icekid
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
- Messages
- 7,476
Yes, More pictures please please...Date: 4/11/2009 10:45:57 AM
Author: Dani
I came back to drool over your ring again, gummi!! We need more photos, especially from a little further away, so I can see the finger coverage- LOL!!!!
My thoughts exactly!Date: 4/11/2009 3:42:43 AM
Author: Po10472
WOWWEEEE
Stunning with a capital S!!
seriously gorgeous and my ideal setting from Leon, what a joy, you must be soooo thrilled!!
Hi Dani-- I''m working on more pics. My camera is horrible, so I had to borrow one to get these shots. I''m going to try to get FI to take some more *maybe* tomorrow if it''s sunny and if I can sneak back to my office and borrow the camera again!!Date: 4/11/2009 10:45:57 AM
Author: Dani
I came back to drool over your ring again, gummi!! We need more photos, especially from a little further away, so I can see the finger coverage- LOL!!!!
Ok, I''m going by memory here, but I think the depth is 65% and the table is 69%. I''m not sure about the crown height though. I will check the GIA report. The table is a little large by most standards, but the diamond isn''t glassy or dull at all. It goes to show you never know with fancies! It also got labeled as "Excellent" cut by ERD. I know it''s not a GIA grade, but it made me feel good.Date: 4/11/2009 11:46:53 AM
Author: elzny
Yes, More pictures please please...Date: 4/11/2009 10:45:57 AM
Author: Dani
I came back to drool over your ring again, gummi!! We need more photos, especially from a little further away, so I can see the finger coverage- LOL!!!!Also, curious on the other proportions? table & depth % & crown ht, just for reference for my friend who''s searching... Thanks!!