mamie
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 163
I''m barely over a week engaged and I already want to forget the wedding and elope. We''re meeting with my first pick venue tomorrow (a pretty place that is affordable compared to the other few nice venues in the area), so thankfully that''s not stressing me that much. BUT......
It''s the photography that''s making me ca-RAZY.
I''m very picky about photos. I really love photography, and it''s really important to me that I look back on our photos and think, "I''m so glad we invested in this." FI, on the other hand, doesn''t see why photographers are thousands of dollars and if he had his way would probably scrap my photography budget altogether! We are paying for the wedding orselves on a pretty modest budget (8-10K in a lower cost of living area).
Here are the options:
Photographer A: http://www.kmphotographyweddings.com/ - Love love the style, colors, contrast and artistry. Problem here is the lowest package includes 6 hours of coverage plus an enagement session, but the CD rights are an additional $1000, making the minimum $2500 plus some travel expenses for e-pics. At the top (will end up OVER) of my photo budget.
Photographer B: http://www.michaelminnig.com/ -- More affordable by far, all day coverage with album, two photographers, e-session and CD rights for under 2K. However it''s not as artistic and crisp and modern as Photographer A.
Photographer C: http://www.kathymartinweddings.com/ - Very artistic. Hits around 2K for 6 hours with CD rights. E-session would be extra. Very artistic...too artistic? Lacking contrast compared to A.
Photographer D: http://www.studio-d-photo.com/ -- Just discovered through a MySpace search. Sent request for pricing.
if you could give me your thoughts, I''ll bake you call cupcakes or something else really sugary. : )
It''s too early in the process to be freaking out this much. I just feel that budget go higher and higher and higher.....
Thanks!!
It''s the photography that''s making me ca-RAZY.
I''m very picky about photos. I really love photography, and it''s really important to me that I look back on our photos and think, "I''m so glad we invested in this." FI, on the other hand, doesn''t see why photographers are thousands of dollars and if he had his way would probably scrap my photography budget altogether! We are paying for the wedding orselves on a pretty modest budget (8-10K in a lower cost of living area).
Here are the options:
Photographer A: http://www.kmphotographyweddings.com/ - Love love the style, colors, contrast and artistry. Problem here is the lowest package includes 6 hours of coverage plus an enagement session, but the CD rights are an additional $1000, making the minimum $2500 plus some travel expenses for e-pics. At the top (will end up OVER) of my photo budget.
Photographer B: http://www.michaelminnig.com/ -- More affordable by far, all day coverage with album, two photographers, e-session and CD rights for under 2K. However it''s not as artistic and crisp and modern as Photographer A.
Photographer C: http://www.kathymartinweddings.com/ - Very artistic. Hits around 2K for 6 hours with CD rights. E-session would be extra. Very artistic...too artistic? Lacking contrast compared to A.
Photographer D: http://www.studio-d-photo.com/ -- Just discovered through a MySpace search. Sent request for pricing.
if you could give me your thoughts, I''ll bake you call cupcakes or something else really sugary. : )
It''s too early in the process to be freaking out this much. I just feel that budget go higher and higher and higher.....
Thanks!!