- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 14,263
jemo|1411246135|3754427 said:My engagment ring and wedding eternity band!
Stunning!
jemo|1411246135|3754427 said:My engagment ring and wedding eternity band!
LOOK AT THOSE SPARKLES!! I LOVE IT. congratulations, it's always nice to hear when the man picks something the woman loves!ThrillofIce1014|1411746282|3757366 said:Posted on Under 1ct forum but figured no better place than the main show-off thread!
Here's my beauty! Recently engaged and madly in love not only with my FI, but with the ring he made for me. It's a .7 ct round brilliant XXX, G color, VS1 clarity with an additional .5 cts in stones set in the 18k WG Frederick Goldman channel alternating round and princess cuts. I never thought of wanting a half bezel, however, the moment I saw it, it was love. He knows I use my hands a lot and I can be a clutz, soooo, he thought it wouldn't get snagged on anything and the diamond would be more secure.
Sorry for the large pics in advance! What do you think??
dawnxcui|1411749572|3757392 said:LOOK AT THOSE SPARKLES!! I LOVE IT. congratulations, it's always nice to hear when the man picks something the woman loves!ThrillofIce1014|1411746282|3757366 said:Posted on Under 1ct forum but figured no better place than the main show-off thread!
Here's my beauty! Recently engaged and madly in love not only with my FI, but with the ring he made for me. It's a .7 ct round brilliant XXX, G color, VS1 clarity with an additional .5 cts in stones set in the 18k WG Frederick Goldman channel alternating round and princess cuts. I never thought of wanting a half bezel, however, the moment I saw it, it was love. He knows I use my hands a lot and I can be a clutz, soooo, he thought it wouldn't get snagged on anything and the diamond would be more secure.
Sorry for the large pics in advance! What do you think??
nala|1412050622|3759019 said:
tmot14|1413696292|3769325 said:Thanks! Here's a profile shot.
I actually decided that the yellow of the I diamond bothered me too much and quickly sent it back to WF for an upgraded diamond (I plan for this to be my 'forever ring', and wanted to make sure I stayed in the return period for my setting). Here it is with an F stone instead . Pics aren't the best since they were taken with my cell phone.
This diamond performs SO MUCH better, but it's a tad smaller (1.354 ct). I'm still looking at a few more options before I fully commit since I had wanted to stay >1.5ct but I really, really love this ring!
Scoupe|1399825136|3670394 said:
TheDude77|1413917807|3770485 said:Looking for a ring for my very special lady. I like this design, anyone have a link to something similar? We liked the appearance of the 3 stone rings and I think this gives a similar appearance but would allow me to purchase a larger center diamond.
Regarding the 3 stone rings, I saw some with 0.5 center - looked proportional and nice on her small hand (4.5 ring size). Do the 0.7 or 1.0 centre with 2 adjacent diamonds appear to be a little over the top? It is not my intent to be 'cheap', but in my opinion appearance/proportionality should take precedence over breaking the 1.0 carat mark. Any thoughts are welcome, I'm very new to this.
Thanks!
mountainlion said:After several months of diamond shopping and then waiting on the band to be built, here is my future fiance's engagement ring:
2.28 ct fancy yellow VS2 56% table, 69.3% depth, Ex Polish, VG Sym, GIA inscr.
Band: .33 ct round brilliants in 18k white gold, 18k yellow head/prongs