shape
carat
color
clarity

Does anyone think this is a nice mens ruby/diamond ring?

I think it depends on the man. Some guys would be able to carry it off; others would look like a mobster. I didn't see any mention of its dimensions, so it's hard to tell. If it's a big honker, it would turn me off. If it's small enough to be a pinky ring, maybe, depending on the guy. The important thing is, do YOU like it? That's what counts.
 
I know you recently posted about another ring

As Laurie said, it's whether you like it that matters- but both rings have fairly decent price tags and I think for that sort of money I'd step away from eBay. I think you could buy nicer mens rings for that money. I like the ring you posted but echo everything said above. My FIL has a similar ring that he wear as a rhr and although I'm used to it now.. It doesn't seem quite right somehow. Definitely a bit blingy gangster ish!
 
JewelFreak|1407011897|3725056 said:
I think it depends on the man. Some guys would be able to carry it off; others would look like a mobster. I didn't see any mention of its dimensions, so it's hard to tell. If it's a big honker, it would turn me off. If it's small enough to be a pinky ring, maybe, depending on the guy. The important thing is, do YOU like it? That's what counts.

It is a size 10, which would make it around 2cm on each side.
 
I would shop around and see if you likt that style and if the price is competitive. I personally am not into that style for men. There is a store in Colorado that I like: www.jalbrechtdesigns.com
 
I do not like it at all
and I do not think the numbers add up. 41 grams of 18 kt gold (after subtracting the stone weight) is ever so slightly less than a troy ounce of gold. that alone as scrap is $1300. That leaves 700 for the 1 carat of diamonds and the rubies. The close up photo of the inside of the band shows the metal was over worked and is greatly fatigued; there is a great deal of cracking. That or the metal is not what is claimed (or both). I could stamp lead with a 18kt stamp, but even Isaac Newton couldn't turn it into gold.
 
JewelFreak|1407011897|3725056 said:
I think it depends on the man. Some guys would be able to carry it off; others would look like a mobster.

^^ditto. But none of the "men in my life" wear rings other than wedding bands, so I am not used to seeing them on guys.
 
VapidLapid|1407020785|3725108 said:
I do not like it at all
and I do not think the numbers add up. 41 grams of 18 kt gold (after subtracting the stone weight) is ever so slightly less than a troy ounce of gold. that alone as scrap is $1300. That leaves 700 for the 1 carat of diamonds and the rubies. The close up photo of the inside of the band shows the metal was over worked and is greatly fatigued; there is a great deal of cracking. That or the metal is not what is claimed (or both). I could stamp lead with a 18kt stamp, but even Isaac Newton couldn't turn it into gold.

But don't forget that it is 18k gold, which works out as 30 grams of 24k. Scrap is not valued at the market spot price - 15-20% below is a good rate. So that would be around $950. Your logic is absolutely correct, of course, and I just wanted to add the alloy and scrap perspective to it.

I am curious about the stress cracking. It is not the type of ring that should be resized (despite the seller's comment) and it would take a good amount of work hardening to get it to crack like that. My guess is that it is cast and an alloy with too much zinc or silicon (to improve pouring) was used.
 
Interesting about the zinc and silicon. It certainly doesnt look like a hand made piece.
I think our maths are the same. 41 grams of 18kt = 30.6 grams of 24kt also known as slightly under a troy ounce. gold is at 1300. Also true that most places do not buy scrap at spot price. A few do come much closer though, especially if they are the refiner, not a middleman.
 
Since you asked, I don't like it.
 
If you know a refiner that pays better than 85-87.5% for gold, please let me know. 12.5% is the best I've seen.

I do like the wood grain texture, though.
 
The seller's feedback would have had me pressing the back button quicker than quick.
 
txgreeneyes|1407050007|3725256 said:
The seller's feedback would have had me pressing the back button quicker than quick.

eep. Definitely!
 
Judging by the feedback it would appear you might not get what you paid for.
 
Thanks, VL & Lady D. I would have thought the crud on the inside of the shank was from wear. Your experience & knowledge is invaluable -- I love to learn new stuff! Don't ever leave us, ok? :wavey:

--- Laurie
 
Elliot86|1407065080|3725293 said:
Judging by the feedback it would appear you might not get what you paid for.

Amen. I am sorry but this seller is very suspect to me and has been for years.
 
I'm probably chiming in too late but I agree with everyone else.
1. Cracks in the metal is not a good sign. The ring will not hold up well and is likely to break during your ownership.
2. I disagree with the vendor that this type of ring is sizable. Add to the fact that the metal is showing stress signs makes resizing riskier.
3. As always, check feedbacks on the vendor.

Nice/not nice is subjective, per the wearer's taste or personal preference.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP

Featured Topics

Top