you have posted may not actually be doable as a hand forge job. It's all the rage right now to have something said to be handforged but IMO that ring doesn't look like something that could be made strictly from sheet metal and wire.
Handforging basically entails what can be done with sheet metal and wire (example baskets and pave work). IMO, a downside would be numberous solder jobs to hold all the various bits and pieces together with the upside being the usually mentioned density of the metal.
Then, there's casting, which of course uses a mold or wax model which is then cast, which certainly gives you great control over intricate work that can't be done with wire and solder, or an easy way to do multiples of a hand fabricated model. Upside to me here is the more of if cast in one piece, the less soldering joints you have. Downside is the usually mentioned porosity of the metal.
A lot of the old rings you see I would guess were die-struck, then hand finished (based on my understanding of places like VanCraeynest that still use die striking and hand chasing/carving techniques for their jewelry). These repros may be cast or just a bad die strike job, who knows...or maybe something in between with some cast pieces soldered in so maybe they are a bit of a mongrel of all the methods.
Since you mentioned something about solder joints on the casting, I thought I ought to say that there's usually a lot less soldering involved with a cast piece. I'm actually quite partial to casting, having taken lost wax casting classes some years ago, and find it quite fun. I also thoroughly enjoyed the hand fab (forged) classes I took as well, but I can't help but notice that people automatically think of casting as low quality, and hand forge as automatically good whereas I feel like each method is equally good depending on what you are trying to go for and not everything that can be done in one can be done in the other, as far as I know.
agreed. I think Steven meant its really not the style he makes...slg47 said:there is nothing wrong with cast settings. this method is in fact superior for making certain designs. your ring doesn't look like most of the rings that steven kirsch makes. in general it's good to go with someone who makes rings in asimilar style to the one that you want.
decodelighted|1334762303|3174202 said:Controversial ... but .... don't reproduce that setting. You're not going to be happy no matter how much you pay. Just keep looking until you find something you love as much or more. A finished setting that will either resized or recrafted exactly. People are just simply NEVER happy when they get antiques copied -- especially not ones like yours. There are just too many things you could end up unhappy with ... and did ya ever think WHY that ring is so sloppy & yuck ... maybe they couldn't do it better. I just don't think anything could meet the imaginary expectations in your head of what you WANT that ring to be.
There are very, very few artisans who can REFINE an antique piece like that and make it even more refined and beautiful than a sloppy original as viewed only by pictures. And they are expensive.
ETA: This isn't a problem of want. It's a problem of math. NO MATTER WHAT YOUR HEART & MIND SAY -- the odds of you getting the ring you want are infintesimal. Everything is based on hope and trust in others. Time and time again we've seen custom reproductions like that go horribly wrong. And even when they go "better" -- the end results NEVER NEVER NEVER match the expectations of the buyer/dreamer. So the vendor gets screwed! And badmouthed etc for not reading the customer's mind correctly enough.
bastetcat|1334702133|3173678 said:You may want to consider that the ring you have posted may not actually be doable as a hand forge job. It's all the rage right now to have something said to be handforged but IMO that ring doesn't look like something that could be made strictly from sheet metal and wire.
Handforging basically entails what can be done with sheet metal and wire (example baskets and pave work). IMO, a downside would be numberous solder jobs to hold all the various bits and pieces together with the upside being the usually mentioned density of the metal.
Then, there's casting, which of course uses a mold or wax model which is then cast, which certainly gives you great control over intricate work that can't be done with wire and solder, or an easy way to do multiples of a hand fabricated model. Upside to me here is the more of if cast in one piece, the less soldering joints you have. Downside is the usually mentioned porosity of the metal.
A lot of the old rings you see I would guess were die-struck, then hand finished (based on my understanding of places like VanCraeynest that still use die striking and hand chasing/carving techniques for their jewelry). These repros may be cast or just a bad die strike job, who knows...or maybe something in between with some cast pieces soldered in so maybe they are a bit of a mongrel of all the methods.
Since you mentioned something about solder joints on the casting, I thought I ought to say that there's usually a lot less soldering involved with a cast piece. I'm actually quite partial to casting, having taken lost wax casting classes some years ago, and find it quite fun. I also thoroughly enjoyed the hand fab (forged) classes I took as well, but I can't help but notice that people automatically think of casting as low quality, and hand forge as automatically good whereas I feel like each method is equally good depending on what you are trying to go for and not everything that can be done in one can be done in the other, as far as I know.
decodelighted|1334762303|3174202 said:Controversial ... but .... don't reproduce that setting. You're not going to be happy no matter how much you pay. Just keep looking until you find something you love as much or more. A finished setting that will either resized or recrafted exactly. People are just simply NEVER happy when they get antiques copied -- especially not ones like yours. There are just too many things you could end up unhappy with ... and did ya ever think WHY that ring is so sloppy & yuck ... maybe they couldn't do it better. I just don't think anything could meet the imaginary expectations in your head of what you WANT that ring to be.
There are very, very few artisans who can REFINE an antique piece like that and make it even more refined and beautiful than a sloppy original as viewed only by pictures. And they are expensive.
ETA: This isn't a problem of want. It's a problem of math. NO MATTER WHAT YOUR HEART & MIND SAY -- the odds of you getting the ring you want are infintesimal. Everything is based on hope and trust in others. Time and time again we've seen custom reproductions like that go horribly wrong. And even when they go "better" -- the end results NEVER NEVER NEVER match the expectations of the buyer/dreamer. So the vendor gets screwed! And badmouthed etc for not reading the customer's mind correctly enough.
PEOPLE OF PRICESCOPE -- can ANYONE post a happy story of someone reproducing a ring of this kind??? ANY EXAMPLE???? In the last 10 years????
![]()
catia|1334916573|3175983 said:I'm pretty naive I guess. After my visit to Sun & learning that people will make custom rings--It was all just so layed back & easy going.
Beavsue of that, I asumed all ring makers were like that--
I just thought you showed them a pic, they gave you a quote & you placed your order, and that no one tries to put their own style on your ring cuz you wanted what you asked for--LOL--naive may be an understatement after reading some stories on PS...