shape
carat
color
clarity

Diagem et al

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
A few things... first of all I am not going to sign over the soul of my diamond to someone else''s discretion. That should just be a given. Ultimately the choices would have to be mine and mine alone without risk of being ostracized.

I also cannot guarantee that there even IS a better cut that stays in the old mine arena. Obviously somewhere deep inside is an ideal H&A that could be carved out but that is not my goal.

The way I see this proposition is a "put your time where your mouth is, Sara". I have long cried for there to be a known standard for cushion cuts and to me this would be an opportunity to help all of the *real* cut experts out there by crunching a bunch of numbers and angles that they just simply do not have time for and I would be more than happy to do and it benefiting my own stone would be icing on the cake. Hopefully the information I got would be helpful in the big scheme as well.

They pretty much have rounds covered - with some squabbles over bits and pieces here and there.
Princesses have a standard - even if how to deal with the different quantities of chevrons is still an ongoing debate.
The square H&A has come a long way even in the last 3 years - essentially a cushion but truly demanding a squared shape.

ALSO:

A round has 8 mains that can all be the same length as - well it is a circle.
A square H&A gets around this by having the mains avoid the corners so that they are still all equidistant from the center.
The jubilee had the whole 12/3/6/9 thing going but they got around it by clipping the corners into a bit of an octagonal shape.
Ovals have gotten around "bow tie" by putting the junction at 3/9 o''clock instead of having the mains there as was the old tradition and many cushion types have used this as well.

When you get into the omc style cushions (whether they be true omc or not) you have corner mains that have different needs than side mains. And if you get into a long cushion you actually have 3 lengths of main to deal with. The four corners being one length, the ends being a second length, and the short sides being a third. And somehow you have to get ALL of those lengths to work in harmony. not an easy task! I totally get why this cut is so far down on the list of importance.

I also know that when you have a well cut cushion it does magical things and people want to replicate that magic and no one wants to spend the countless hours on the research when there are more profitable and tangible results to be had with easier cuts - not to mention actually providing the $rough$ and like someone here said, cut the soul right out of it looking for perfection.

I started this thread not to be talked into a recut or to be talked out of one - but to chew on it with people I trust who know about this stuff. I am open to a recut but I am not married to it.

The cutter I approached is Brian. Now my thinking was that I essentially have about 20 months before I want it done as that is when my anniversary is and I could let him hold the stone and mull over the stone in the back of his head for a good long period of time because I know there is no easy answer on what is best to do. I trust Brian - I trust his skill and I trust his integrity but I don''t know that he has an easy or ready answer for this somewhat complicated situation. My pavilion is shallow and the crown is heavy, it is elongated and wonky. The ends have a totally different personality than the middle and I want to keep the architectural charm of an older style cut stone. I cannot expect him to spend hours and hours and hours on my one stone figuring out what would work best so it is very tempting to help do the legwork and see if anything at all would be an obvious improvement or the whole thing is an academic waste of time.

So that''s where I am - I have not made a decision either way and would like to think about it. The other wrench in the mix is that I just moved back from Europe and am moving to china in 4 mos and I don''t have a lot of time between now and then but after I move I imagine I will have quite a bit of time on my hands and that''s a dilemma for me as this proposition is very flattering. I also don''t know if I have what it takes to be anything more than an embarrassment to myself and I''d hate to let anyone else down along the way. And most of all I don''t want to change my stone at any cost.

Okay that was longer than I thought it would be but I got most of my thoughts out...
 
Sara and DG - I am sure those issues can all be worked out.
I am back on deck if you wish to talk Sara
 
Date: 9/14/2009 5:51:02 PM
Author: DiaGem
Date: 9/14/2009 9:38:00 AM

Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)


Date: 9/12/2009 1:48:20 PM

Author: Cehrabehra

I just want to say WHEEEEEEEE I totally remember why I had so much fun on rocky talk back in the day lol


Okay - so I am not suggesting that my stone be recut in the way I have marked in red on my sarin (probably too shallow to accommodate that) but why couldn''t a stone be cut like that in general at 1.26? You say it like it is a simple concept but I really don''t know. I always hoped that someone would give me diamcalc as a gift but alas, I am not so special lol


Well that is not true - you are very special and your knowledge and interest in diamonds is way above average even for people who worked in the industry for decades.

Sergey asked me to post this message and Admin agrees that it would be fun and educational for all.


“Hi Cehrabehra,

We do not like do gifts but if you are “special enough”, you can receive DC


1) We send you DC( Hasp key for standard version)

2) You try do recut in DC (cut Designer). You need use your current 3D model and optimize pattern or Light Return at least. It is hard task , but you have real chances do it.

3) If you publish reasonable results ( new 3d model with low yield lost (up to you
1.gif
), good LR,.. and YOU AGREE for such RECUT! Reasonable good result means you agree for such recut ) in 3 months on PS, you won DC. Otherwise you need return hasp key

DO you agree for such game? “



Let us know Sara, and we will have someone send you a DiamCalc hasp key.

