Why cut asschers with small corners and windmills?

[strmrdr]

not sure which you wanted this a virtual dialight side view...

 

[strmrdr]

this one is funky but kinda kewl lol

 

[Skippy123]

Date: 2/11/2008 6:09:50 PM
Author: strmrdr
this one is funky but kinda kewl lol

hehe, those are cool!!! Interesting read, thanks

Notice my avatar

 

[diagem]

Date: 2/11/2008 6:03:38 PM
Author: strmrdr

Date: 2/11/2008 5:43:38 PM
Author: DiaGem
Table size?
And a profile rendering...

40% im allready off on the next design hehehehehe

Ok..., here is one for you...

Try to design the spreadiest/shallowest Asscher Cut based on a 60-40 model...

60% of the depth in the pavilion and 40% of the height on the crown...

Total depth around 45-48%


There is got to be a great combination there somewhere...

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 2/12/2008 1:02:51 PM
Author: Skippy123

Date: 2/11/2008 6:09:50 PM
Author: strmrdr
this one is funky but kinda kewl lol

hehe, those are cool!!! Interesting read, thanks

Notice my avatar

thanks :}
kicken :}

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 2/12/2008 1:47:19 PM
Author: DiaGem

Date: 2/11/2008 6:03:38 PM
Author: strmrdr

Date: 2/11/2008 5:43:38 PM
Author: DiaGem
Table size?
And a profile rendering...

40% im allready off on the next design hehehehehe

Ok..., here is one for you...

Try to design the spreadiest/shallowest Asscher Cut based on a 60-40 model...

60% of the depth in the pavilion and 40% of the height on the crown...

Total depth around 45-48%


There is got to be a great combination there somewhere...

Iv got a couple in that range with 10% crowns, it might be do able with 3c/2p but 3c/3p I doubt it.
I played with it a little and the light return was in the 30% range due too the pavilion angles.
It will have too wait until I figure out the cut designer.

 

[strmrdr]

shallow asscher cuts:
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/45817/

 

[diagem]

Date: 2/11/2008 5:33:04 PM
Author: strmrdr
c
47
36.55
25

p
46 Storm..., can you give me an appearance but change this one to 52
37 change to 41
34
ch 24.3
td: 70.3
t 40%

But I had too make p3 a lot smaller to pull this one off.

edit: Id buy this stone in a heartbeat yummy!

I want to see results please.

Thanks,

 

[strmrdr]

c
47
36.55
25
p
52
41
31 <--- note change here.
ch 24.3
td: 75.7
t 40%

 

[strmrdr]

its a kicken combo for brightness but the contrast decreased.

 

[strmrdr]

15 degree tilt.

imho these small tabled high crown asschers need a bit of contrast under the table too balance the contrast lost with the small table.
Id consider this one over optimised or at least on the border of being so.

 

[diagem]

Date: 2/20/2008 3:04:22 PM
Author: strmrdr

c
47
36.55
25

p
52
41
31 <--- note change here.
ch 24.3
td: 75.7
t 40%

Can you show me this in a 15 deg. tilt? And a profile renderings?
Why did you go shallower on c3? because of the td%?

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 2/20/2008 3:15:27 PM
Author: DiaGem
Can you show me this in a 15 deg. tilt? And a profile renderings?
Why did you go shallower on c3? because of the td%?

center became a tiny tiny dot so changed the p3, c3 is the same, would look like a black hole.

 

[diagem]

Date: 2/20/2008 3:12:26 PM
Author: strmrdr
15 degree tilt.

imho these small tabled high crown asschers need a bit of contrast under the table too balance the contrast lost with the small table.
Id consider this one over optimised or at least on the border of being so.

Ok..., try:

p
50
41
33
ch 24.3
td: 72% +/-
t 40%

Let see if it brings back a bit of contrast...

 

[strmrdr]

td becomes 75.2% I think I can make this combo work by playing with pavilion facet placement.

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 2/20/2008 3:27:54 PM
Author: strmrdr
td becomes 75.2% I think I can make this combo work by playing with pavilion facet placement.

nope couldn''t....
The only way to get some contrast back is move p2 away from 41 degrees.

