vespergirl
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2007
- Messages
- 5,497
Here is a link to the article:
http://www.parentdish.com/2010/01/29/moms-have-more-leisure-time-than-they-think/
I have to say that even though I think this is total crap for working moms (there''s no way working moms have 30 hours of free time a week), for SAHMs like myself and several of my friends, this is sometimes true. I guess it depends on how many kids you have, what ages they are, what their temperaments are like, and how controlling of a parent you are/what your attitude is towards raising kids, but I have plenty of free time.
Whenever I watch Oprah, and she says that being a SAHM is the hardest job in the world, I totally disagree with her, even though I know that she needs to pander to us because we''re her audience. I have to say that I had a high-pressure, highly paid corporate career before I had my son, and that was far more challenging and exhausting than hanging out with my kid all day.
until my son was about 18 months old, he slept anywhere from 12 - 16 hours a day (now he sleeps about 12 hours per day), which meant that I had tons of free time while he was asleep (he used to nap 4 hours a day as a baby, and now he naps 1-2 hours a day). I worked out every day, and had plenty of time to read. I do a couple of hours of housework every day (laundry, cooking, tidying up, shopping for groceries, etc.) but that still leaves me with many hours to do other things that I enjoy. We play, I read to him and I take him to the park, but I don''t consider that stressful. He has a great imagination & is good at playing on his own, so during that time I can read the internet or a magazine, or talk on the phone. I''m also not a controlling type personality, so there are a lot of things that I let slide (it''s not going to kill him to watch a video, for example) and I don''t think that everything has to be done perfectly every day, so I don''t stress myself out. My days were definitely more full and structured when I was working full time. I''m sure that I''ll be busier when my 2nd baby is born in a few weeks, but I still don''t think I''ll be as busy as, say, my husband is. And, as I said before, I think that moms who work have it the worst, because then you are doing two jobs, especially if your husband isn''t helpful.
Honestly, I often find it irritating when I hear another SAHM complain about how overworked she is - I think that moms with full-time jobs are far more overworked, and I feel very fortunate that I''m able to stay home and my only responsibility is looking after children. My husband has an incredibly stressful job, works on average 11 hours a day, spends another 3 in the car commuting, and only averages about 6 hours of sleep a night. That is far more difficult than what I do.
Anyway, I thought this was interesting, and was curious to find out how other people felt about this - I know that everyone has vastly different experiences wth parenting, so I wonder what your reactions are to this study ...
http://www.parentdish.com/2010/01/29/moms-have-more-leisure-time-than-they-think/
I have to say that even though I think this is total crap for working moms (there''s no way working moms have 30 hours of free time a week), for SAHMs like myself and several of my friends, this is sometimes true. I guess it depends on how many kids you have, what ages they are, what their temperaments are like, and how controlling of a parent you are/what your attitude is towards raising kids, but I have plenty of free time.
Whenever I watch Oprah, and she says that being a SAHM is the hardest job in the world, I totally disagree with her, even though I know that she needs to pander to us because we''re her audience. I have to say that I had a high-pressure, highly paid corporate career before I had my son, and that was far more challenging and exhausting than hanging out with my kid all day.
until my son was about 18 months old, he slept anywhere from 12 - 16 hours a day (now he sleeps about 12 hours per day), which meant that I had tons of free time while he was asleep (he used to nap 4 hours a day as a baby, and now he naps 1-2 hours a day). I worked out every day, and had plenty of time to read. I do a couple of hours of housework every day (laundry, cooking, tidying up, shopping for groceries, etc.) but that still leaves me with many hours to do other things that I enjoy. We play, I read to him and I take him to the park, but I don''t consider that stressful. He has a great imagination & is good at playing on his own, so during that time I can read the internet or a magazine, or talk on the phone. I''m also not a controlling type personality, so there are a lot of things that I let slide (it''s not going to kill him to watch a video, for example) and I don''t think that everything has to be done perfectly every day, so I don''t stress myself out. My days were definitely more full and structured when I was working full time. I''m sure that I''ll be busier when my 2nd baby is born in a few weeks, but I still don''t think I''ll be as busy as, say, my husband is. And, as I said before, I think that moms who work have it the worst, because then you are doing two jobs, especially if your husband isn''t helpful.
Honestly, I often find it irritating when I hear another SAHM complain about how overworked she is - I think that moms with full-time jobs are far more overworked, and I feel very fortunate that I''m able to stay home and my only responsibility is looking after children. My husband has an incredibly stressful job, works on average 11 hours a day, spends another 3 in the car commuting, and only averages about 6 hours of sleep a night. That is far more difficult than what I do.
Anyway, I thought this was interesting, and was curious to find out how other people felt about this - I know that everyone has vastly different experiences wth parenting, so I wonder what your reactions are to this study ...