Interesting..., just lets make it clearer...


Garry..., who will judge ''reasonable results'' (LR and low yield loss) in OMC?

If Cehra agrees for such a recut..., who will execute? Is she free to pick the cutting house?

re:who will judge ''reasonable results'' (LR and low yield loss) in OMC?

Only owner of diamond can do final decision . In our case Sara is designer and owner in same time. But she should be agree recut according here plan

re:If Cehra agrees for such a recut..., who will execute? Is she free to pick the cutting house?

She is free in here choice . I just ask 3D model before and after recut, also I advice scan diamond during recut several( very often) times to control recut. Recut for Cushion is much more difficult task than recut for RBC
If she does not find anybody for recut, we will help find good company for such recut
 
Thank you Sergey and thank you Garry - I''m up for the adventure :)
 
Date: 9/11/2009 3:33:28 PM
Author: Cehrabehra
Hi Todd! Thank you for your (kind) reply :)

My feelings overall on the stone ARE mixed so you didn''t miss anything. I love the stone itself (intrinsically) and I like what it does in some situations but I''m pretty confident it could have been done better. I get what you''re saying about the if it ain''t broke.. but it ain''t right either. I am just out of touch with what is a setting issue and what is a diamond issue - it''s been driven home to me that a ''well cut'' stone will look good in any setting and mine doesn''t - does that mean it isn''t well cut? When it was unset or in the holder thingy that let in a lot of light through the pavilion the thing was just a firebomb in every direction and THAT beauty I haven''t see in any other stone (probably intentional) and I no longer see in mine.

I do appreciate your comments - I need to talk this through, I don''t have a conclusion yet.

No doubt! And that is one of the cool things about the forum is that it is a great place to "talk things out" and get insight from a bunch of different people!

Date: 9/11/2009 5:17:59 PM
Author: Harriet
Hey, Cehra! Maybe Strm = DiaGem?

!!! WOW !!!
23.gif
23.gif
23.gif

I''m so glad that I didn''t have anything in my mouth just now... I definitely would have to buy a new keyboard! That''s a riot! Too bad I know it''s not even close to being true, I''d love to see that rumor grow into something interesting
2.gif
 
Date: 9/15/2009 12:26:46 PM
Author: Todd Gray
Date: 9/11/2009 3:33:28 PM

Author: Cehrabehra

Hi Todd! Thank you for your (kind) reply :)


My feelings overall on the stone ARE mixed so you didn''t miss anything. I love the stone itself (intrinsically) and I like what it does in some situations but I''m pretty confident it could have been done better. I get what you''re saying about the if it ain''t broke.. but it ain''t right either. I am just out of touch with what is a setting issue and what is a diamond issue - it''s been driven home to me that a ''well cut'' stone will look good in any setting and mine doesn''t - does that mean it isn''t well cut? When it was unset or in the holder thingy that let in a lot of light through the pavilion the thing was just a firebomb in every direction and THAT beauty I haven''t see in any other stone (probably intentional) and I no longer see in mine.


I do appreciate your comments - I need to talk this through, I don''t have a conclusion yet.


No doubt! And that is one of the cool things about the forum is that it is a great place to ''talk things out'' and get insight from a bunch of different people!


Date: 9/11/2009 5:17:59 PM

Author: Harriet

Hey, Cehra! Maybe Strm = DiaGem?


!!! WOW !!!

23.gif
23.gif
23.gif


I''m so glad that I didn''t have anything in my mouth just now... I definitely would have to buy a new keyboard! That''s a riot! Too bad I know it''s not even close to being true, I''d love to see that rumor grow into something interesting
2.gif

bahaha - it''s never too late to start a good rumor
31.gif
 
Wow - well that gog cushion I saw yesterday changes everything. I had no idea what he''s been up to. I feel like such a fool. I know I was gone for a long while but I had no clue that he''d done this research. I don''t know what that means for me exactly, but I know that for cushion lovers everywhere the revolt is not only begun but it is in production! I need to rethink everything I thought when I started this thread. When I saw that diamond yesterday it flipped me out totally. My first feeling was of wanting to cry - in awe that what I saw in my head for years was before my eyes and in sorry confirmation that oh hell no did my stone not do it like that. I can''t believe that the stone is still in consideration - it needs to be on a finger now! I have never been jealous of a stone before. I had no idea that Jonathan was doing all of this... and it seems like whatever legwork I aspired to undertake has already been done and done better than I ever could. I haven''t ever aspired to be a diamond designer or number cruncher for any reason other than wanting to have on my finger what I saw in my head and if someone else has already done all of the work to support that then there is no reason for me to do it.

