Angelina Joli Pregnant!

[lmurden]

Date: 1/17/2006 4:10:51 PM
Author: Caribou

Date: 1/17/2006 4:05:21 PM
Author: lmurden
Wow!

You really think that the adoption thing is fake and that he''s a snake???

I''m sure Angelina would have adopted regardless of being with Brad. I can only wish them the best since there are children involved.

I don''t think that of Angelina, at all. I totally respect her for adopting her kids (actually I have a huge amount of respect for any one who adopts) and she seems genuenily (horrible spelling) into her kids. I''ve never seen them with a nanny like you do a lot of celebraties.

However,I do not trust Brad Pitt''s intentions ...from the minute I heard that he was doing that I thought it was not in the best intentions. Actually the more I think about, I feel most sorry for her kids but I''m starting feel sorry for her. I really do believe he''s a snake and only out for himself.

I hear you and think it is best for us to agree to disagree.

Okie dokie

 

[Caribou]

Date: 1/17/2006 4:20:43 PM
Author: lmurden
I hear you and think it is best for us to agree to disagree.

Okie dokie

Sounds good. It''s interesting the different opinions, I think.

 

[devientdrow]

Thats interesting Caribou, I haven''t really heard anyone have that take on Brad before. Very interesting.

As far as I can remember I haven''t read anything eithier about Jen saying her career should go first but I''d think actions speak louder than words. Brad does what? A movie per year? She takes them as fast as she can get them, I wonder how much time they even got to spend together? But she is talented, I really liked her in a few odd comedies. I think those were better than the highly promoted movies i''ve seen her in.

You know what all this makes me think? That God know one is this interested in my life! hahaha

 

[platinumrock]

I can say that Jennifer Aniston looks glamorous...but I wouldn''t call her beautiful, nor does she possess typical Hollywood looks. Her facial symmetry is average. Talented enough to win an Oscar? I doubt it. She''s great in romantic comedies, like Meg Ryan, but that''s about it. She''s still "Rachel" doing movies. From the way she looked in Ferris Bueller (spelling?), to the first season of Friends until the series finale, it''s obvious that money has been a factor in her transformation. She can afford the best "team" to help her look the way she does. But I would be afraid to see her just roll out of bed without make-up and into the public.....not a pleasant sight. Brad Pitt must have really loved her and appreciated her inner beauty. Unfortunately, things didn''t work out. And that''s how life is. He cut his losses and moved on.

Angelina Jolie, however, had a different transformaton. She went from weird goth-looking girl who had a wild past to glowing low-maintenance mom who wants to contribute to the world. I''ve seen her dolled up and glamorous, where she looks almost ethereal, like a mythic goddess. I''ve also seen her in jeans, pony-tail, no make-up...and she''s still gorgeous. How many women in Hollywood can pull that off? In real life? I think it''s easier to hate Angelina Jolie (who can easily be placed in the unattainable model category) than Jennifer Aniston, the approachable girl-next-door (cute but non-threatening category). She and Jennifer Lopez are the perfect examples of ordinary looking girls with one great feature (booty for J-Lo, hair for Jen), that got expensive make-overs. So I can understand where Jennifer Aniston supporters are coming from. After all, if you watch Friends, she''s no stranger to your home.

I don''t know that much about these people, but I do know that it''s over between Brad and Jennifer. Their divorce is final. I don''t understand why people are so obsessed with the cause of the divorce (Brad accused of cheating), almost in the same fashion as the obsession with Angelina''s past (accusations of incestual relatioship with brother). It''s as if people refuse to believe that they have anything else to offer besides their looks. Why are they the bad guys again?

Jennifer and Brad looked good together on the red carpet when they''re dolled up, but that''s about it. Aesthetically, Brad and Angelina make a much sexier couple. Watch "Mr. and Mrs. Smith". You will see. They are symmetrically, proportionately and genetically equal. They can both roll out of bed, into the public and look hot. Career wise, they seem to be on the same level. They seem to want the same things in life and have a lot more in common. And did I mention chemistry? Honestly, I think Brad and Angelina settled in their past marriages. They chose security over compatibility. After seeing the development of their relationship, there''s no question that they found something in each other. The One? The ideal mate? I really hope so. They have a stronger reason to make this work: their children. A reason larger than themselves. They have a family to think about and keep together now. It saddens me that there are people who wish ill on those who are actually doing something good in this world: parents who are in love and want to raise their children together.

