- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 5,083
k
Yes, I read the Atlantic piece last week, the one they reference in your link, with the epidemiologist estimating between 40-70 of people will contract the virus. I thought it sounded likely even then, and more so now. Considering the estimates that 1/3 of the world population got the 1918 flu, and that this coronavirus has a higher rate of transmission, those numbers seem reasonable. So reading this or that epidemiologist say "you're going to know people who die of this", isn't alarmist, although admittedly alarmING. I think that anyone downplaying the seriousness of this situation now just because she is in an age group with a lower mortality rate, or who is downplaying to self-soothe, is whistling past the graveyard.
The thing to remember, for me at least, is you can do as much as you can reasonably do, and then the rest really is a crap shoot. Uncertainly rules. You'd think after the last 3 years we'd be getting used to it. It's hard though, isn't it?
Count me in now as concerned. By the numbers, the genie is out of the bottle. This will not be contained. The infection rate is significantly higher than the flu. The percent needing hospital intervention is also significantly higher. We (us healthcare system) simply does not have enough beds to take care of all the people needing help. The percent who need hospital intervention who don't get it are much more likely to die. Fir example my sister does not have insurance. She is the kind of person who doesn't seek medical help, because she wants to avoid the big bills. And she works with the public. We are going to see alot of people die in the next year. Https://medium.com/@amwren/forget-a...be-worried-about-the-coronavirus-890fbf9c4de6
Yes, I read the Atlantic piece last week, the one they reference in your link, with the epidemiologist estimating between 40-70 of people will contract the virus. I thought it sounded likely even then, and more so now. Considering the estimates that 1/3 of the world population got the 1918 flu, and that this coronavirus has a higher rate of transmission, those numbers seem reasonable. So reading this or that epidemiologist say "you're going to know people who die of this", isn't alarmist, although admittedly alarmING. I think that anyone downplaying the seriousness of this situation now just because she is in an age group with a lower mortality rate, or who is downplaying to self-soothe, is whistling past the graveyard.
The thing to remember, for me at least, is you can do as much as you can reasonably do, and then the rest really is a crap shoot. Uncertainly rules. You'd think after the last 3 years we'd be getting used to it. It's hard though, isn't it?