hehe, those are cool!!! Interesting read, thanksDate: 2/11/2008 6:09:50 PM
Author: strmrdr
this one is funky but kinda kewl lol
Ok..., here is one for you...Date: 2/11/2008 6:03:38 PM
Author: strmrdr
40% im allready off on the next design heheheheheDate: 2/11/2008 5:43:38 PM
Author: DiaGem
Table size?
And a profile rendering...
thanks :}Date: 2/12/2008 1:02:51 PM
Author: Skippy123
hehe, those are cool!!! Interesting read, thanksDate: 2/11/2008 6:09:50 PM
Author: strmrdr
this one is funky but kinda kewl lolNotice my avatar![]()
![]()
Iv got a couple in that range with 10% crowns, it might be do able with 3c/2p but 3c/3p I doubt it.Date: 2/12/2008 1:47:19 PM
Author: DiaGem
Ok..., here is one for you...Date: 2/11/2008 6:03:38 PM
Author: strmrdr
40% im allready off on the next design heheheheheDate: 2/11/2008 5:43:38 PM
Author: DiaGem
Table size?
And a profile rendering...
Try to design the spreadiest/shallowest Asscher Cut based on a 60-40 model...
60% of the depth in the pavilion and 40% of the height on the crown...
Total depth around 45-48%
There is got to be a great combination there somewhere...
I want to see results please.Date: 2/11/2008 5:33:04 PM
Author: strmrdr
c
47
36.55
25
p
46 Storm..., can you give me an appearance but change this one to 52
37 change to 41
34
ch 24.3
td: 70.3
t 40%
But I had too make p3 a lot smaller to pull this one off.
edit: Id buy this stone in a heartbeat yummy!
Can you show me this in a 15 deg. tilt? And a profile renderings?Date: 2/20/2008 3:04:22 PM
Author: strmrdr
c
47
36.55
25
p
52
41
31 <--- note change here.
ch 24.3
td: 75.7
t 40%
Ok..., try:Date: 2/20/2008 3:12:26 PM
Author: strmrdr
15 degree tilt.
imho these small tabled high crown asschers need a bit of contrast under the table too balance the contrast lost with the small table.
Id consider this one over optimised or at least on the border of being so.
nope couldn''t....Date: 2/20/2008 3:27:54 PM
Author: strmrdr
td becomes 75.2% I think I can make this combo work by playing with pavilion facet placement.
What is the minimum movement in your opinion?Date: 2/20/2008 3:35:29 PM
Author: strmrdr
nope couldn''t....Date: 2/20/2008 3:27:54 PM
Author: strmrdr
td becomes 75.2% I think I can make this combo work by playing with pavilion facet placement.
The only way to get some contrast back is move p2 away from 41 degrees.
I think I kind''a prefer the 41 deg. option...Date: 2/20/2008 3:59:23 PM
Author: strmrdr
around 52 42 36 works but depth is back up too 78.2%.
this is getting funny you keep moving me back too 41 and I keep moving away from it lolDate: 2/20/2008 4:07:44 PM
Author: DiaGem
I think I kind''a prefer the 41 deg. option...Date: 2/20/2008 3:59:23 PM
Author: strmrdr
around 52 42 36 works but depth is back up too 78.2%.
Strmrdr,Date: 2/20/2008 3:07:04 PM
Author: strmrdr
its a kicken combo for brightness but the contrast decreased.
I cant my vid card doesnt support the protocal needed for the advanced stuff and I cant upgrade the vid card in this machine.Date: 2/20/2008 4:14:05 PM
Author: Serg
Strmrdr,Date: 2/20/2008 3:07:04 PM
Author: strmrdr
its a kicken combo for brightness but the contrast decreased.
please publish Etas image for this version Asscher cut
Download does not workDate: 2/20/2008 4:28:07 PM
Author: strmrdr
I have too take off for a while but here is the gem file if it will help...
If you do not wish to download this file, click the "cancel" button near the bottom of this dialog. If you wish to download this file, click the "next" button near the bottom of this dialog.
thats the standard warning that it gives for any file since PS has no controll over the contents of the file.Date: 2/20/2008 5:04:12 PM
Author: Serg
Date: 2/20/2008 4:28:07 PM
Author: strmrdr
I have too take off for a while but here is the gem file if it will help...
Download does not work
'Download File Warning
Warning, you are downloading a file that could contain potentially harmful data. This bulletin board system is not responsible for the content of the file you are about to download.
If you do not wish to download this file, click the 'cancel' button near the bottom of this dialog. If you wish to download this file, click the 'next' button near the bottom of this dialog.
'
????
Even funnier...Date: 2/20/2008 5:01:47 PM
Author: tberube
WOW! Haha...that''s really funny, but alarming at the same time. Makes me kinda wish that diamond prices went by diameter rather than weight.
No..., I am fighting yield calculations!!!Date: 2/20/2008 4:13:50 PM
Author: strmrdr
this is getting funny you keep moving me back too 41 and I keep moving away from it lolDate: 2/20/2008 4:07:44 PM
Author: DiaGem
I think I kind''a prefer the 41 deg. option...Date: 2/20/2008 3:59:23 PM
Author: strmrdr
around 52 42 36 works but depth is back up too 78.2%.
It really comes down too the amount of contrast you want in a stone and its personal preference.
keeping it around 41 gives the RA effect of small conrast.
Part of it may be that I think in the 1 to 2 maybe 3ct range and you think in the 5-10ct range.. maybe?