Speaking of children, can you imagine the genes on that baby? With Brad''s facial symmetry and Angelina''s bone structure, that''s gonna be one gorgeous kid! I wouldn''t be surprised if this baby makes People magazine''s cover as "Sexiest Baby Alive". Yeah, there''s a possibility that two hot parents can cancel each other out and produce a fugly kid. But with probability on their side, that''s unlikely. Both parents have hot genes, so the probability of the child being hot or hotter than the parents is increased significantly.

Wishing the future Mrs. Pitt a healthy pregnancy!

 

[Caribou]

I guess I''m the minortiy here and like Jennifer Aniston over Angelina Jolie. I don''t really understand the appeal as far as her looks, she''s odd looking to me. And I disagree that her and Pitt would have better looking babies than Jennifer Aniston and Pitt.

But I''ve never liked Brad Pitt, there''s just something about him that seems untrusting.

 

[diamondsrock]

I''m with you, Caribou. I always liked Jennifer Aniston. Never a big fan of Angelina.

 

[devientdrow]

Platrock, GREAT points!! It''s all about marketability, how someone markets themselves sooooooo changes how people see them. Jen has marketed herself as a the sweet girl next door when really you read certain things about her that will make you say wow....she is a little partier sometimes huh? The best movie I loved her in was a dark comedy/drama The Good Girl with Jake Gyllenhall. LOVED it. In the movie she was a wife having an affair with a younger man at her wal mart style job. In the movie she was sarcastic and depressed and she rocked at. It was the best role i''ve seen her in, I think I thought so highly of it because it wasn''t the romantic comedy where she is bubbly and funny....she was average and drab and bleak and it was refreshing. It''s a good movie overall. Angelina has marketed herself completly different, she marketed herself as edgier, mysterious, headstrong. I think the average person would think Aniston is more relatable and feel compelled to be sympathetic to her. I totally agree about the settling in past marriages and how Jolie and Pitt seem to have much more in common. You can just tell how much they care for those kids. I think it''s absolutly genuine. She even looks great pregnant psssshhh. You know I read this article yesterday on Jen Aniston and it was saying that even though the divorce papers went through and all "sources close to Jen" said she was very upset all over again when Pitt adopted Angies kids and Angie announced her pregnancy. As if she felt a sense of finality when she heard the news and it made her look at Vince differently....ie how would he be as a father? husband? I read that and I was like ewwww....it would suck if she just had a kid with Vince to try and fill an emotional void she felt over Pitt''s recent news

 

[moon river]

Date: 1/18/2006 11:50:17 AM
Author: devientdrow
Platrock, GREAT points!! It''s all about marketability, how someone markets themselves sooooooo changes how people see them. Jen has marketed herself as a the sweet girl next door when really you read certain things about her that will make you say wow....she is a little partier sometimes huh? The best movie I loved her in was a dark comedy/drama The Good Girl with Jake Gyllenhall. LOVED it. In the movie she was a wife having an affair with a younger man at her wal mart style job. In the movie she was sarcastic and depressed and she rocked at. It was the best role i''ve seen her in, I think I thought so highly of it because it wasn''t the romantic comedy where she is bubbly and funny....she was average and drab and bleak and it was refreshing. It''s a good movie overall. Angelina has marketed herself completly different, she marketed herself as edgier, mysterious, headstrong. I think the average person would think Aniston is more relatable and feel compelled to be sympathetic to her. I totally agree about the settling in past marriages and how Jolie and Pitt seem to have much more in common. You can just tell how much they care for those kids. I think it''s absolutly genuine. She even looks great pregnant psssshhh. You know I read this article yesterday on Jen Aniston and it was saying that even though the divorce papers went through and all ''sources close to Jen'' said she was very upset all over again when Pitt adopted Angies kids and Angie announced her pregnancy. As if she felt a sense of finality when she heard the news and it made her look at Vince differently....ie how would he be as a father? husband? I read that and I was like ewwww....it would suck if she just had a kid with Vince to try and fill an emotional void she felt over Pitt''s recent news

I also liked her in The Good Girl. I''ve never seen any on Angelina''s movies, execpt ''Girl Interuppted'' just not into the types of movies she does, mostly action and heavy stuff. I''ve not seen Mr&Mrs Smith either. Jennifer does the type of ''fluff'' movies I like to watch. Can''t take alot of drama, too much going on in my real life. I think she has started choosing quantity over quality because her last few pics have been flops. I hope she doesn''t have a ''revenge kid'' w/Vince or anyone else, because the kid will be the one to suffer. I think Britney Spears had a kid to try and be on an even keel w/K-Feds ex. Looks like she succeeded. He may be leaving her soon too!