 

[diagem]

Date: 2/20/2008 3:35:29 PM
Author: strmrdr

Date: 2/20/2008 3:27:54 PM
Author: strmrdr
td becomes 75.2% I think I can make this combo work by playing with pavilion facet placement.

nope couldn''t....
The only way to get some contrast back is move p2 away from 41 degrees.

What is the minimum movement in your opinion?

 

[strmrdr]

around 52 42 36 works but depth is back up too 78.2%.

 

[strmrdr]

edit: 10 degrees tilt shows its going too have large scint events as the large black areas shift around under the table.

 

[strmrdr]

here is 15 degrees

 

[diagem]

Date: 2/20/2008 3:59:23 PM
Author: strmrdr
around 52 42 36 works but depth is back up too 78.2%.

I think I kind''a prefer the 41 deg. option...

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 2/20/2008 4:07:44 PM
Author: DiaGem

Date: 2/20/2008 3:59:23 PM
Author: strmrdr
around 52 42 36 works but depth is back up too 78.2%.

I think I kind''a prefer the 41 deg. option...

this is getting funny you keep moving me back too 41 and I keep moving away from it lol
It really comes down too the amount of contrast you want in a stone and its personal preference.
keeping it around 41 gives the RA effect of small conrast.
Part of it may be that I think in the 1 to 2 maybe 3ct range and you think in the 5-10ct range.. maybe?

 

[Serg]

Date: 2/20/2008 3:07:04 PM
Author: strmrdr
its a kicken combo for brightness but the contrast decreased.

Strmrdr,
please publish Etas image for this version Asscher cut

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 2/20/2008 4:14:05 PM
Author: Serg

Date: 2/20/2008 3:07:04 PM
Author: strmrdr
its a kicken combo for brightness but the contrast decreased.

Strmrdr,
please publish Etas image for this version Asscher cut

I cant my vid card doesnt support the protocal needed for the advanced stuff and I cant upgrade the vid card in this machine.

edit: can you run it on a gem file or do you need the dmc?

 

[strmrdr]

I have too take off for a while but here is the gem file if it will help...

 

[tberube]

WOW! Haha...that''s really funny, but alarming at the same time. Makes me kinda wish that diamond prices went by diameter rather than weight.

 

[Serg]

Date: 2/20/2008 4:28:07 PM
Author: strmrdr
I have too take off for a while but here is the gem file if it will help...

Download does not work

"Download File Warning

Warning, you are downloading a file that could contain potentially harmful data. This bulletin board system is not responsible for the content of the file you are about to download.

If you do not wish to download this file, click the "cancel" button near the bottom of this dialog. If you wish to download this file, click the "next" button near the bottom of this dialog.

"

????

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 2/20/2008 5:04:12 PM
Author: Serg

Date: 2/20/2008 4:28:07 PM
Author: strmrdr
I have too take off for a while but here is the gem file if it will help...

Download does not work

'Download File Warning

Warning, you are downloading a file that could contain potentially harmful data. This bulletin board system is not responsible for the content of the file you are about to download.

If you do not wish to download this file, click the 'cancel' button near the bottom of this dialog. If you wish to download this file, click the 'next' button near the bottom of this dialog.

'

????

thats the standard warning that it gives for any file since PS has no controll over the contents of the file.

Im off again in a few min. but will be back later tonight.

edit: check your email, I found your address in my contacts and sent you the dmc.

 

[diagem]

Date: 2/20/2008 5:01:47 PM
Author: tberube
WOW! Haha...that''s really funny, but alarming at the same time. Makes me kinda wish that diamond prices went by diameter rather than weight.

Even funnier...

What if they went by design and not by diameter or weight???

Hohoho...

 

[diagem]

Date: 2/20/2008 4:13:50 PM
Author: strmrdr

Date: 2/20/2008 4:07:44 PM
Author: DiaGem

Date: 2/20/2008 3:59:23 PM
Author: strmrdr
around 52 42 36 works but depth is back up too 78.2%.

I think I kind''a prefer the 41 deg. option...

this is getting funny you keep moving me back too 41 and I keep moving away from it lol
It really comes down too the amount of contrast you want in a stone and its personal preference.
keeping it around 41 gives the RA effect of small conrast.
Part of it may be that I think in the 1 to 2 maybe 3ct range and you think in the 5-10ct range.. maybe?

No..., I am fighting yield calculations!!!