Congratulations, Jonathan - you did good :)
 
Date: 9/16/2009 4:31:29 PM
Author: Cehrabehra
Wow - well that gog cushion I saw yesterday changes everything. I had no idea what he''s been up to. I feel like such a fool. I know I was gone for a long while but I had no clue that he''d done this research. I don''t know what that means for me exactly, but I know that for cushion lovers everywhere the revolt is not only begun but it is in production! I need to rethink everything I thought when I started this thread. When I saw that diamond yesterday it flipped me out totally. My first feeling was of wanting to cry - in awe that what I saw in my head for years was before my eyes and in sorry confirmation that oh hell no did my stone not do it like that. I can''t believe that the stone is still in consideration - it needs to be on a finger now! I have never been jealous of a stone before. I had no idea that Jonathan was doing all of this... and it seems like whatever legwork I aspired to undertake has already been done and done better than I ever could. I haven''t ever aspired to be a diamond designer or number cruncher for any reason other than wanting to have on my finger what I saw in my head and if someone else has already done all of the work to support that then there is no reason for me to do it.

Congratulations, Jonathan - you did good :)
Yeah the GOG OMCs are beautiful I wanted one really bad for my fiance, bought one but she just liked the modern cushion look better.
But they don''t have even sized 8 pavillion mains. The 1 5 7 11 mains are smaller as I''m sure you know.

I am very curious of how much weight loss it would take to recut your diamond to tight gog standards. (Its probably too much!)
 
Date: 9/16/2009 5:46:28 PM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover
Date: 9/16/2009 4:31:29 PM

Author: Cehrabehra

Wow - well that gog cushion I saw yesterday changes everything. I had no idea what he''s been up to. I feel like such a fool. I know I was gone for a long while but I had no clue that he''d done this research. I don''t know what that means for me exactly, but I know that for cushion lovers everywhere the revolt is not only begun but it is in production! I need to rethink everything I thought when I started this thread. When I saw that diamond yesterday it flipped me out totally. My first feeling was of wanting to cry - in awe that what I saw in my head for years was before my eyes and in sorry confirmation that oh hell no did my stone not do it like that. I can''t believe that the stone is still in consideration - it needs to be on a finger now! I have never been jealous of a stone before. I had no idea that Jonathan was doing all of this... and it seems like whatever legwork I aspired to undertake has already been done and done better than I ever could. I haven''t ever aspired to be a diamond designer or number cruncher for any reason other than wanting to have on my finger what I saw in my head and if someone else has already done all of the work to support that then there is no reason for me to do it.


Congratulations, Jonathan - you did good :)
Yeah the GOG OMCs are beautiful I wanted one really bad for my fiance, bought one but she just liked the modern cushion look better.

But they don''t have even sized 8 pavillion mains. The 1 5 7 11 mains are smaller as I''m sure you know.


I am very curious of how much weight loss it would take to recut your diamond to tight gog standards. (Its probably too much!)

Yes I see the corner mains are thinner but you can''t argue the performance. As much as I have always envisioned a daisy look in the stone, I wouldn''t have one at the cost of performance. I just wondered if I could have one with performance. Maybe I can convince Jon to make that his next project lol I have no idea how much would need to be cut on my stone though.
 
Thank you kindly Cehra. No need to reinvent the wheel unless you wanted 8 petals instead of 4 (which in fact is underway too
41.gif
). I wasn''t aware that you weren''t aware of our creation but more than anything am glad to see you love what you see. I will do everything within my means to help you get into one (one way or another) when you are ready as you are one of the original people who inspired me towards this vision and for that I am grateful. You are a class act but I knew that already.
41.gif


Kindest regards,
 
Date: 9/16/2009 11:04:38 PM
Author: Rhino
Thank you kindly Cehra. No need to reinvent the wheel unless you wanted 8 petals instead of 4 (which in fact is underway too
41.gif
). I wasn''t aware that you weren''t aware of our creation but more than anything am glad to see you love what you see. I will do everything within my means to help you get into one (one way or another) when you are ready as you are one of the original people who inspired me towards this vision and for that I am grateful. You are a class act but I knew that already.
41.gif


Kindest regards,
What? Don''t tease me Jon
35.gif
. The trivial pursuit cushion is being developed?

trivialpursuitOMC1.jpg
 
so you ARE working on the 8 even main type that is at 12/3/6/9 like that maxmilion? Well then... my anniversary is in 20 months LOL No pressure ;)
 
Yes but not with that big nasty dark center.
14.gif
I like bright pedals.
17.gif


CCL ... we're getting this in the incoming OEC's.
 
Yes Jon, I love what I see and I applaud you. It really was about time that someone picked that up! Enjoy your success - except you really should charge more. Except to me of course lol
 
Date: 9/17/2009 12:54:19 AM
Author: Rhino
Yes but not with that big nasty dark center.
14.gif
I like bright pedals.
17.gif


CCL ... we''re getting this in the incoming OEC''s.
Well you mean a new type of OEC or the existing OEC prototypes (4th gen) in the vidoes?

i) Shape is round not cushion.
ii) Contrast arrows like in a round, not like in the maximillion :)

I am already interested in the OECs ones with even thicker arrows would be even more interesting. But .......... thats not a cushion??!?!?!?!?!
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top