sunnyd
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 7,353
Date: 4/29/2008 5:02:18 PM
Author: chocolatefudge
Hmmmmm.... a tricky one. Do you not think that some days you think your partner is your soulmate and then other days you want to kill him? Or is that just me?? Ha ha!
Seriously though, I think if there is only one person out there for each person then only a very lucky few would ever find them. But I do believe that it is amazing how you can meet someone who you want to spend your life with who you never knew before! I don't know if this is making sense, let me re-phrase it a little. I always think how strange life is that we meet people who we would never had met if cirumstances had been only slightly different. For example, I met my SO in biology class at college. I hadn't wanted to take the class but it was the only one left with a free space and my SO had taken the class the year before but had failed and was re-sitting it. If neither of us had been there we would never have met! Do you see what I am saying? So in some ways I do believe that fate plays a part and maybe does push you together with someone who then perhaps is your soul mate.
I really hope this is making sense!!
I guess when I say working, I mean compromising? And then by that I mean that one person doesn''t always get to do everything they want while the other person sacrifices what they want to do.Date: 4/29/2008 6:45:15 PM
Author: Pandora II
I must admit I don''t get this ''working at relationships'' thing. FI and I don''t put any work into our relationship at all - or at least if its work I hadn''t realised. We''ve been living together for nearly 4 years and have never had an argument (unless you count academic ones on politics - which we both work in) or even raised our voices at each other.
Date: 4/29/2008 7:09:53 PM
Author: sunnyd
I guess when I say working, I mean compromising? And then by that I mean that one person doesn''t always get to do everything they want while the other person sacrifices what they want to do.Date: 4/29/2008 6:45:15 PM
Author: Pandora II
I must admit I don''t get this ''working at relationships'' thing. FI and I don''t put any work into our relationship at all - or at least if its work I hadn''t realised. We''ve been living together for nearly 4 years and have never had an argument (unless you count academic ones on politics - which we both work in) or even raised our voices at each other.
Or working to grow together. Or just plain learning about the other person.
Okay so apparently I''ve never thought about it!We never really fight either, so as soon I need a reason to ''work'', I''ll define it. Hee!
This is how it is for us too. He was in a serious relationship when we met (myspace!Date: 4/29/2008 6:45:15 PM
Author: Pandora II
I think there are a number of people in the world who could potential be the perfect partner.
I feel very lucky to be with someone who I do feel is one of those people for me. Since the moment we met it was like coming home and as if we had known each other all our lives. It was a very odd feeling that I have never had before. I knew without a doubt that I would be with him forever (enough to throw away 6 months worth of plans to move back to Italy, a new job and my current SO in 2 hours).
I must admit I don''t get this ''working at relationships'' thing. FI and I don''t put any work into our relationship at all - or at least if its work I hadn''t realised. We''ve been living together for nearly 4 years and have never had an argument (unless you count academic ones on politics - which we both work in) or even raised our voices at each other.
Isn''t that what I said?Date: 4/29/2008 11:09:29 PM
Author: musey
RE: working at relationships...
I don''t think it''s all that realistic to expect a relationship to stay blissfully happy for 50+ years without ''work''--and by that, I mean attention to things that can be taken for granted in a relatively newer relationship (sex life, anyone?). I wouldn''t necessarily call it ''work,'' just effort. I guess. More preventative measures, to keep it from becoming dull, than anything else.
That's how I see it, anyway. I don't personally know any couple that's been together more than 10 years who wouldn't say that they've had to "work" at it, but I don't think that everyone's definition of "work" is the same. Pandora and Freke were saying they don't get the "working at it" thing, and that may be why--their definition of "working at it" may be heavy couples' counseling and long discussions about "us." (Or maybe I'm wrong and they just mean they don't have to make an effort with each other, and it's still blissful? Lucky ladies!!Date: 4/30/2008 11:27:05 AM
Author: sunnyd
Isn't that what I said?Date: 4/29/2008 11:09:29 PM
Author: musey
RE: working at relationships...
I don't think it's all that realistic to expect a relationship to stay blissfully happy for 50+ years without 'work'--and by that, I mean attention to things that can be taken for granted in a relatively newer relationship (sex life, anyone?). I wouldn't necessarily call it 'work,' just effort. I guess. More preventative measures, to keep it from becoming dull, than anything else.Just kidding. I like this definition. And Gwendolyn is a perfect example! Sometimes things can just stop working naturally for the couple, so you make an effort to keep it going. Maybe?
My definition of working at it....hmmm...it''s not couples counseling and it''s not long discussions about our relationship. I guess in a way we haven''t had to deal with it-yet.Date: 4/30/2008 12:18:06 PM
Author: musey
That''s how I see it, anyway. I don''t personally know any couple that''s been together more than 10 years who wouldn''t say that they''ve had to ''work'' at it, but I don''t think that everyone''s definition of ''work'' is the same. Pandora and Freke were saying they don''t get the ''working at it'' thing, and that may be why--their definition of ''working at it'' may be heavy couples'' counseling and long discussions about ''us.'' (Or maybe I''m wrong and they just mean they don''t have to make an effort with each other, and it''s still blissful? Lucky ladies!!Date: 4/30/2008 11:27:05 AM
Author: sunnyd
Isn''t that what I said?Date: 4/29/2008 11:09:29 PM
Author: musey
RE: working at relationships...
I don''t think it''s all that realistic to expect a relationship to stay blissfully happy for 50+ years without ''work''--and by that, I mean attention to things that can be taken for granted in a relatively newer relationship (sex life, anyone?). I wouldn''t necessarily call it ''work,'' just effort. I guess. More preventative measures, to keep it from becoming dull, than anything else.Just kidding. I like this definition. And Gwendolyn is a perfect example! Sometimes things can just stop working naturally for the couple, so you make an effort to keep it going. Maybe?)
My definition of ''working at it,'' like I said, is simply having to put effort in here and there, watching out for pitfalls and dealing with them as they come, not just letting things be as they are.
I guess, though there are things I consider 'working on it' that I wouldn't call effort...ful? Effort is hard to define, because while some of the things I do I'd call 'making an effort,' they feel effortless. I guess that falls into the paying attention pile.Date: 4/30/2008 7:51:11 PM
Author: FrekeChild
Perhaps effort=work?