 

[devientdrow]

Lets hope! Thats so very sad one of the other articles was how Brit and Kfed (haha I can''t even type that name seriously) are always up and down and arguing and drama and how it''s bad for the baby. How young children may not know what words are being said but they are affected by arguing and tension

Now she wants to have another one!! crazy crazy lady!

 

[Mara]

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/pitt-and-jolie.30633/
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/brangelina-engaged.34955/

Since the convo moved more towards liking one vs the other, there are two previous threads where much of the same was said...

I have pretty much said what I thought previously, and I am skeptical of these two making it just because in the past such intense inthepress relationships between celebrities always burn out. I do feel badly for the children, and now there is another one being brought into the world.

Does anyone know why Angelina didn't have kids with either of her ex-husbands? Instead she wanted to adopt. Wonder why she wants to have a biological kid with Brad or maybe it was unplanned. Just fairly interesting. TheSuperficial had a hilarious line a week or so back about her body being smart enough to reject other men and embrace Brad when he came along.

I also have hope for these two because of how adamant in the past Jolie was about her kids not getting attached to some random man who would not be around. She has certainly opened her home and heart to Brad so I hope that means that they really feel this is the real thing or a real thing that will last a while...and I hope that she is smart enough and experienced enough to not be taken for a ride if Brad IS just out for something other than love and family. Very hard to say.

 

[DonaBella]

Date: 1/18/2006 12:21:16 PM
Author: moon river

Date: 1/18/2006 11:50:17 AM
Author: devientdrow
Platrock, GREAT points!! It''s all about marketability, how someone markets themselves sooooooo changes how people see them. Jen has marketed herself as a the sweet girl next door when really you read certain things about her that will make you say wow....she is a little partier sometimes huh? The best movie I loved her in was a dark comedy/drama The Good Girl with Jake Gyllenhall. LOVED it. In the movie she was a wife having an affair with a younger man at her wal mart style job. In the movie she was sarcastic and depressed and she rocked at. It was the best role i''ve seen her in, I think I thought so highly of it because it wasn''t the romantic comedy where she is bubbly and funny....she was average and drab and bleak and it was refreshing. It''s a good movie overall. Angelina has marketed herself completly different, she marketed herself as edgier, mysterious, headstrong. I think the average person would think Aniston is more relatable and feel compelled to be sympathetic to her. I totally agree about the settling in past marriages and how Jolie and Pitt seem to have much more in common. You can just tell how much they care for those kids. I think it''s absolutly genuine. She even looks great pregnant psssshhh. You know I read this article yesterday on Jen Aniston and it was saying that even though the divorce papers went through and all ''sources close to Jen'' said she was very upset all over again when Pitt adopted Angies kids and Angie announced her pregnancy. As if she felt a sense of finality when she heard the news and it made her look at Vince differently....ie how would he be as a father? husband? I read that and I was like ewwww....it would suck if she just had a kid with Vince to try and fill an emotional void she felt over Pitt''s recent news

I also liked her in The Good Girl. I''ve never seen any on Angelina''s movies, execpt ''Girl Interuppted'' just not into the types of movies she does, mostly action and heavy stuff. I''ve not seen Mr&Mrs Smith either. Jennifer does the type of ''fluff'' movies I like to watch. Can''t take alot of drama, too much going on in my real life. I think she has started choosing quantity over quality because her last few pics have been flops. I hope she doesn''t have a ''revenge kid'' w/Vince or anyone else, because the kid will be the one to suffer. I think Britney Spears had a kid to try and be on an even keel w/K-Feds ex. Looks like she succeeded. He may be leaving her soon too!

I agree with all that both of you mentioned here...I just haven''t been drawn to too much else that Jen has done...She IS ''Rachel'' making movies...I haven''t seen the upcoming "Derailed" yet and that looks good actually, but, seriously, just cuz she''s in it doesn''t make me go see a movie. For that matter, just cuz Brad Pitt is in a movie or Angelina Jolie is in a movie doesn''t cause me to lose all sense and go to the freakin movie.

