dragonfly411
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 7,378
rainwood said:There are at least 4 or 5 books I'm interested in so I'd be happy with most of the ones on the list.
But if the thread opens in 2 weeks because that's when most people expect to finish and start discussing, I'm going to have to pass. I don't have the leisure time to read a 450 page book in 2 weeks, and if this thread is like most, the discussion will be hot and heavy in the first few days then taper off. By the time I finished, everyone would be off reading and discussing some other book, and I'd feel like I'm chasing a train I'll never catch.
A month is what has worked in the book clubs I'm familiar with, and that's what I'd be willing to commit to. If 2 weeks is what works better for most of you, I'll just have to leave the book club to you speed demons!
Elrohwen said:rainwood said:There are at least 4 or 5 books I'm interested in so I'd be happy with most of the ones on the list.
But if the thread opens in 2 weeks because that's when most people expect to finish and start discussing, I'm going to have to pass. I don't have the leisure time to read a 450 page book in 2 weeks, and if this thread is like most, the discussion will be hot and heavy in the first few days then taper off. By the time I finished, everyone would be off reading and discussing some other book, and I'd feel like I'm chasing a train I'll never catch.
A month is what has worked in the book clubs I'm familiar with, and that's what I'd be willing to commit to. If 2 weeks is what works better for most of you, I'll just have to leave the book club to you speed demons!
I agree with this too. I'm willing to participate in discussions while reading, but there's no way I'll be finished in two weeks. A month is probably more doable, or even a month and a half since I'm currently reading two other books that I'd like to finish. If it were shorter maybe, but 450 pages is a lot in a short time period!
AGBF said:Elrohwen said:rainwood said:There are at least 4 or 5 books I'm interested in so I'd be happy with most of the ones on the list.
But if the thread opens in 2 weeks because that's when most people expect to finish and start discussing, I'm going to have to pass. I don't have the leisure time to read a 450 page book in 2 weeks, and if this thread is like most, the discussion will be hot and heavy in the first few days then taper off. By the time I finished, everyone would be off reading and discussing some other book, and I'd feel like I'm chasing a train I'll never catch.
A month is what has worked in the book clubs I'm familiar with, and that's what I'd be willing to commit to. If 2 weeks is what works better for most of you, I'll just have to leave the book club to you speed demons!
I agree with this too. I'm willing to participate in discussions while reading, but there's no way I'll be finished in two weeks. A month is probably more doable, or even a month and a half since I'm currently reading two other books that I'd like to finish. If it were shorter maybe, but 450 pages is a lot in a short time period!
There is no rule that says this has to be read in two weeks rather than a month, at least no rule I can remember and I have been in the book club since its inception. The problem with having a discussion in one month (if everyone agrees to it), is enforcing it. We have to agree not to start any threads to discuss the book until a certain date that is specified in advance. That can be done if people want to do it.
Deb/AGBF