smallricey
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2021
- Messages
- 35
I see, thanks I will try that and report back.None of the videos were taken in lighting that would show contrast. Try outside in the shade. A overcast day is best.
the rarecarats diamond video does show a pretty defined facets no? if this is what crushed ice is I’m fine with it..but I’m still within the return periodYes, unfortunately, a lot of "crushed ice" cushions are what we call "mushy". They are light gray in the middle and dont have
good light return. You arent going to see any contrast (black) in a "mushy" stone.
Are you still within the return period? We can help you pick out a stone that should have better light return.
Cushions that have a more defined facet pattern will have better light return and will usually show contrast.
For example...
You have something like this....
If you want nice light return, fire, brilliance with contrast you need something like this0.61-Carat Cushion Cut Diamond | Blue Nile
www.bluenile.com
0.72-Carat Cushion Cut Diamond | Blue Nile
www.bluenile.com
0.70-Carat Cushion Cut Diamond | Blue Nile
www.bluenile.com
Most crushed ice stones wont have a ton of contrast, but some do.
got it, so inIn a crushed ice diamond, it is the leakage, instead of the obstruction, that acts as contrast.
You do not want any significant amount of obstruction in a crushed ice diamond. Do you want a dark and leaky stone?
You want a good distribution of light return (red/yellow in ASET) and leakage (white in ASET),and maybe some obstruction (blue in ASET), but not that much.
Stones with the crushed ice look aren’t recommended here. We can’t really address whether you have a *good* crushed ice stone, as well-cut diamonds don’t have the appearance of crushed ice. If the crushed ice look is what you want, and you’ve said it is, then you will need to judge with your own eyes whether you consider the stone a good one for you.
the rarecarats diamond video does show a pretty defined facets no? if this is what crushed ice is I’m fine with it..but I’m still within the return period
A Complete Guide to Radiant Cut Diamonds | Whiteflash
Discover how to buy a high performing and beautiful radiant cut diamond along with guidance on settings, where to buy and more.www.whiteflash.com
Look at what WF considers a good crushed ice radiant: even distribution of light return (red/white) and leakage (black in this case) with minimal obstruction (blue)
So . . . did you like it when you got it and got talked out of it? You asked about quality and got educated answers but if you really like it, then keep it.
A lot of people on this forum have less than perfect diamonds that they just love.
Yes, unfortunately, a lot of "crushed ice" cushions are what we call "mushy". They are light gray in the middle and dont have
good light return. You arent going to see any contrast (black) in a "mushy" stone.
Are you still within the return period? We can help you pick out a stone that should have better light return.
Cushions that have a more defined facet pattern will have better light return and will usually show contrast.
For example...
You have something like this....
If you want nice light return, fire, brilliance with contrast you need something like this0.61-Carat Cushion Cut Diamond | Blue Nile
www.bluenile.com
0.72-Carat Cushion Cut Diamond | Blue Nile
www.bluenile.com
0.70-Carat Cushion Cut Diamond | Blue Nile
www.bluenile.com
**edited by moderator to comply with trade policies**
Spread = table or does it mean something else?
It's the dimensions of your diamond, when you look at it faceup. At 4.89 x 4.74 mm your stone looks very small for its 0.64ct carat weight.
Oic…yah I put it in stonealgo. It looks like 0.58 carat.
the way I see it is that the other 4.9mm diamonds ain’t cheaper so I’m ok with that. Unless small spread has other issue than face up size
The issue is that you likely paid for a size you didnt get. Stones are often priced based on carat weight. So you might have overpaid for a stone that looks small
Nah I paid $1350. So like I said if the only problem is the face up coverage then it’s not really a problem in this case. But I could see that being a problem if other similar 4.9mm size stones are cheaper. As I mentioned, they re more expensive so I’m ok with it.
Great that you got what you wanted!