Regarding whether or not Jen will suddenly become a mom with Vince or anyone else? Nah...She has worked too hard marketing herself and signing up for movies to shove that all aside for a biological pause...not yet anyway, I don''t feel. She has her head on pretty straight when it comes to her career, it appears. Like any other woman, she needs to take her time and be ready. Angelina is at that point and so is Brad.

And Brit and K-Fed? OMG...please...that one is just a matter of time, sorry to say...

...and with a little baby already...terribly sad...I pray she holds off and gets the marriage going in the right direction--if they can--before even thinking of another little one. Marriage is tough enough under NORMAL circumstances for the average person, let alone a celebrity hookin'' up with an admitted individual w/commit issues(i.e. previous GF and 2 kids)...

 

[devientdrow]

Hmm lets see addressing Mara''s post...Angelina was married to her Hackers co star Johnny Lee Miller. They didn''t have any kids, but I think they were together longer then she and Billy Bob. I think it was possibly because they were both young and just starting out in thier respective careers. Apparently the two are still very close friends or something.

From what i''ve read Angelina adopted Maddox right before ending it with Billy Bob. I read she got very attached to Cambodia and Cambodian issues while filming Tomb Raider there. Thats what sparked all her humanitarian stuff. I woudln''t be surprised if she saw the need there and just thought I can do this, I have the means to give one of these children a great life. One of her big quotes is something about how she once said she would feel guilty having a biological child, that she would think of all the children all over that need adopting. I know it''s been reported that Brad is super loving towards his adoptive children but I think I read that was something that he really wanted with Jolie, a biological child. It also strikes me as probably a bit of unplanned pregnancy. Recently somewhere in some interview they asked her if she and Brad were going to adopt more children and she said definatly, she wants something crazy like a child from every country! As much as I love Angelina i''d probably politely reminder her that thier children not collectors items. hahaha, seems it comes from a good place though, she wants to give what she can I read somewhere that she''s always really saying how blessed she is for getting the money she does. She said she saves 1/3 of what she makes, lives off of 1/3 and gives 1/3 away. Wish I had enough dough to do that!

 

[Mara]

Angelina collapses (supposedly):

http://www.thesuperficial.com/archives/2006/01/18/angelina_jolie_collapses.html

 

[CaptAubrey]

If I had to put up with everything she does, I''d collapse too.

But what do I know?

 

[lmurden]

It''s official!

Jolie''s Adopted Kids Can Take Pitt''s Name

Thu Jan 19, 1:09 PM ET

A judge granted a request Thursday by actress Angelina Jolie to change the names of her two adopted children to reflect that actor Brad Pitt intends to become their adoptive father.

Neither Jolie nor Pitt attended the hearing.

Superior Court Judge Linda Lefkowitz approved the motion during a closed hearing about a month after lawyers for Jolie filed the paperwork.

"The court granted the name change, " attorney Evan Spiegel, who represents the actress, told reporters outside court. He did not take questions.

Pitt''s publicist, Cindy Guagenti, said on Jan. 11 that Jolie is pregnant with Pitt''s child.

ADVERTISEMENT


The names of the adopted children will become Zahara Marley Jolie-Pitt and Maddox Chivan Jolie-Pitt. Zahara celebrated her first birthday on Jan. 8. Maddox, a boy, is 4.

The 41-year-old actor accompanied Jolie, his "Mr. & Mrs. Smith" co-star, when she went to Ethiopia in July to adopt Zahara.

In 2002, Jolie, adopted Maddox in Cambodia where she filmed "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider."

Pitt divorced Jennifer Aniston last October after 4 1/2 years of marriage, citing irreconcilable differences. He has denied Jolie was behind the split, and for months the couple did not publicly acknowledge their relationship despite increasingly frequent sightings together.

Jolie, who won an Oscar for her supporting role in 1999''s "Girl, Interrupted," is divorced from actors Billy Bob Thornton and Jonny Lee Miller.

 

[roxy7]

Does anyone else think that, had Jen been pregnant or had Brad''s child, he would have still left her for Angelina???

I am really curious to know. See, I am kind of thinking that Brad was unhappy in the marriage for a long time. I mean, he told Diane Sawyer and the whole world for years that all he wanted was a family. I kind of think that he is a decent guy, but he left because he was really unhappy for a long time and he fell in love with someone else who would give him what he wanted most -- a family.

If Jen had a kid with him, or had been pregnant, I don''t think he would have left.